Lack of an Association Between Sperm Head Abnormality and DNA Damage by Alkaline Comet Assay
- 63 Downloads
Sperm DNA damage affects sperm function, compromising reproductive outcome in both natural and assisted reproduction. The present study addresses the existing ambiguity between sperm morphology and DNA damage, by use of comet assay/single cell gel electrophoresis. Using comet assay as an end point, sperm DNA fragmentation in a total of 17 control and infertile subjects presenting to the infertility clinic of Kasturba Medical College has been investigated. Percent tail DNA, tail length and olive tail moment were selected as a measure to compare the extent of DNA damage between the groups. No significant difference was observed between the control group with morphologically normal sperm and experimental group with abnormal sperm morphology with respect to head DNA, tail DNA, Olive tail moment or tail length by alkaline comet assay. The comet assay failed to demonstrate any positive association between sperm morphology and DNA damage. In view of accumulating evidence on the importance of sperm DNA integrity in fertilization and embryogenesis, refined techniques allowing sperm selection with intact sperm DNA or with minimal DNA damage for clinical use should be sought.
KeywordsSperm DNA damage Male infertility Teratozoospermia Sperm morphology Intracytoplasmic sperm injection Assisted reproductive technology Assisted reproduction Semen Comet assay Sperm DNA fragmentation
Funding from Indian Council of Medical Research in the form of ad hoc scheme (5/10/7/2003-RHN) to SKA and Senior Research Fellowship to VJ (Nos. 3/1/2/5/2010-RHN, IRIS ID 2009-06740) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Jayalaxmi Pai, Sandhya Patil and Keerthi G Patil, from the Manipal Assisted Reproduction Centre for the technical support.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest among them to publish this manuscript.
- 13.World Health Organization (1999) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm–cervical mucus interaction, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cary WH (1930) Sterility diagnosis: the study of sperm cell migration in female secretion and interpretation of findings. N Y State J Med 30:131–136Google Scholar
- 16.Joel CA (1971) Historical survey of research on spermatozoa from antiquity to the present. In: Joel CA (ed) Fertility disturbances in men and women. Karger, Basel, pp 3–47Google Scholar
- 18.Freund M (1968) Performance and interpretation of the semen analysis. In: Rolands M (ed) Management of the infertile couple. Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, p 48Google Scholar
- 19.Van Zyl JA, Kotze TJvW, Menkveld R (1990) Predictive value of spermatozoa morphology in natural fertilization. In: Acosta AA, Swanson RJ, Ackerman SB, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA, Menkveld R (eds) Human spermatozoa in assisted reproduction. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 319–324Google Scholar
- 23.O’Neil J, Lundquist L, Ritter J, Chantilis SJ, Carr BR, Byrd W (1998) Should strict morphology be used to indicate the need for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)? Fertil Steril 70:S442Google Scholar
- 32.Osawa Y, Sueoka K, Iwata S, Shinohara M, Kobayashi N, Kuji N, Yoshimura Y (1999) Assessment of the dominant abnormal form is useful for predicting the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the case of severe teratozoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet 16:436–442CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.Auger J, Eustache F, Andersen AG, Irvine DS, Jørgensen N, Skakkebaek NE, Suominen J, Toppari J, Vierula M, Jouannet P (2001) Sperm morphological defects related to environment, lifestyle and medical history of 1001 male partners of pregnant women from four European cities. Hum Rep 16:2710–2717CrossRefGoogle Scholar