Colonoscopic versus nasogastric fecal transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a review and pooled analysis
- 1.8k Downloads
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been demonstrated to be highly effective for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). However, the best route of administration has not been established. We present a pooled analysis of the reported cases of CDI treated with FMT via colonoscopy or nasogastric tube (NGT) to evaluate treatment efficacy.
PubMed was searched for English-written articles published up to December 2011. Studies that reported cases of FMT for recurrent CDI using either colonoscopy or NGT-guided fecal infusion were reviewed.
A total of 182 patients from 12 published studies were identified; 148 patients received FMT via colonoscopy (colonoscopy group) and 34 patients received FMT via NGT (NGT group). The median age in the colonoscopy group as compared with the NGT group was 72 and 82 years, respectively. There were differences regarding pre-FMT treatment for CDI; 134 patients (90.5 %, 134/148) received lavage with/without antibiotic in the colonoscopy group and 34 patients (100.0 %, 34/34) received antibiotic without lavage in the NGT group, P < 0.001. A higher stool volume was used for FMT in the colonoscopy group (121 patients, 81.8 %, used 100–400 ml) than in the NGT group (33 patients, 97.0 %, used <100 ml), P < 0.001. The treatment efficacy did not differ significantly; 93.2 % (138/148) success for the colonoscopy group as compared to 85.3 % success (29/34) for the NGT group, P = 0.162. Recurrence of CDI after FMT was also similar in both the colonoscopy group (8/148 5.4 %) versus the NGT group (2/34, 5.9 %), P = 1.000.
Despite procedural differences, FMT via colonoscopy or NGT appears to be highly effective and safe for the management of recurrent CDI.
KeywordsFecal microbiota transplantation Clostridium difficile Colonoscopy Nasogastric tube
Conflict of interest
- 6.Wenisch JM, Schmid D, Tucek G, Kuo HW, Allerberger F, Michl V, Tesik P, Laferl H, Wenisch C. A prospective cohort study on hospital mortality due to Clostridium difficile infection. Infection. 2012 Apr 17. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 7.Bakken JS, Borody T, Brandt LJ, Brill JV, Demarco DC, Franzos MA, Kelly C, Khoruts A, Louie T, Martinelli LP, Moore TA, Russell G, Surawicz C; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Workgroup. Treating Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota transplantation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1044–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wettstein A, Borody TJ, Leis S, Chongnan J, Torres M, Hills LA. Fecal bacteriotherapy: an effective treatment for relapsing symptomatic Clostridium difficile infection. Gut. 2007;56:A303.Google Scholar
- 22.Duplessis CA, You D, Johnson M, Speziale A. Efficacious outcome employing fecal bacteriotherapy in severe Crohn’s colitis complicated by refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Infection. 2011 Dec 8. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 24.Mattila E, Uusitalo-Seppälä R, Wuorela M, Lehtola L, Nurmi H, Ristikankare M, Moilanen V, Salminen K, Seppälä M, Mattila PS, Anttila VJ, Arkkila P. Fecal transplantation, through colonoscopy, is effective therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:490–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar