Agricultural Research

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 148–154 | Cite as

Modeling the Effect of Temperature and Precipitation on Crop Residue Potential for the North Central Region of the United States

  • Rajesh Chintala
  • Gemechis D Djira
  • Mitra L Devkota
  • Rishi Prasad
  • Sandeep Kumar
Full-Length Research Article


In an effort to advance fuel security in this era of increasing fuel demand and climate change, crop residue can play an important role by serving as an alternative source of biofuel feedstock. Crop grain yield and residue production are tied to the changing climate over regional and global scale. Precipitation and temperature are among the prime climate variables that drive agricultural production across the globe. This study was carried out to understand the effect of temperature and precipitation on spatial distribution of crop residue yield potential at regional scale. Spatial autoregressive models were fitted for county level crop residue yield potential (as a major potential biomass feedstock) in the north central region of the United States using daily mean temperature and total precipitation during the crop growing season. The results of this observational study found the linear increasing trend in crop residue yield potential in most of the states across north central region of USA. Crop residue potential was also identified to have significant spatial variability. The influences of temperature and precipitation on crop residue yield potential exhibited significant interactions. Positive interaction effects were observed in states including Iowa, North Dakota, and Wisconsin. Negative interaction effects of daily mean temperature and total precipitation were observed in states including Illinois and Indiana. These results emphasize that the availability of crop residues for biofuels feedstocks will be sensitive to climatic variability and that these sensitivities will vary geographically.


Crop residue Biomass feedstock Time series data Statistical model Spatial variability Interannual variability 



This research was supported by funding from the North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at South Dakota State University through a Grant provided by the US Department of Energy Office of Biomass Programs under Award Number DE-FC36-05GO85041.


  1. 1.
    Bakker MM, Grovers G, Ewert F, Rounsevell M, Jones R (2005) Variability in regional wheat yields as a function of climate, soil and economic variables: assessing the risk of confounding. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Challinor AJ, Slingo JM, Wheeler TR, Craufurd PQ, Grimes DIF (2003) Toward a combined seasonal weather and crop productivity forecasting system: determination of the working spatial scale. J Appl Meteorol 42:175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chintala R, Wimberly MC, Djira GD, Tulbure MG (2013) Interannual variability of crop residue potential in the north central region of the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 49:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haining R (1990) Spatial data analysis in the social and environmental sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kendall MG, Stuart A (1963) The advance theory of statistics. Hafner Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lennon JJ (2000) Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography 23:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loebell DB, Asner GP (2003) Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S. agricultural yields. Science 299:1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2:004000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller J, Franklin J, Aspinall R (2007) Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models. Ecol Model 202:225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monteith JL (1981) Presidential address to the royal meteorological society. Q J R Meteorol Soc 107:749–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Monteith JL (1996) The quest for balance in crop modeling. Agron J 88:695–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Porter JR, Semenov MA (2005) Crop responses to climatic variation. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:2021–2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reidsma P, Ewert F, Lanink AO, Leemans R (2009) Vulnerability and adaptation of European farmers: a multi-level analysis of yield and income response to climate variability. Reg Environ Change 9:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schlenker W, Roberts MJ (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15594–15598PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Soussana JF, Graux AI, Tubiello FN (2010) Improving the use of modeling for projections of climate change impacts on crops and pastures. J Exp Bot 61:2217–2228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tobbler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) (2009). Agricultural statistics data base.
  20. 20.
    USDOE–USDA (2002a) The vision for bioenergy and biobased products in the United States. Biomass Technical Advisory Committee. DOE–EERE, Washington, DC. Accessed 30 July 2006
  21. 21.
    USDOE–USDA (2002b) Roadmap for biomass technologies in the United States. Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee. Accessed 30 July 2005
  22. 22.
    Williams CL, Liebman M, Edwards JW, James DE, Singer JW, Arritt R, Herzmann D (2008) Patterns of regional yield stability in association with regional environmental characteristics. Crop Sci 48:1545–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajesh Chintala
    • 1
  • Gemechis D Djira
    • 2
  • Mitra L Devkota
    • 2
  • Rishi Prasad
    • 3
  • Sandeep Kumar
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plant ScienceSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA
  3. 3.Soil and Water Science DepartmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Plant ScienceSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations