, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 38–41 | Cite as

Optimale Therapie bei Vorhofflimmern


  • Kyoung-Ryul Julian ChunEmail author
  • Stefano Bordignon
  • Boris Schmidt
Fortbildung Schwerpunkt Kardiologie

Die Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern (VHF) repräsentiert das effektivste Verfahren zur erfolgreichen Rhythmuskontrolle und wird für therapierefraktäres paroxysmales VHF in den Leitlinien empfohlen. Die FIRE AND ICE-Studie konnte die Gleichwertigkeit des Kryoballons zur Radiofrequenz-Ablation für paroxysmales VHF nachweisen.


  1. 1.
    Kannel WB et al. Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1018–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ostrander LD et al. Electrocardiographic findings among the adult population of a total natrural community, Tecumseh, Michigan. Circulation. 1965;31:888–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kirchhof P et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Piccini JP et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:626–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morillo CA et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311:692–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calkins H et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–e444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin D et al. Electrophysiologic findings and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing third or more catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:371–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chun KRJ, et al. The “single big cryoballoon” technique for acute pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective observational single centre study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chun KJ et al. Single transseptal big Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation using an inner lumen mapping catheter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2012;35:1304–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heeger CH et al. Time-to-effect guided pulmonary vein isolation utilizing the third-generation versus second generation cryoballoon: One year clinical success. Cardiol J. 2018; Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fürnkranz A et al. Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel third-generation cryoballoon. Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2016;18:1795–800Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuck KH et al. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fürnkranz A et al. Improved procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel second-generation cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:492–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Providencia R et al. Results from a multicentre comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: is cryoablation more reproducible? Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2017;19:48–57Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bordignon S et al. High rate of durable pulmonary vein isolation after second-generation cryoballoon ablation: analysis of repeat procedures. Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2015;17:725–31Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reddy VY et al. Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Cryoballoon Ablation: Results from the Sustained PV Isolation with Arctic Front Advance (SUPIR) Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koektuerk B et al. Cryoballoon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Outcome Using Second Generation Cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1073–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boveda S et al. Single-Procedure Outcomes and Quality-of-Life Improvement 12 Months Post-Cryoballoon Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the Multicenter CRYO4PERSISTENT AF Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:1440–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmidt B et al. Laser Balloon or Wide-Area Circumferential Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2017;10.
  20. 20.
    Bordignon S et al. Durable single shot cryoballoon isolation of the left atrial appendage followed by percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:751–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yorgun H et al. Left atrial appendage isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation: one-year clinical outcome after cryoballoon-based ablation. Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2017;19:758–68Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miyazaki S et al. Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Second-Generation Cryoballoon in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Outcome Using a Single Big-Balloon 3-Minute Freeze Technique. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1375–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ciconte G et al. Single 3-Minute versus Double 4-Minute Freeze Strategy for Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation: A Single-Center Experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:796–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chun KRJ et al. Individualized cryoballoon energy pulmonary vein isolation guided by real-time pulmonary vein recordings, the randomized ICE-T trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:495–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dorwarth U et al. Pulmonary vein electrophysiology during cryoballoon ablation as a predictor for procedural success. J Interv Card Electrophysiol Int J Arrhythm Pacing. 2011;32:205–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aryana A et al. Procedural and biophysical indicators of durable pulmonary vein isolation during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:424–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cappato R et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:32–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chun KRJ et al. Complications in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in 3,000 Consecutive Procedures: Balloon Versus Radiofrequency Current Ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:154–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fürnkranz A et al. Reduced incidence of esophageal lesions by luminal esophageal temperature-guided second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:268–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghosh J et al. Immediate balloon deflation for prevention of persistent phrenic nerve palsy during pulmonary vein isolation by balloon cryoablation. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:646–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Franceschi F et al. Diaphragmatic electromyography during cryoballoon ablation: a novel concept in the prevention of phrenic nerve palsy. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:885–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nagase T et al. Low Risk of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Contemporary Atrial Fibrillation Ablation- Lessons From Repeat Procedures After Radiofrequency Current, Cryoballoon, and Laser Balloon. Circ J Off J Jpn Circ Soc. 2018;82:1558–65Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyoung-Ryul Julian Chun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefano Bordignon
    • 1
  • Boris Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien — CCBMed. Klinik III MarkuskrankenhausFrankfurtDeutschland

Personalised recommendations