Advertisement

Can Artificial Reefs Really Enhance the Inshore Fishery Resources Along Indian Coast? A Critical Review

  • G. B. SreekanthEmail author
  • N. Manju Lekshmi
  • Narendra Pratap Singh
Review
  • 197 Downloads

Abstract

The depletion of fishery resources and their habitats on account of fishing, pollution and other anthropogenic activities necessitates their replenishment by some strategic management approaches. Artificial reef (AR) is a kind of artificial fish habitat which provides living, hiding and breeding places for aquatic organisms and thereby augmenting the biodiversity and abundance of fishery resources. In particular, the installation of ARs along coastal regions could bring down the fishing pressure from mechanized sectors and thus support the small scale traditional fisheries. Since the management based on AR is not species specific but effective for all aquatic organisms in the ecosystem, it allows fishery managers to move from a single species framework to ecosystem based fisheries management in the long run. Being a tropical coastal nation, India has also initiated trials on AR deployment. However, these studies so far are limited to the design, construction and performance of AR. In this review paper, the historical AR initiatives in India are critically analyzed and potential areas for research and development that the country can focus on are discussed particularly in the perspective of supplementing the inshore fisheries.

Keywords

Artificial reef AR Enhancement Inshore fishery Fish abundance Management Restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the guidance, support and encouragement from Director, ICAR-CCARI, Dr. Narendra Pratap Singh for this study. The author is grateful to Dr. Deepak George Pazhayamadom (UCC, Ireland), Ajey Patil (Dive Goa), Dr. Divu D. and Dr. Sreenath K. R. (CMFRI, Kochi) and Dr. S.K. Chakraborty (CIFE, Mumbai) for their guidance and support in composing the manuscript. The support and contributions from Director of Fisheries, Dr. Shamila Monteiro and former superintendent of fisheries, Dr. Hrishikesh Pawar are greatly appreciated. The author also expresses heartfelt thanks to the technical, administrative and supporting staff of ICAR-CCARI for their moral support. There is no conflict of interest in this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Grossman GD, Jones GP, Seaman JW (1997) Do artificial reefs increase regional fish production? A review of existing data. Fisheries 22:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bortone SA, Turpin RK, Cody RC, Bundrick CM, Hill RL (1997) Factors associated with artificial-reef fish assemblages. Gulf Mex Sci 15:17–34Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pitcher TJ, Seaman JW (2000) Petrarch’s principle: how protected human-made reefs can help the reconstruction of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Fish Fish 1(1):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petit GD (1972) Stake beds as crappie concentrators. In: Proceedings of annual conference SE association game fish commissioners 1972, 401–406Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paxton KO, Stevenson F (1979) Influence of artificial structures on angler harvest from Killdeer Reservoir, Ohio. In: Johnson DJ, Stein RA (eds) Response of fish to habitat structure in standing water. North Central Division, American Fisheries Society, pp 70–76Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eugene (2014) Artificial reefs woohoo. MarineLifeisAwesome Blogger. http://marinelifeisawesome.blogspot.in/2014/08/artificial-reefs-are-good-true-or-false.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2017
  7. 7.
    Reefworlds (2013) Reef worlds inspired tourism development. Reef Worlds Blogger. http://artificialreefdesign.blogspot.in/2013/06/fish-assemblages-on-estuarine.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2017
  8. 8.
    Carlisle JG, Turner CH, Ebert EE (1964) Artificial habitat in the marine environment. Calif Dept Fish Game Fish Bull 124:15–93Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mottet MG (1981) Enhancement of the marine environment for fisheries and aquaculture in Japan. Technical Report No. 69, Washington Department of Fisheries, Washington, pp 40–90Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buckley RM (1982) Marine habitat enhancement and urban recreational fishing in Washington. Mar Fish Rev 44(6–7):28–37Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vik SF (1982) Japanese artificial reefs technology. Aquabio, Inc, 2957 Sunset Blvd, Bellair Bluffs, FL, Technical Report 604, p 380Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grove RS, Sonu CJ (1983) Review of Japanese fishing reef technology. Southern California Edison Company, Rosemead, CA 91770, Technical Report. 83-RD-137, p 112Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okamoto M (1983) Diurnal-nocturnal activity of fishes near the artificial seaweeds farm plant (experimental floating reef). Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 49:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell BC, Talbot FH, Domm S (1974) Patterns of colonization of artificial reefs by coral reef fishes. In: Cameron AM et al (ed) Proceedings of the second international symposium on coral reefs, pp 207–215Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Molles MC (1978) Fish species diversity on model and natural reef patches: experimental insular biogeography. Ecol Monogr 48:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Talbot FH, Russell BC, Anderson GRV (1978) Coral reef fish communities: unstable, high-diversity systems? Ecol Monogr 48:425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogden JC, Ebersole JP (1981) Scale and community structure of coral reef fishes: a long term study of a large artificial reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gascon D, Miller RA (1981) Colonization of nearshore fish on small artificial reefs in Barkley Sound, British Columbia. Can J Zool 59:1635–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edmund L (1960) Marine habitat improvement in Japan. Foreign Service Dispatch 180, American Embassy, Tokyo, Department of State, Washington DC, p 4Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clady MD, Summerfelt RC, Tafanelli R (1979) Floating tire breakwaters and ecology of coves in an Oklahoma reservoir. Proc Ann Conf SE Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 33:495–506Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raymond WF (1975) Sand and coral monitoring at two artificial reefs in Florida. Sand Beach 43(2):3–10Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang YH (1978) Artificial reef and beach erosion control. In: Aska DY (ed) Artificial reefs in F1orida, F1orida Sea Grant College Report, 24, pp 38–40Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Consoli P, Martino A, Romeo T, Sinopoli M, Perzia P, Canese S, Vivona P, Andaloro F (2014) Effect of shipwreck on associated fish assemblages in the Central Mediterranean Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 2014:1–8Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mathews H (1981) Artificial reef site: selection and evaluation. In: Aska DY (ed) Artificial reefs: conference proceedings, Aorida Sea Grant Report, 41, pp 50–54Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakamura M (1982) The planning and design of artificial reefs and tsukiio. In: Vik SF (ed) Japanese artificial reef technology, Aquabio, Inc, 2957 Sunset Blvd, Bellair Bluffs, FL Technical Report 604, pp 49–66Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Myatt DO (1978) The “trolling alley” fishing system. In: Aska DY (ed) Artificial reefs in Florida, Florida Sea Grant Report, 24, pp 35–36Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matsumoto WM, Kazama TK, Aasted DC (1981) Anchored fish aggregating devices in Hawaiian waters. Mar Fish Rev 43(9):1–13Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fager EW (1971) Pattern in the development of a marine community. Limnol Oceanogr 16:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Russell BC (1975) The development and dynamics of a small artificial reef community. Helgo Wiss Meeresunters 27:298–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bohnsack JA, Talbot FH (1980) Species-packing by reef fishes on Australian and Caribbean reefs: an experimental approach. Bull Mar Sci 30:710–723Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gallaway BJ (1981) An ecosystem analysis of oil and gas development on the Texas-Louisiana Continental Shelf. USFWS, Biological Services, Washington DC. FINS/OBS-81127, p 89Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kamikita M (1982) A sample calculation for the design of a cube-type artificial reef (regular and large). In: Vik SF (ed) Japanese artificial reef technology. Aquabio, Inc, 2957 Sunset Blvd, Bellair Bluffs, FL Technical Report 604, pp 66–76Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Adams C, Lindberg B, Stevely J (2011) The economic benefits associated with Florida’s artificial reefs. ADIS Document No. FE 649, Food and Resource Economics Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pickering H, Whitmarsh D (1997) Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fish Res 31(1–2):39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stone RB (1985) National artificial reef plan. NOAA Tech Mem NMFS OF-6, Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington DC, p 70Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bohnsack J (1989) Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioural preference? Bull Mar Sci 44(2):631–645Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    McIntosh GS (1981) A concept for artificial reefs as fishery management tools in the United States. In: Proceedings of the fourth international coral reef symposium, Manila, Philippines I, pp 99–103Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miyazaki C, Sawada T (1978) Studies on value judgement of fishing grounds with natural fish reefs and artificial fish reefs. I. Relations between natural fish reefs and artificial ones. J Fac Mar Sci Technol Tokai Univ 2:71–78Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Philipose KK (1996) Artificial reefs habitat enhancement and increasing fisheries potential. CMFRI Bull 48:4–7Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mohamad Kasim H, Syda Rao G, Rajagopalan M, Vivekanandan E, Mohanraj D, Kandasami P, Muthiah P, Jagdis I, Gopakumar G, Mohan S (2013) Economic performance of artificial reefs deployed along Tamil Nadu coast, South India. Indian J Fish 60(1):1–8Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Edward L, Ghosh S (2014) Artificial reefs and its importance in marine fisheries management. Fish Chimes 34(5–6):26–27Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bombace G (1997) Protection of biological habitats by artificial reefs, European artificial reef research. In: Proceedings of the first EARRN conference, Ancona, Italy, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fabi G, Fiorentini L (1994) Comparison of an artificial reef and a control site in the Adriatic Sea. Bull Mar Sci 55:538–558Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Guiral D, Gourbault N, Helleouet MN (1995) Sediment nature and meiobenthos of an artificial reef (Acadja) used for extensive aquaculture. Oceanol Acta 18:543–555Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Randall JE (1963) An analysis of the fish populations of artificial and natural reefs in the Virgin Islands. Caribb J Sci 3:31–47Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ogawa Y (1968) Experiments on the attractiveness of artificial reefs for marine fishes. VIII: attraction of young yellow-tail to the model fish reefs. Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 34:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ogawa Y (1966) Experiments on the attractiveness of artificial reefs for marine fishes. IV: attraction of stone bream and rudderfish to black objects on the white background. Bull Tokai Reg Fish Res Lab 46:137–145Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lukens RR (1981) Ichthyofauna colonization of a new artificial reef in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Res Rep 7(1):41–49Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Connell SD, Glasby TM (1999) Do urban structures influence local abundance and diversity of subtidal epibiota? A case study from Sydney Harbour, Australia. Mar Environ Res 47:373–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lim TM, McKaye KR, Weiland DJ (1976) An investigation into the use of artificial habitats as a means of increasing the fishery productivity of the Great Lakes complex of Nicaragua. In: Thorson TB (ed) Investigations of the ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan lakes, School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, pp 311–319Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kock RL (1982) Patterns of abundance variation in reef fishes near an artificial reef at Guam. Environ BioI Fish 7:121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Takemura Y, Ogawa Y (1966) Experiments on the attractiveness of artificial reefs for marine fishes. II: an automatic recording device. Bull Tokai Reg Fish Res Lab 45:115–126Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sayer MDJ, Wilding TA (2002) Planning, licensing and stakeholder consultation in an artificial reef development: the Loch Linnhe reef, a case study. ICES J Mar Sci 59:S178–S185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yoshimuda N, Masuzawa H (1982) Suitable conditions for reef installation. In: Vik SF (ed) Japanese artificial reef technology, Aquabio, Inc, 2957 Sunset Blvd, Bellair Bluffs, FL Technical Report 604, pp 137–146Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stone RB, Pratt HL, Parker RO, Davis GE (1979) A comparison of fish populations on an artificial and natural reef in the Florida Keys. Mar Fish Rev 41(9):1–11Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stone RB (1982) Artificial reefs: toward a new era in fisheries enhancement? Mar Fish Rev 44(6–7):2–3Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lin JC, Su WC (1994) Early phase of fish habitation around a new artificial reef off south-western Taiwan. Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):1112–1121Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fast DE (1974) Comparative studies of fish species and their populations on artificial and natural reefs off southeastern Puerto Rico. MSc Thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, p 90Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jensen AC (1975) Artificial fishing reefs. Marine ecosystem analysis (Mesa) Program, Mesa New York Bight Atlas Monogr 18, p 23Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Haroun RJ, Gomez M, Hernandez JJ, Herrera R, Montero D, Moreno T, Portillo A, Torres ME, Soler E (1994) Environmental description of an artificial reef site in Gran-Canaria (Canary-Islands, Spain) prior to reef placement. Bull Mar Sci 55:932–938Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Liao DS, Cupka DM (1979) Economic impacts and fishing success of offshore sport fishing over artificial reefs and natural habitats in South Carolina. South Carolina Marine Resources Centre Technical Report 38, p 27Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Osenberg CW, St CM, Mary JA, Wilson WJ Lindberg (2002) A quantitative framework to evaluate the attraction-production controversy. ICES J Mar Sci 59:S214–S221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Milon JW, Holland SM, Whitmarsh DJ (2000) Social and economic evaluation methods. Artificial reef evaluation with application to natural marine habitats, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 165–194Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Survery of India (2017) Official website of Survey of India. http://www.surveyofindia.gov.in/. Accessed on 25 Jan 2017
  65. 65.
    Hammond DL, Myatt DO, Cupka DM (1977) Evaluation of midwater structures as a potential tool in the management of the fisheries resources on South Carolina’s artificial reefs. South Carolina Mar Res Centre Technical Report 15, p 19Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Grove RS (1982) Artificial reefs as a resource management option for siting coastal power stations in Southern California. Mar Fish Rev 44(6–7):24–27Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Duffy JM (1974) California’s artificial reef experiences. In: Colunga L, Stone R (ed) Proceedings of artificial reef conference, Texas A&M University, TAMU-SG-74-103, pp 47–48Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Dewees CM, Gotshall DW (1974) An experimental artificial reef in Humboldt Bay, California. Calif Fish Game 60:109–127Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    London Convention and Protocol/UNEP (2009) Guidelines for the placement of artificial reefs. London Convention and Protocol/UNEP, 2009. London, UK, p 100Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pickering H (1996) Artificial reefs of bulk waste materials: a scientific and legal review of the suitability of using the cement stabilised by-products of coal-fired power stations. Mar Policy 20(6):483–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Weisburd S (1986) Artificial reefs. Sci News 130(4):59–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sinanuwong K (1991) Artificial reefs in Thailand. RAPA Report (FAO)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Aprieto VL (1991) Payao: Tuna aggregating device in the Philippines. Fisheries Statistics of the Philippines 1, p 1975Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Stone BR, Grove SR, Sonu JC (1983) Artificial fish habitat technology in the United States-Today and Tomorrow. In: Proceedings of Japan-US symposium on artificial habitat for fisheries, Tokyo, Japan, pp 21–27Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bohnsack JA, Harper DE, McClellan DB, Hulsbeck M (1994) Effects of reef size on colonization and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs off eastern Florida, USA. Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):796–823Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hornell J (1924) The fishing methods of the Madras Presidency. Madras Fish Bull 18:60–66Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bergstrom M (1983) Review of experiences with past and present knowledge about fish aggregating devices. In: BOBP Working Paper No. 23, p 35Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    D’Cruz T (1995) Artificial fish habitats-Impact on artisanal fisheries. Report of the South Indian Federation of Fishermen Societies, Trivandrum, p 57Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Philipose KK, Vivekanandan E, Devadoss P (1995) Artificial fish habitats. In: CMFRI Technology Series No. 8, p 16Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    CMFRI (2009) CMFRI annual report 2008–2009. CMFRI, Kochi, p 122Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vivekanandan E, Venkatesan S, Mohanraj G (2006) Service provided by artificial reef off Chennai: a case study. Indian J Fish 53(1):67–75Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Patnaik S (2015) Artificial reefs begin to yield result. The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Visakhapatnam/artificial-reefs-begin-to-yieldresult/article7471884.ece. Accessed 25 Jan 2017
  83. 83.
    Turner CH, Ebert EE, Given RR (1969) Man-made reef ecology. California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 146, p 221Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kuroki T (1982) Sound production and the auditory sense of fish. In: Vik SF (ed) Japanese artificial reef technology, Aquabio, Inc, 2957 Sunset Blvd, Bellair Bluffs, FL Technical Report, 604, pp 282–283Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Higo N, Nagashima M (1978) On the fish gathering effect of the artificial reefs ascertained by diving observation. II. At the sea of the Satsuma Peninsula in Kagoshima Prefecture. Mem Fac Fish Kagoshima Univ 27:117–130Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Anon (2009) Artificial reefs for the enhancement of biological resources and livelihoods of fishermen: CMFRI’s final report. Fish Chimes 29(5):31–34Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Sreekanth GB, Lekshmi NM, Singh NP, Patil A (2015) Fish assemblages of Grande Island, situated along southwest coast of India. In: Proceedings of international conference on biodiversity and evaluation-perspectives and paradigm shifts, Kerala, India, ISBN: 978-93-80095-70-7, pp 122–126Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Yogesh Kumar JS, Geetha S (2012) Fouling communities on shipwreck site in the Gulf of Mannar, India. Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol 3(2):259–264Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Schirach PV (2014) “Reef Balls” Help Rehabilitate Marine Habitat. Schirach Report Web. http://schirachreport.com/2014/12/26/reef-balls-help-rehabilitate-marine-habitat/. Accessed 25 Jan 2017
  90. 90.
    Reef Ball Foundation (2006) A step-by-step guide for grassroots efforts to Reef Rehabilitation. Reef Balll Foundation Web. http://www.reefball.org/tm/tm/stepbystepguidetoreefrestoration.htm. Accessed 25 Jan 2017
  91. 91.
    Harris LE (2003) Artificial reef structures for shoreline stabilization and habitat enhancement. In: Proceedings of 3rd international surfing reef symposium, Ragland, New Zealand, pp 176–178Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Strelcheck AJ, Cowan JH, Shah A (2005) Influence of reef location on artificial-reef fish assemblages in the North Central Gulf of Mexico. Bull Mar Sci 77(3):425–440Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Shankar D (2000) Seasonal cycle of sea level and currents along the coast of India. Curr Sci 78:279–288Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kirkbride-Smith AE, Wheeler PM, Johnson ML (2016) Artificial reefs and marine protected areas: a study in willingness to pay to access Folkestone Marine Reserve, Barbados, West Indies. PeerJ 4: e2175. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2175

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. B. Sreekanth
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Manju Lekshmi
    • 1
  • Narendra Pratap Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research InstituteOld GoaIndia

Personalised recommendations