Agricultural Research

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 139–149 | Cite as

Assessment of Water Retention Performance of Pectin-Based Nanocarriers for Controlled Irrigation in Agriculture

  • Raineesh Sharma
  • Jaya Bajpai
  • A. K. Bajpai
  • Somen Acharya
  • Bhuvanesh Kumar
  • R. K. Singh
Full-Length Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

This paper describes synthesis and characterization of calcium-crosslinked nanocarriers of pectin biopolymer and examines their possible applications in controlled irrigation in agriculture. Nanocarriers were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for structural characterization, while the size and surface morphology of the particles was studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy. The water sorption capacities of nanocarriers were investigated under the influence of various experimental factors such as varying amounts of biopolymer and crosslinker, different pH and temperatures of the swelling media. The capacity of the nanocarriers to retain imbibed water was judged by conducting their deswelling experiments. The so-prepared water-loaded nanocarriers were applied to soil, and soil pot experiments were conducted to see their water-releasing potential. Soil pot studies indicated that a judicious combination of soil with pectin-like hydrophilic polymers can be used in arid and semi-arid areas to enhance the drought tolerance of plants by providing sustained irrigation. The effect of different amounts of nanocarriers was studied to evaluate the moisture retention properties of the soil.

Keywords

Biopolymer Pectin Nanocarriers Water sorption Deswelling 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Defense and Research Development Organization (DRDO, New Delhi, India) for providing financial support in the form of a major research project (DIHAR/03/ASSIGN/11), and Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Bhopal, India, and Sophisticated Instrumentation Centre for Applied Research & Testing (SICART), Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India, for providing analytical support to carry out characterizations of prepared nanoparticles.

Supplementary material

40003_2017_257_MOESM1_ESM.doc (49 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 49 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Akhgari A, Abbaspour MR, Rezaee S, Kuchak A (2011) Evaluation of the swelling erosion and drug release from polysaccharide matrix tablets based on pectin and insulin. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 6(1):51–58Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bajpai AK, Mishra A (2005) Preparation and characterization of tetracycline loaded interpenetrating polymers networks of carboxymethyl cellulose and poly(acrylic acid): water sorption and drug release study. Polym Int 54:1347–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Hur M, Faris J, Malik M, Letey J (1989) Polymers as soil conditioners under consecutive irrigations and rainfall. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1173–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buchholz FL, Graham AT (1997) Modern superabsorbent polymer technology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang R (1984) Chemistry. Random House, Inc, New York, United States, p 424Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Couvreur P, Barratt G, Fattal E, Legrand P, Vauthier C (2002) Nanocapsule technology: a review. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 19:99–134Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crescenzi V, Callegaro L (1993) Esters of pectin and pectinic acids, their manufacture and uses. Chem Abstr 120:301518Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dorraji SS, Golchin A, Ahmadi S (2010) The effects of hydrophilic polymer and soil salinity on corn growth in sandy and loamy soils. Clean Soil Air Water 38:584–591Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grant GT, Morris ER, Rees DA, Smith PJC, Thom D (1973) Biological interactions between polysaccharides and divalent cations: the Egg-box model. FEBS Lett 32:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hüttermann A, Orikiriza LJB, Agaba H (2009) Application of superabsorbent polymers for improving the ecological chemistry of degraded or polluted lands. Clean Soil Air Water 37:517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hüttermann A, Zommorodi M, Reise K (1999) Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil Till Res 50:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazim AM, Mokhtar F, Yusof SFM, Ahmad I, Hakam A (2013) Synthesis and characterization of pH sensitive hydrogel using extracted pectin from dragon fruit peel. Malays J Anal Sci 17:481–489Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lentz RD, Sojka RE (1994) Field result using polyacrylamide to manage furrow erosion and infiltration. Soil Sci 158:274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lentz RD, Robbins RE, Sojka CW (1998) Reducing phosphorus losses from surface-irrigated fields: emerging polyacrylamide technology. J Environ Qual 27:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levy GJ, Levin J, Gal M, BenHur M, Shainberg I (1992) Polymers’ effects on infiltration and soil erosion during consecutive simulated sprinkler irrigations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:902–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu L, Fishman ML, Hicks KB (2007) Pectin in controlled drug delivery: a review. Cellulose 14:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    May CD (1997) Pectins. In: Imeson A (ed) Thickening and gelling agents for food. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 124–152Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    May CD (1990) Industrial pectins, sources, production and applications. Carbohydr Polym 12:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mccann MC, Roberts K (1996). Plant cell wall architecutre: the role of pectins. In: Visser G, Voragen AGJ (eds) Pectins and pectinases. Elsevier Sciences, B.V. Amsterdam, pp 91–107Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mishraa RK, Anisb A, Mondalb S, Dutta M, Banthiab AK (2009) Praparation and characterization of amidated pectin based polymer electrolytic membranes. Chin J Polym Sci 27:639–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nazarli H, Zardashti MR, Darvishzadeh R, Mohammadi M (2011) Change in activity of antioxidative enzymes in young leaves of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by application of super absorbent synthetic polymers under drought stress condition. Afr J Crop Sci AJCS 5(11):1334–1338Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nnadi F, Brave C (2011) Environmentally friendly superabsorbent polymers for water conservation in agricultural lands. J Soil Sci Environ Manag 2(7):206–211Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Orona VU, Rascón-Chu A, Lizardi-Mendoza J, Carvajal-Millán E, Gardea AA, Ramírez-Wong B (2010) A novel pectin material: extraction, characterization and gelling properties. Int J Mol Sci 11:3686–3695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park D, Hempleman SC, Propper CR (2001) Endosulfan exposure disrupts pheromonal systems in the red-spotted newt: a mechanism for subtle effects of environmental chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 109:669–673CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patel GM, Trivedi HC (1999) Ceric-induced grafting of methyl acrylate onto sodium salt of partially carboxymethylated sodium alginate. Eur Polymer J 35:201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peppas LB, Harland RS (1990) Absorbent polymer technology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Po RJ, Sci Macromol (1994) Water-absorbent polymers, A patent survey. J Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem Phys 34:607–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Quintana JR, Valderruten NE, Katime I (1999) Synthesis and swelling kinetics of poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate methyl chloride quaternary-co-itaconic acid) hydrogels. Langmuir 15:4726–4728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ranjha NM, Mudassir J, Sheikh ZZ (2011) Synthesis and characterization of pH-sensitive pectin/acrylic acid hydrogels for verapamil release study. Iran Polym J 20(2):147–159Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rolin C, De Vries J (1990) Pectin. In: Harris P (ed) Food gels. Elsevier, London, pp 401–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saiyed H, Dewan A, Bhatnagar V, Shenoy U, Shenoy R, Rajmohan H, Patel K, Kashyap R, Kulkarni P, Rajan B, Lakked B (2003) Effect of endosulfan on male reproductive development. Environ Health Perspect 111:1958–1962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sadeghi M (2011) Pectin-based biodegradable hydrogels with potential biomedical applications as drug delivery systems. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 2:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sharma K, Kaith BS, Kumar V, Kalia S, Kumar V, Swart HC (2014) Water retention and dye adsorption behavior of Gg-cl-poly(acrylic acid-aniline) based conductive hydrogels. Geoderma 232–234:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shainberg I, Levy GJ (1994) Organic polymers and soil sealing in cultivated soils. Soil Sci 158:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Six J, Feller C, Denel K, Ogle SM, Moraes Sa JC, Albrecht A (2002) Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils—effects of no tillage. Agronomies 22:755–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sriamornsak P, Burapapadh K, Puttipipatkhachorn S, Nunthanid J (2008) Effect of acidic medium on swelling and release behaviors of chitosan-reinforced calcium pectinate gel beads. Silpakorn Univ Sci Technol J 2(1):37–44Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sugahara Y, Takahisa O (2001) Synthesis of starch graft-polyacrylonitrile hydrolyzate and its characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 82:1437–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Suo AL, Qian JM, Yao Y, Zhang WG (2007) Synthesis and properties of carboxymethyl cellulose-graft-poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) as a novel cellulose-based superabsorbent. J Appl Polym Sci 103:1382–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tomsic B, Simoncic B, Orel B, Vilcnik A, Spreizer H (2007) Biodegradability of cellulose fabric modified by imidazolidinone. Carbohydr Polym 69:478–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Trout TJ, Sojka RE, Lentz RD (1995) Polyacrylamide effect on furrows erosion and infiltration. Trans ASAE 38:761–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu L, Liu M, Liang R (2008) Preparation and properties of a double-coated slow-release NPK compound with superabsorbent and water retention. Biores Technol 99:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yazdani-Pedram M, Retuert J, Quijada R (2000) Hydrogels based on modified chitosan, 1. Synthesis and swelling behavior of poly(acrylic acid) grafted chitosan. Macromol Chem Phys 201:923–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yazdani F, Allahdadi I, Akbari GA (2007) Impact of superabsorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pak J Biol Sci 10:4190–4196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raineesh Sharma
    • 1
  • Jaya Bajpai
    • 1
  • A. K. Bajpai
    • 1
  • Somen Acharya
    • 2
  • Bhuvanesh Kumar
    • 2
  • R. K. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.Bose Memorial Research Laboratory, Department of ChemistryGovernment Autonomous Science CollegeJabalpurIndia
  2. 2.Defence Institute of High Altitude ResearchLeh-LadakhIndia

Personalised recommendations