Advertisement

Status of Defensive Enzymes and Contents of Total Phenols, Tannins and Nutrients Determine Aphid Resistance in Barley

  • Nivesh Batra
  • Kamaljit Kaur
  • Harinderjeet Kaur
  • Beant Singh
Research Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to identify the biochemical traits responsible for aphid resistance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). The genotypes showing differential response towards aphid attack, i.e. EC-492253, EC-492255, EC-492350, BCU-423 and PL-426 were taken for the present study. The grain yield was found to be maximum in EC-492253 and BCU-423, moderate in EC-492255 and EC-492350 while minimum in PL-426 genotype under natural aphid attack. The activities of defensive enzymes viz. polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), β-1, 3-glucanase and chitinase were determined in the flag leaves and grains of all the genotypes during different stages of development. The various biochemical constituents, i.e. total phenols, total soluble proteins, free amino acids, sugars and tannins were also estimated. The higher activities of PAL, PPO, β-1, 3-glucanase and chitinase along with the higher contents of total phenols and tannins in the flag leaves and grains of tolerant genotypes might attribute towards pest resistance. On the other hand, the higher contents of total soluble proteins, free amino acids and sugars in the flag leaves of susceptible genotype could be responsible for making it a better host for the aphids. The results of the multivariate principal component analysis showed that the susceptible, moderately tolerant and highly tolerant genotypes occupied distinct positions on the graph on the basis of enzymatic activities and biochemical constituents. It was further observed that there was a fine relation between the biochemical traits identified for stress tolerance and the grain yield of these genotypes.

Keywords

Barley Aphids Defensive enzymes Biochemical constituents 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India for providing financial support for this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest among the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    FAS (2016) World agricultural production, circular series WAP 8-16. Unites States, Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mornhinweg DW (2010) Biotic stress in barley: insect problems and solutions. In: Ullrich SE (ed) Barley: production, improvement and uses. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 355–390Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yin J, Chen JL, Cao YZ, Li KB, Hu Y, Sun JR (2005) Wheat resistance induced by exogenous chemicals to the wheat aphid, Sitobian avenae (F.) and the Oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Walker). Acta Entomol Sin 48:718–724Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang TW, Liu CZ (2011) Influences of Rhopalosiphum padi on oxidases of three wheat seedlings. Plant Prot 37:72–75Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li SJ, Wu YQ, Liu AZ, Li SG, Hang SP (2001) Studies on biochemical mechanism of resistance to phopalosiphum padi on wheat in milking stage. Acta Phytophylacica Sin 4:331–334Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbehenn RV, Constabel PC (2011) Tannins in plant herbivore interactions. Phytochem 72:1551–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camacho-Cristobal JJ, Anzellotti D, Gonzalez-Fontes A (2002) Changes in phenolic metabolism of tobacco plants during short term boron deficiency. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:997–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang LY, Hua ZX, Lin TH, Wei ZJ, Ming YJ (2003) Increase of β-1,3 glucanase and chitinase activities in cotton callus cells treated by salicylic acid and toxin of Verticillium dahliae. Acta Bot Sin 45:802–808Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NT, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Djocgoue PF, Mbouobda HD, Boudjeko T, Effa PO, Omokolo DN (2011) Amino acids, carbohydrates and heritability of resistance in the Theobroma cacao/Phytophthora megakarya interaction. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:370–383Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dubois M, Gilles KN, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Calorimetric method for the determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaur R, Kaur K (2016) Appraisal of maize germplasm for identification of nutritionally rich nutraceutical genotypes. Cereal Res Commun 44:501–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYS-pc.version 2.0. Exeter software. Setauket, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaman ME, Copaja SV, Argandona VH (2003) Relationships between salicylic acid content, phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity, and resistance of barley to aphid infestation. J Agric Food Biochem 51:2227–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raj SN, Sarosh BR, Shetty HS (2006) Induction and accumulation of polyphenol oxidase activities as implicated in development of resistance against pearl millet downy mildew disease. Funct Plant Biol 33:563–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duffey SS, Felton GW (1991) Enzymatic antinutritive defences of the tomato plant against insects. In: Hedin PA (ed) Naturally occuring pest bioregulators, vol 449. ACS Publications, Washington, DC, pp 166–197Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shetty SM, Chandrashekar A, Venkatesh YP (2011) Egg plant polyphenol oxidase multigene family: cloning, phylogeny, expression analyses and immune localization in response to wounding. Phytochem 72:2275–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Qiao LX, Ding X, Wang HC, Sui JM, Wang JS (2014) Characterization of the β-1,3-glucanase gene in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by cloning and genetic transformation. Genet Mole Res 13:1893–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee TM, Lur HS, Lin VH, Chu C (2006) Physiological and biochemical changes related to methyl jasmonate induced chilling tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Plant Cell Env 19:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borad V, Sriram S (2008) Pthogenesis related proteins for the plant ptotection. Asian J Exp Sci 22:189–196Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sakihama Y, Yamasaki H (2002) Lipid peroxidation induces by phenolics in conjunction with aluminium ions. Biol Plant 45:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kosova K, Vitamvas P, Prasil IT (2014) Proteomics of stress responses in wheat and barley-search for potential protein markers of stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00711 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li H, William AP, Gerald JM, Charles MR (2008) Reducing plant abiotic and biotic stress: drought and attacks of greenbugs, corn leaf aphids and virus disease in dryland sorghum. Environ Exp Bot 63:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sunkad G, Kulkarni S (2006) Studies on structural and biochemical mechanisms of resistance in groundnut to Puccinia arachidis. Indian Phytopath 59:323–328Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gunduz EA, Douglas AE (2009) Symbiotic bacteria enable insect to utilize a nutritionally inadequate diet. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:987–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berger S, Sinha SK, Roitsch T (2007) Plant physiology meets phytopathology: plant primary metabolism and plant-pathogen interaction. J Exp Bot 58:4019–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baena-Gonzalez E (2010) Energy signaling in the regulation of gene expression during stress. Mol Plant 3:300–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bolton MD (2009) Primary metabolism and plant defense—fule for the fire. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morkunas I, Ratajczak L (2014) The role of sugar signaling in plant defense responses against fungal pathogens. Acta Physiol Plant 36:1607–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dhingra M, Arora N, Aujla IS (2013) Biochemical characteristics imparting resistance against Alternaria blight in cauliflower genotypes. Agric Sci Dig 33:92–97Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hansen AK, Moran NA (2011) Aphid genome expression reveals host-symbiont cooperation in the production of amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:2849–2854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sempruch C, Ciepiela AP (2002) Changes in content and amino acids composition of protein of winter triticale selected cultivars caused by grain aphid feeding. J Plant Prot Res 42:37–44Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dixon AFG (1998) Aphid ecology: an optimization approach, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Giordanengo P, Brunissen L, Rusterucci C, Vincent C, Bel VA (2010) Compatible plant aphid interactions: how aphids manipulate plant responses. C R Biol 333:516–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moctezuma C, Hammerbacher A, Heil M, Gershenzon J, Mendez-Alonzo R, Oyama K (2014) Specific polyphenols and tannins are associated with defense against insect herbivores in the tropical oak Quercus oleoides. J Chem Ecol 40:458–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nivesh Batra
    • 1
  • Kamaljit Kaur
    • 1
  • Harinderjeet Kaur
    • 2
  • Beant Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia

Personalised recommendations