AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: what a clinician should know
Enterobacterales are among the most common causes of bacterial infections in the community and among hospitalized patients, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains have emerged as a major threat to human health. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is typical of MDRs, being mainly due to the production of extended spectrum β-lactamases or AmpC-type β-lactamases.
The objective of this paper is to review the epidemiological impact, diagnostic issues and treatment options with AmpC producers.
AmpC enzymes encoded by resident chromosomal genes (cAmpCs) are produced by some species (e.g., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens), while plasmid-encoded AmpCs (pAmpCs) can be encountered also in species that normally do not produce cAmpCs (e.g., Salmonella enterica, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca) or produce them at negligible levels (e.g., Escherichia coli). Production of AmpCs can be either inducible or constitutive, resulting in different resistance phenotypes. Strains producing cAmpCs in an inducible manner (e.g., Enterobacter spp.) usually appear susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins, which are poor inducers, but can easily yield mutants constitutively producing the enzyme which are resistant to these drugs (which are good substrates), resulting in treatment failures. pAmpCs are usually constitutively expressed. Production of pAmpCs is common in community-acquired infections, while cAmpC producers are mainly involved in healthcare-associated infections.
To date, there is no conclusive evidence about the most appropriate treatment for AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. Carbapenems are often the preferred option, especially for severe infections in which adequate source control is not achieved, but cefepime is also supported by substantial clinical evidences as an effective carbapenem-sparing option.
KeywordsBeta-lactamases AmpC Enterobacterales Enterobacter Gram negative Antibiotic resistance
This work was performed as part of our routine work. No external funding was required for the project.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
In the past 2 years, C.T. has been paid for lectures on behalf of Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Angelini, Gilead, and Astellas. G.M.R. has received research grants from Angelini, Basilea, Menarini, Merck, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Rempex, Shionogi, VenatorX, Zambon; has received congress lecture fees from Angelini, Basilea, Merck, Pfizer, Zambon; has received consultancy fees from Angelini, Menarini, Merck, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Rempex, Shionogi, Zambon. The other authors have nothing to declare. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
- 1.Giani T, Antonelli A, Caltagirone M, Mauri C, Nicchi J, Arena F, et al. The AMCLI-CoSA survey participants. Evolving beta-lactamase epidemiology in Enterobacteriaceae from Italian nationwide surveillance, October 2013: KPC-carbapenemase spreading among outpatients. Euro Surveill. 2017;22:30583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Chaubey VP, Pitout JD, Dalton B, Gregson DB, Ross T, Laupland KB. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of bloodstream infections due to AmpC β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: an active surveillance cohort in a large centralized Canadian region. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hilty M, Sendi P, Seiffert SN, Droz S, Perreten V, Hujer AM, et al. Characterisation and clinical features of Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infections occurring at a tertiary care university hospital in Switzerland: is cefepime adequate therapy? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;41:236–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. EUCAST guidelines for detection of resistance mechanisms and specific resistances of clinical and/or epidemiological importance. Version 2.01 July (2017). http://www.eucast.org.
- 21.Drinkovic D, Morris AJ, Dyet K, Bakker S, Heffernan H. Plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infection in the Auckland community likely to be resistant to commonly prescribed antimicrobials. N Z Med J. 2015;128:50–9.Google Scholar
- 22.Harris PNA, Ben Zakour NL, Roberts LW, Wailan AM, Zowawi HM, Tambyah PA, et al. MERINO Trial investigators. Whole genome analysis of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli from bloodstream infections in Australia, New Zealand and Singapore: high prevalence of CMY-2 producers and ST131 carrying blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-27. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:634–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Conen A, Frei R, Adler H, Dangel M, Fux CA, Widmer AF. Microbiological screening is necessary to distinguish carriers of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae because of clinical similarity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Harris PN, Wei JY, Shen AW, Abdile AA, Paynter S, Huxley RR, et al. Carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter, Citrobacter or Serratia species: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Hawkey PM, Warren RE, Livermore DM, McNulty CAM, Enoch DA, Otter JA, Wilson APR. Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: report of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy/Healthcare Infection Society/British Infection Association Joint Working Party. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:2–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Paterson D, Harris P. Pilot RCT of Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC Beta-lactamase Producing Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia Marcescens in Low-risk Patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02437045. http://clinicaltrials.gov.