Advertisement

Designing a drug delivery system for improved tumor treatment and targeting by functionalization of a cell-penetrating peptide

  • Shafq Al-azzawiEmail author
  • Dhafir Masheta
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Antitumor drugs activity is often limited due to the lack of satisfactory tumor specificity and bioavailability. Therefore, it is essential to conjugate the antitumor drug to a specific delivery system that can discriminate between tumors and normal tissue, and potentiate the activity. Purpose: the study was aimed to design a delivery system employing a cell-penetrating peptide, TAT, functionalized with a tumor targeting peptide, CREKA, and loaded with antitumor drug via a biodegradable linkage. Methods: the delivery system was synthesized using solid phase peptide synthesis and characterized by mass spectra and HPLC technique. Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry were used to examine the cellular uptake of the drug conjugate by malignant and normal cells whereas cell viability was tested to assess its cytotoxicity. Inhibition assay on dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) to study the drug conjugate efficacy, and its stability examination were also performed. Results: characterization results confirmed successful synthesis of the delivery system and its conjugation with the drug. In addition, cellular translocation studies revealed higher cellular uptake of drug conjugate by malignant cell. The results also showed a better efficacy of the drug in conjugation in cytotoxicity and in the inhibition of DHFR and more stability at neutral pH medium. Conclusion: the functionalization with CREKA targeted the delivery of the antitumor drug to the malignant breast cells, decreasing its distribution to the normal cells. Hence this study demonstrated the potential of the designed delivery system to be used in delivering and translocating of therapeutic agents into a specific tumor tissue.

Keywords

Drug delivery system Targeted drug delivery Cell-penetrating peptide Tumor targeting peptide Cancer chemotherapy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Iraqi ministry of higher education and scientific research and to university of Brighton for supporting this project.

Author contributions

Shafq Al-azzawi and Dhafir Masheta performed whole experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Azzawi S (2017) Improving Flurbiprofen brain-permeability and targeting in Alzheimer’s disease by using a novel dendronised ApoE-derived peptide carrier system. (PhD), University of Brighton. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.754004. Accessed 15 July 2018
  2. Al-Azzawi S, Masheta D, Guildford AL, Phillips G, Santin M (2018) Dendrimeric poly(epsilon-lysine) delivery systems for the enhanced permeability of flurbiprofen across the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103224 Google Scholar
  3. Bechara C, Sagan S (2013) Cell-penetrating peptides: 20 years later, where do we stand? FEBS Lett 587(12):1693–1702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.04.031 Google Scholar
  4. Bolhassani A, Jafarzade B, Mardani G (2017) In vitro and in vivo delivery of therapeutic proteins using cell penetrating peptides. Peptides 87:50–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2016.11.011 Google Scholar
  5. Chung EJ, Cheng Y, Morshed R, Nord K, Han Y et al (2014) Fibrin-binding, peptide amphiphile micelles for targeting glioblastoma. Biomaterials 35(4):1249–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.064 Google Scholar
  6. Cooley C, Wender P, Geihe E (2012) Beyond cell penetrating peptides: designed molecular transporters. Dr Discov Today Technol 9(1):e49–e55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2011.07.004 Google Scholar
  7. D’souza AJ, Topp EM (2004) Release from polymeric prodrugs: linkages and their degradation. J Pharm Sci 93(8):1962–1979.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20096 Google Scholar
  8. Diop N, Zhao R, Visentin M, Goldman ID (2011) Mechanisms of membrane transport of folates into cells and across epithelia. Ann Rev Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-072610-145133 Google Scholar
  9. Dissanayake S, Denny WA, Gamage S, Sarojini V (2017) Recent developments in anticancer drug delivery using cell penetrating and tumor targeting peptides. J Control Rel 250:62–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.02.006 Google Scholar
  10. Dubikovskaya A, Thorne H, Pillow H, Contag H, Wender A (2008) Overcoming multidrug resistance of small-molecule therapeutics through conjugation with releasable octaarginine transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(34):12128–12133.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805374105 Google Scholar
  11. Garg N, Singh B, Jain A, Nirbhavane P, Sharma R et al (2016) Fucose decorated solid-lipid nanocarriers mediate efficient delivery of methotrexate in breast cancer therapeutics. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 146:114–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.051 Google Scholar
  12. Ghaz A, Abbaspour F, Anarjan N, Berenjian A, Jafarizadeh H (2015) Application of chitosan-based nanocarriers in tumor-targeted drug delivery. Mol Biotechnol 57(3):201–218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-014-9816-3 Google Scholar
  13. Guidotti G, Brambilla L, Rossi D (2017) Cell-penetrating peptides: from basic research to clinics. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38(4):406–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2017.01.003 Google Scholar
  14. Guo Y, Zhao Y, Li R, Wang T, Han M et al (2016) Methotrexate nanoparticles prepared with codendrimer from polyamidoamine (PAMAM) and oligoethylene glycols (OEG) dendrons: antitumor efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Scientific Reports 6:28983.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28983 Google Scholar
  15. Guterstam P, Madani F, Hirose H, Takeuchi T, Futaki S et al (2009) Elucidating cell-penetrating peptide mechanisms of action for membrane interaction, cellular uptake, and translocation utilizing the hydrophobic counter-anion pyrenebutyrate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788(12):2509–2517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.09.014 Google Scholar
  16. Hutchinson J, Muller W (2000) Transgenic mouse models of human breast cancer. Oncogene 19(53):6130–6137.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203970 Google Scholar
  17. Joncour V, Laakkonen P (2018) Seek & Destroy, use of targeting peptides for cancer detection and drug delivery. Bioorg Med Chem 26(10):2797–2806.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.08.052 Google Scholar
  18. Kebebe D, Liu Y, Wu Y, Vilakhamxay M, Liu Z et al (2018) Tumor-targeting delivery of herb-based drugs with cell-penetrating/tumor-targeting peptide-modified nanocarriers. Int J Nanomed 13:1425–1442.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s156616 Google Scholar
  19. Kersemans V, Cornelissen B (2010) Targeting the tumour: cell penetrating peptides for molecular imaging and radiotherapy. Pharmaceuticals 3(3):600–620.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ph3030600 Google Scholar
  20. Lee H, Dubikovskaya E, Hwang H, Semyonov A, Wang H et al (2008) Single-molecule motions of oligoarginine transporter conjugates on the plasma membrane of Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Am Chem Soc 130(29):9364–9370.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja710798b Google Scholar
  21. Lindgren M, Rosenthal-Aizman K, Saar K, Eiriksdottir E, Jiang Y et al (2006) Overcoming methotrexate resistance in breast cancer tumour cells by the use of a new cell-penetrating peptide. Biochem Pharmacol 71(4):416–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2005.10.048 Google Scholar
  22. Ma DX, Qi XR (2010) Comparison of mechanisms and cellular uptake of cell-penetrating peptide on different cell lines. Yao Xue Xue Bao 45(9):1165–1169Google Scholar
  23. Madani F, Lindberg S, Langel L et al (2011) Mechanisms of cellular uptake of cell-penetrating peptides. J Biophys.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/414729 Google Scholar
  24. Mäe M, Myrberg H, El-Andaloussi S (2009) Design of a tumor homing cell-penetrating peptide for drug delivery. Int J Pept Res Ther 15(11):11Google Scholar
  25. Meikle S, Perugini V, Guildford AL, Santin M (2011) Synthesis, characterisation and in vitro anti-angiogenic potential of dendron VEGF blockers. Macromol Biosci 11(12):1761–1765.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201100267 Google Scholar
  26. Merrifield RB (1965) Automated synthesis of peptides. Science 150(3693):178–185.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3693.178 Google Scholar
  27. Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65(1–2):55–63Google Scholar
  28. Myrberg H, Zhang L, Mae M, Langel U (2008) Design of a tumor-homing cell-penetrating peptide. Bioconjug Chem 19(1):70–75.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bc0701139 Google Scholar
  29. Najlah M, D’emanuele A (2006) Crossing cellular barriers using dendrimer nanotechnologies. Curr Opin Pharmacol 6(5):522–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2006.05.004 Google Scholar
  30. Park J, Ryu J, Kim K, Lee H, Bahn J et al (2002) Mutational analysis of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein transduction domain which is required for delivery of an exogenous protein into mammalian cells. J G Virol 83(5):1173–1181.  https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-83-5-1173 Google Scholar
  31. Perez E, Fernandez A (2015) Advanced targeted therapies in cancer: drug nanocarriers, the future of chemotherapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 93:52–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.018 Google Scholar
  32. Pilch J, Brown D, Komatsu M, Järvinen T, Yang M et al (2006) Peptides selected for binding to clotted plasma accumulate in tumor stroma and wounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(8):2800–2804.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511219103 Google Scholar
  33. Ramsey D, Flynn H (2015) Cell-penetrating peptides transport therapeutics into cells. Pharmacol Ther 154:78–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.07.003 Google Scholar
  34. Raucher D, Ryu J (2015) Cell-penetrating peptides: strategies for anticancer treatment. Trends Mol Med 21(9):560–570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2015.06.005 Google Scholar
  35. Regberg J, Srimanee A, Langel U (2012) Applications of cell-penetrating peptides for tumor targeting and future cancer therapies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 5(9):991–1007.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ph5090991 Google Scholar
  36. Richard JP, Melikov K, Brooks H, Prevot P, Lebleu B et al (2005) Cellular uptake of unconjugated TAT peptide involves clathrin-dependent endocytosis and heparan sulfate receptors. J Biol Chem 280(15):15300–15306.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M401604200 Google Scholar
  37. Rodríguez H, Suarez M, Albericio F (2010) A convenient microwave-enhanced solid-phase synthesis of short chain N-methyl-rich peptides. J Pep Sci 16(3):136–140.  https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.1209 doiGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruoslahti E (2017) Tumor penetrating peptides for improved drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 110–111:3–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.008 Google Scholar
  39. Shin M, Zhang J, Min K, Lee K, Byun Y et al (2014) Cell-penetrating peptides: achievements and challenges in application for cancer treatment. J Biomed Mater Res A 102(2):575–587.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34859 Google Scholar
  40. Silverman R, Holladay M (2014) The organic chemistry of drug design and drug action, 3rd ed. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Simberg D, Duza T, Park JH, Essler M, Pilch J et al (2007) Biomimetic amplification of nanoparticle homing to tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(3):932–936.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610298104 Google Scholar
  42. Soler M, Gonzalez-Bartulos M, Figueras E, Ribas X, Costas M et al (2015) Enzyme-triggered delivery of chlorambucil from conjugates based on the cell-penetrating peptide BP16. Org Biomol Chem 13(5):1470–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ob01875c Google Scholar
  43. Soriano D, Soler M, González-Bártulos M, Ribas X, Costas M et al (2014) Identification of BP16 as a non-toxic cell-penetrating peptide with highly efficient drug delivery properties. Org Biomol Chem 12(10):1652–1663.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3OB42422G Google Scholar
  44. Stanzl E, Trantow B, Vargas J, Wender P (2013) Fifteen years of cell-penetrating, guanidinium-rich molecular transporters: basic science, research tools, and clinical applications. Acc Chem Res 46(12):2944–2954.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar4000554 Google Scholar
  45. Torchilin V, Levchenko T, Rammohan R, Volodina N, Papahadjopoulos-Sternberg B et al (2003) Cell transfection in vitro and in vivo with nontoxic TAT peptide-liposome-DNA complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(4):1972–1977.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0435906100 Google Scholar
  46. Vargas JR, Stanzl EG, Teng NN, Wender PA (2014) Cell-penetrating, guanidinium-rich molecular transporters for overcoming efflux-mediated multidrug resistance. Mol Pharm 11(8):2553–2565.  https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500161z Google Scholar
  47. Vives E, Brodin P, Lebleu B (1997) A truncated HIV-1 Tat protein basic domain rapidly translocates through the plasma membrane and accumulates in the cell nucleus. J Biol Chem 272(25):16010–16017Google Scholar
  48. Wender P, Mitchell D, Pattabiraman K, Pelkey E, Steinman L et al (2000) The design, synthesis, and evaluation of molecules that enable or enhance cellular uptake: peptoid molecular transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(24):13003–13008.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.24.13003 Google Scholar
  49. WHO (2018) Cancer report. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en. Accessed 2 Oct 2018
  50. Xu L, Zhang H, Wu Y (2014) Dendrimer advances for the central nervous system delivery of therapeutics. ACS Chem Neurosci 5(1):2–13.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cn400182z Google Scholar
  51. Zhao N, Qin Y, Liu H, Cheng Z (2018) Tumor-targeting peptides: ligands for molecular imaging and therapy. Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry-. Anti Cancer Agent 18(1):74–86.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520617666170419143459 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of PharmacyUniversity of BabylonHillaIraq
  2. 2.School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular ScienceUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations