hautnah dermatologie

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 32–36 | Cite as

Update Varikosen 2018

Endovenöse Therapieverfahren: State of the Art

Fortbildung

In der Behandlung des Krampfaderleidens werden zunehmend endovenöse Methoden eingesetzt. Um einen Qualitätsverlust zu vermeiden, gehören die nur scheinbar einfachen endovenösen Verfahren in die Hände erfahrener Phlebologen und/oder Ärzte mit fundierten phlebologischen und Duplex-sonografischen Kenntnissen.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Rabe E, Pannier F: Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders. In: Gloviciki P (editor): Handbook of venous disorders. Hodder Arnold, 2009; 105–10Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Markovic JN et al. Update on Radiofrequency Ablation. Pers Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2009; 21: 82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Disselhoff BC et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with and without ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction: 2-year results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36: 713–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flessenkämper I et al. Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared to high ligation and stripping for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial with up to 6 years follow-up. Phlebology 2016; 31: 23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Creton D et al. Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24: 360–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spreafico G et al. Laser saphenous ablations in more than 1,000 limbs with long-term duplex examination follow-up. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25: 71–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mozes G et al. Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 130–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schaeffer N, Hartmann K et al. Appositionsthrombus als Komplikation endovenöser Katheterverfahren (Post ablation thrombus extension (PATE)). Phlebologie 2-2018 (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noppeney T. Ergebnisse nach Radiofrequenzobliteration. Phlebologie 2010; 39: 72–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamann SAS et al. Five Year Results of Great Saphenous Vein Treatment: A Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54: 760–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Endovenöse Verfahren, Minimalinvasive Therapie der Varikosis, Schattauer Verlag 2015, K. Hartmann (Hrsg.), Jens Alm, Franz Xaver Breu, Uldis Maurins, Felizitas Pannier, Stefanie Reich-Schupke.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Disselhoff BC et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1231–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gauw SA et al. Five-year fallow-up of a randomized, controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great spahenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980nm) using local tumescent anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63: 420–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rasmussen L et al. Randomized clinical trial comparin endovenous laser ablation and stripping oft he great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years. J Vasc Surg 2013; 587: 421–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rass K et al. Same Site Recurrence ist More Frequent After Endovenous Laser Ablation Compared with Higt Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein: 5 year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50: 648–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mumme A et al. High ligation oft he saphenofemoral junction is necessary! Phlebologie 2009; 3: 99–102Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al Shakarchi J et al. Effect of tumescent anesthesia and patient positioning on laser tip junctional distance during endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.08.013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Venenzentrum FreiburgFreiburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations