Interspecific Competition Between Cotesia vestalis (Halliday) and Diadegma semiclausum (Hellen), Parasitoids of Plutella xylostella (L.)

  • A. Saini
  • P. L. SharmaEmail author
Short Communication


Interspecific competition among parasitoids plays an important role in the population dynamics of parasitoids and their host insects and can affect the outcome of the biological control programme. The aim of the present study was to examine the intrinsic competition between Cotesia vestalis and Diadegma semiclausum, the two most common parasitoids of Plutella xylostella, to determine whether they can be used together compatibly against the pest. Both the parasitoid species were able to multiparasitize the host larvae already parasitized by the other species; however, most of the parasitoids emerged belonged to the species having priority for parasitism. The survival of the host larvae was low (52 ± 3.7%) when the host larvae were first parasitized by D. semiclausum and then followed after 24 h by C. vestalis, as compared to other combinations or individual parasitism, where these values varied from 76 to 80%. When second-instar larvae of the host were offered to females of both the parasitoids simultaneously in the same arena, C. vestalis proved to be a better competitor than D. Semiclausum as the proportion of the progeny developed was 63.2% for C. vestalis and 36.8% for D. semiclausum. Although C. vestalis and D. semiclausum were able to multiparasitize the host larvae, the level of multiparasitism was only 9.5 and 10.1%, indicating that both can be used together for the suppression of P. xylostella in the field.


Cotesia vestalis Diadegma semiclausum Diamondback moth Intrinsic competition Multiparasitism 



The authors are thankful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, for providing financial support to the study through AICRP on Biological Control of Crop Pests and Weeds.


  1. 1.
    Shi Z, Liu SS (2003) Interspecific interactions between Cotesia plutellae and Oomyzus sokolowskii, two major parasitoids of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. YingYong Sheng Tai XueBao 14:949–954Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shi ZH, Li QB, Li X (2004) Interspecific competition between Diadegma semiclausum, Hellen (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in parasitizing Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol 128:437–444Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harvey JA, Poelman EH, Tanaka T (2013) Intrinsic inter- and intraspecific competition in parasitoids wasps. Ann Rev Entomol 58:333–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furlong MJ, Wright DJ, Dosdall LM (2013) Diamondback moth ecology and management: problems progress and prospects. Ann Rev Entomol 58:517–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otieno J, Gbewonyo W, Wilson M (2010) Resistance of diamondback moth to insecticides in selected cabbage farms in southern Ghana. Int J Biol Chem Sci 4:1397–1409Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishadi A, Mazlan N (2015) Insecticide use impacts on pest resistance: an evidence from diamondback moth. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res 22:131–150Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sadia M, Lloyd M, John T (2015) Evolutionary ecology of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) and Diadegma insulare (Cresson) in North America: a review. Ann Res Rev Biol 5:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bai SF, Li X, Chen XX (2011) Interspecific competition between two endo parasitoids, Cotesia vestalis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Oomyzus sokolowskii (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 76:156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sallam MN, Overholt WA, Kairu E (2002) Intraspecific and interspecific competition between Cotesia flavipes and Cotesia sesamiae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), gregarious larval endoparasitoids of lepidopteran stem borers. Biocontrol Sci Technol 12:493–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rossbach A, Lohr B, Vidal S (2008) Interspecific competition between Diadegma semiclausum Hellen and Diadegma mollipla (Holmgren), parasitoids of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L), feeding on a new host plant. Bull Entomol Res 98:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bai SF, Chen XX, Cheng JA, Fu WJ, He JH (2002) Development and ultra structure of Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) teratocytes. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci) 28:636–640Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Talekar NS, Yang JC (1993) Influence of crucifer cropping system on the parasitism of Plutella xylostella (Lep.: Yponomeutidae) by Cotesia plutellae (Hymn.: Braconidae) and Diadegma semiclausum (Hymn.: Ichneumonidae). Entomophaga 38:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang XG, Keller MA (2002) A comparison of the host searching efficiency of two larval parasitoids of Plutella xylostella. Ecol Entomol 27:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu SS, Jiang LH (2003) Differential parasitism of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) larvae by the parasitoids Cotesia plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on two host plant species. Bull Entomol Res 93:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang JC, Chu YI, Telkar NS (1993) Biological studies of Diadegma semiclausum (Hymn: Ichneumonidae), a parasitoids of diamondback moth. Entomophaga 38:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chiang FM, Sun CN (1991) Detoxyfying enzyme and susceptibility to several insecticides of Apanteles plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Diadegma semiclausum (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), parasitoids of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) larvae. Environ Entomol 20:1687–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyDr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and ForestryNauni, SolanIndia

Personalised recommendations