Role of Phytochemicals and Nucleic Acids in Solving Taxonomic Problems



Phytochemicals and nucleic acids provide valuable tools for delimitation of various taxa and their placement in natural system of classification. Chemical characters are broadly categorized as visible traits, micro- and macromolecules. Compared to visible characters that are few and have limited usage in taxonomy, micro- and macromolecules provide important taxonomic tools. Micromolecular characters are small sized and include phenolic constituents, alkaloids, terpenoids, free amino acids, fats and oils and cyanogenic compounds. Macromolecules, the information containing molecules are large sized and comprise of proteins, DNA and RNA. Though chemical characters provide important taxonomic tools, some of these such as alkaloids and proteins are susceptible to change with regard to changing environmental conditions or ontogeny. Plant parts of same physiological age should, therefore be used for comparative analysis.


Phytochemicals Taxonomy Systematics Nucleic acids 


  1. 1.
    Hutchinson J (1959) The families of flowering plants, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis PH, Heywood VH (1973) Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Robert E Kreiger Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tateoka T (1962) Starch grains of endosperm in grass systematics. Bot Mag, Tokyo 75:377–383Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibbs RD (1945) Comparative chemistry as an aid to the solution of problems in systematic botany. Trans R Soc Canada (3) Sect V 39:71–103Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibbs RD (1958) Biochemistry as an aid to establish the relationship of some families of dicotyledonous plants. J Linn Soc (Bot) 55:669–705Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bremekamp CE (1939) Phylogenetic interpretations and genetic concepts in taxonomy. Chron Bot 5:390Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cronquist A (1977) On the taxonomic significance of secondary metabolites in Angiosperms. Plant Syst Evol Suppl 1:179–189Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bate-Smith EC (1958) Plant phenolics as taxonomic guides. Proc Linn Soc 169:198–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greshenzon J, Mabry TJ (1983) Secondary metabolites and higher classification of angiosperms. Nordic J Bot 3:5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bate-Smith EC (1962) Phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance. J Linn Soc (Bot) 58:95–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alston RE, Turner BE (1963) Biochemical systematics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gornall RJ, Bohm BA (1980) The use of flavonoids in the taxonomy of Boykinia and allies (Saxifragaceae). Can J Bot 58:1768–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soares GLG, Kaplan MAC (2001) Analysis of flavone-flavonol ratio in dicotyledoneae. Bot J Linn Soc 135:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bohm BA, Stussey TF (2001) Flavonoides of the sun flower family Asteraceae, 1st edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nysschen A, van Wyke de M, van Heerden FR (1998) Seed flavonoides of the Podalyrieae and Liparieae (Fabaceae). Plant Syst Evol 212:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hong WP, Greenham S, Jury L, Williams CA (1999) Leaf flavonoid patterns in the genus Tricytris (Tricytridaceae sensu stricto Liliaceae sensu lato). Bot J Linn Soc 130:261–266Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cronquist A (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bate-Smith EC, Metcalfe CR (1957) Leuco-anthocyanins 3. The nature and systematic distribution of tannins in dicotyledonous plants. J Linn Soc (Bot) 55:669–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crawford DJ, Giamsai DE (1984) Plant chemosystematics. Bioscience 32:114–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bate-Smith EC (1959) A chemical approach to plant taxonomy. Low Temperature Research Station Record, Memorandum No 334Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robinson T (1981) The biochemistry of alkaloids, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levin DA (1976) The chemical defenses of plants to pathogens and herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:121–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eich E (2008) Solanaceae and Convolvulaceae: secondary metabolites, biosynthesis, chemotaxonomy, biological and economic significance. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seaman FC (1982) Sesquiterpene lactones as taxonomic characters in the Asteraceae. Bot Rev 48:121–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Young DA, Seigler DS (1981) Phytochemistry and angiosperm phylogeny. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baker RT, Smith HG (1920) A research on eucalypts and their essential oils, 2nd edn. Government Printer, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mirov NT (1956) Composition of turpentines of lodgepole × jack pine hybrids. Canad J Bot 34:443–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mirov NT (1961) Composition of gum turpentines of Pine. US Dept Agric Tech Bull 1239:270–290Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Magotra R, Bhargava R (1982) Amino acid analysis as an aid in taxonomy of genus Crotolaria L. J Ind Bot Soc 64(2):180–188Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hagnaeur R (1977) Cyanogenic compounds as systematic markers in Tracheophyta. Plant Syst Evol (suppl 1):191–209Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martin PG, Boutler D, Penny D (1985) Angiosperm phylogeny using sequences of five macromolecules. Taxon 34:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hawkes JG, Lester RN (1966) Immunological studies on the tuber bearing Solanums-II. Relationships of North American species. Ann Bot 30:269–290Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fairbrothers DE (1983) Evidence from nucleic acid and protein chemistry, in particular serology in angiosperm taxonomy. Nordic J Bot 3:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bilgrami KS (1985) Chemotaxonomy—its status and strategy for future. In: Proceedings of the symposium on phytochemistry and Bot classification. Bilgrami and Dogra CBS, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johanson BL (1972) Seed protein profiles and the origin of hexaploid wheats. Am J Bot 59:952–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boutler D, Derbyshire E, Frahm-leliveld JA, Polhill RM (1970) Observations on the cytology and seed proteins of various African species of Crotolaria L. New Phytol 69:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bhargava R (1983) Metabolites as indicators of polyploidy and hybridity in some bulbous angiosperms. PhD Thesis, University of Jammu, JammuGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Staub JE, Fredrick L, Marty TL (1987) Electrophoretic variation in cross-compatible wild diploid species of Cucumis. Can J Bot 65(4):792–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maass HI (1997) Genetic diversity in top onion, Allium × proliferum analysed by isozymes. Plant Syst Evol 208:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Maab HI, Klaas M (1995) Infraspecific differentiation of garlic Allium sativum L. by isozyme and RAPD markers. Theor App Genet 91:89–97Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pooler MR, Simon PW (1993) Characterization and classification of isozyme and morphological variation in diverse clones of garlic. Euphytica 68:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Etoh E, Ogura H (1981) Peroxidase isozymes in the leaves of various clones of garlic, Allium sativum L. Mem Fac Agr Kagoshima Univ 17:61–101Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vasseur L (2001) Allozymic diversity in Allium tricoccum (Ait.) Solander var. bardicki Hanes in isolated population of Nova Scotia (Canada). Plant Syst Evol 228:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ohnishi O, Matsuoka Y (1996) Search for the wild ancestors of buckwheat II. Taxonomy of Fagopyrum (Polygonaceae) species based on morphology, isozymes and cp DNA variability. Genes Genet Syst 71:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yang X, Wu Z, Chen H, Shao J, Qi Wu (2010) Karyotypic and genetic relationships based on RAPD markers of six wild buckwheat species (Fagopyrum spp.) from southwest China. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Benedich AJ, Mc Carthy BJ (1970) DNA comparisons among barley, oats, rye and wheat. Genetics 65:545–565Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Maggini F (1975) Homologies of ribosomal RNA nucleotide sequences in monocots. J Mol Evol 4:317–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Soller M, Beckmann JS (1983) Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theor Appl Genet 67:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Weising K, Nybom H, Wolff K, Kahl G (2005) DNA fingerprinting in plants-principles, methods, and applications, 2nd edn. CRC-Press, BocaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hanelt P (1988) Taxonomy as a tool for studying plant genetic resources. Kulturpflanze 36:169–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stearn WT (1946) Nomenclature and synonymy of Allium odorum and A. tuberosum. Reprinted (1944) from Herbertia 11:226–245Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Geeta (2005) Cytogenetic studies in Allium tuberosum Rottl. ex Spreng. with emphasis on the phenomenon of apomixis. PhD Thesis, University of Jammu, JammuGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Blattener FR, Friesen N (2006) Relationship between chinese chive (Allium tuberosum) and its putative progenitor as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. In: Zeder MA, Bradley DG, Emshwiller E, Smith BD (eds) New genetic and archeological paradigms. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Bragson BT, Bodvarsdottir SK, Koebner RMD (1999) Molecular variation in legume species and populations. Mol Ecol 8:309–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ali MA, Al-Hemaid FMA, Lee J, Choudhary RK, Al-Harbi NA, Kim S (2011) Genetic assessment of Diplocyclos palmatus (L.) C. Jeffrey from India using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of nucleolar ribosomal DNA. Afr J Biotech 10:16141–16151Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Roy A, Bal SS, Fergary M et al (2012) Wild melon diversity in India (Punjab State). Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bhararthi LK, Parida SK, Munshi AD, Beherab TK, Raman KV, Mohapatra T (2012) Molecular diversity and phenetic relationship of Momordica species of Indian occurrence. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:937–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Do GS, Seo BB (2000) Phylogenetic relationships among Allium subg. Rhizirideum species based on molecular variation of 5SrRNA genes. Korean J Biol Sci 4:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of JammuJammuIndia

Personalised recommendations