Advertisement

Infection

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 159–166 | Cite as

Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence, genotype distribution and identification of the new Swedish variant in Southern Germany

  • N. Fieser
  • U. Simnacher
  • Y. Tausch
  • S. Werner-Belak
  • S. Ladenburger-Strauß
  • H. von Baum
  • U. Reischl
  • A. Essig
Clinical and Epidemiological Study

Abstract

Purpose

In Germany, reliable data about the prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections, causative genotypes, as well as corresponding clinical, demographic and behavioural information are sparse. We, therefore, performed a prospective prevalence study including 1,003 sexually active volunteers of a Southern German city.

Methods

Study participants completed a standardised questionnaire and provided first void urine samples for analysis. Our screening strategy included the performance of two nucleic acid amplification tests with different target genes, enabling the detection of the new Swedish variant of C. trachomatis (nvCT). Direct genotyping of positive specimens was performed by sequence analysis of the ompA gene.

Results and Conclusion

The overall prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 4.2 % in women and 4.6 % in men. A relatively high prevalence of 8.3 % was found in men older than 25 years. Never using condoms was an independent risk factor for infection. The most common symptom was discharge; however, 64.5 % of infected females and all of the infected men were asymptomatic, supporting the need for screening programmes. The most frequently encountered genotypes were E (46.5 %), F (20.9 %) and K (14.0 %). Since the nvCT was detected in one female student, this is one of the rare studies that reports on the molecular identification of nvCT apart from Sweden.

Keywords

Chlamydia trachomatis Chlamydia screening Genotypes New variant of C. trachomatis (nvCT) STD 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Eberhard Straube (Institute of Medical Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena) for providing the control DNA of the nvCT. Special thanks go to Cornelia Otto and Stephanie Kurz (Public Health Departments of Ulm and Neu-Ulm), Christine Meißle (Health Care School, University Hospital Ulm), Katja Schlaupitz (General Practice, Neu-Ulm), Alexander Rauh (German Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm) and Anne-Marie Albuszies (TÜV SÜD Life Service GmbH) for the recruitment of study participants and sample collection. We thank Corinna Foddis, Sonja Rothenberger, Carola Maier and Beate Wirths (Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Ulm) for their expert technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

This study was supported by Hain Life science and Roche Diagnostics who provided test kits and financial support in part.

References

  1. 1.
    Land JA, Van Bergen JEAM, Morré SA, Postma MJ. Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:189–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peipert JF. Clinical practice. Genital chlamydial infections. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2424–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Low N; SCREen project team. Publication of report on chlamydia control activities in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2008;13. pii: 18924.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson RE, Newhall WJ, Papp JR, Knapp JS, Black CM, Gift TL, Steece R, Markowitz LE, Devine OJ, Walsh CM, Wang S, Gunter DC, Irwin KL, DeLisle S, Berman SM. Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections—2002. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51:1–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaydos C, Essig A. Chlamydiaceae. In: Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington: ASM Press; 2011. p. 986–1000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griesinger G, Gille G, Klapp C, von Otte S, Diedrich K. Sexual behaviour and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in German female urban adolescents, 2004. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:436–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clad A, Prillwitz J, Hintz KC, Mendel R, Flecken U, Schulte-Mönting J, Petersen EE. Discordant prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic couples screened using urine ligase chain reaction. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001;20:324–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gille G, Meyer T, Mylonas I, Straube E. Chlamydia trachomatis-screening—Wunsch und Wirklichkeit. Mikrobiologe. 2011;21:63–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ripa T, Nilsson PA. A Chlamydia trachomatis strain with a 377-bp deletion in the cryptic plasmid causing false-negative nucleic acid amplification tests. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:255–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ripa T, Nilsson P. A variant of Chlamydia trachomatis with deletion in cryptic plasmid: implications for use of PCR diagnostic tests. Euro Surveill. 2006;11:E061109.2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Unemo M, Clarke IN. The Swedish new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:62–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herrmann B, Törner A, Low N, Klint M, Nilsson A, Velicko I, Söderblom T, Blaxhult A. Emergence and spread of Chlamydia trachomatis variant, Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1462–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reischl U, Drosten C, Geißdörfer W, Göbel U, Hoffmann KS, Mauch H, Meyer Th, Moter A, von Müller L, Panning M, Rabenau HF, Reiter-Owona I, Roth A, Weitz M. Nukleinsäure-amplifikationstechniken (NAT). In: Podbielski A, Herrmann M, Kniehl E, Mauch H, Rüssmann H, editors. MIQ: Qualitätsstandards in der Mikrobiologisch-Infektiologischen Diagnostik. Munich: Fishcher; 2011. p. 22–38.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Møller JK, Pedersen LN, Persson K. Comparison of Gen-probe transcription-mediated amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR assays for detection of wild-type and mutant plasmid strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3892–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seth-Smith HM, Harris SR, Persson K, Marsh P, Barron A, Bignell A, Bjartling C, Clark L, Cutcliffe LT, Lambden PR, Lennard N, Lockey SJ, Quail MA, Salim O, Skilton RJ, Wang Y, Holland MJ, Parkhill J, Thomson NR, Clarke IN. Co-evolution of genomes and plasmids within Chlamydia trachomatis and the emergence in Sweden of a new variant strain. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jurstrand M, Falk L, Fredlund H, Lindberg M, Olcén P, Andersson S, Persson K, Albert J, Bäckman A. Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 genotypes among sexually transmitted disease patients in Sweden. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3915–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simms I, Talebi A, Rhia J, Horner P, French RS, Sarah R, Macintosh M. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36:522–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Chlamydia control in Europe. ECDC Guidance. 2009. p. 1–18. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/0906_GUI_Chlamydia_Control_in_Europe.pdf
  19. 19.
    Klavs I, Rodrigues LC, Wellings K, Kese D, Hayes R. Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population of Slovenia: serious gaps in control. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;80:121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Bergen J, Götz HM, Richardus JH, Hoebe CJPA, Broer J, Coenen AJT; PILOT CT study group. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:17–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Novak DP, Karlsson RB. Simplifying chlamydia testing: an innovative Chlamydia trachomatis testing approach using the internet and a home sampling strategy: population based study. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:142–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paget WJ, Zbinden R, Ritzler E, Zwahlen M, Lengeler C, Stürchler D, Matter HCP; Swiss Sentinel Surveillance Network of Gynecologists. National laboratory reports of Chlamydia trachomatis seriously underestimate the frequency of genital chlamydial infections among women in Switzerland. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:715–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gille G, Klapp C, Diedrich K, Schäfer A, Moter A, Griesinger G, Kirschner R. Chlamydien—eine heimliche Epidemie unter Jugendlichen. Prävalenzbeobachtung bei jungen Mädchen in Berlin. Dtsch Ärztebl. 2005;102:2021–5.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baud D, Jaton K, Bertelli C, Kulling J-P, Greub G. Low prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic young Swiss men. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sakem B, Michel R, Nydegger UE, Radjenovic D, Wydler M, Risch M, Risch L. Diagnostic relevance of simultaneous testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Infection. 2011;39:231–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Böhm I, Gröning A, Sommer B, Müller H-W, Krawczak M, Glaubitz R. A German Chlamydia trachomatis screening program employing semi-automated real-time PCR: results and perspectives. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:S27–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lysén M, Osterlund A, Rubin CJ, Persson T, Persson I, Herrmann B. Characterization of ompA genotypes by sequence analysis of DNA from all detected cases of Chlamydia trachomatis infections during 1 year of contact tracing in a Swedish County. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1641–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Byrne GI. Chlamydia trachomatis strains and virulence: rethinking links to infection prevalence and disease severity. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:S126–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Klint M, Hadad R, Christerson L, Loré B, Anagrius C, Österlund A, Larsson I, Sylvan S, Fredlund H, Unemo M, Herrmann B. Prevalence trends in Sweden for the new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:683–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bjartling C, Osser S, Johnsson A, Persson K. Clinical manifestations and epidemiology of the new genetic variant of Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36:529–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Westh H, Jensen JS. Low prevalence of the new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis in Denmark. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84:546–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Savage EJ, Ison CA, van de Laar MJ; ESSTI network. Results of a Europe-wide investigation to assess the presence of a new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis. Euro Surveill. 2007;12:E3–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Niemi S, Hiltunen-Back E, Puolakkainen M. Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes and the Swedish new variant among urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis strains in Finland. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:481890. doi: 10.1155/2011/481890.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reischl U, Straube E, Unemo M. The Swedish new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis (nvCT) remains undetected by many European laboratories as revealed in the recent PCR/NAT ring trial organised by INSTAND e.V., Germany. Euro Surveill. 2009;14. pii: 19302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Fieser
    • 1
    • 2
  • U. Simnacher
    • 1
  • Y. Tausch
    • 1
  • S. Werner-Belak
    • 1
  • S. Ladenburger-Strauß
    • 3
  • H. von Baum
    • 1
  • U. Reischl
    • 4
  • A. Essig
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Medical Microbiology and HygieneUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.Gaertner and Colleagues LaboratoriesRavensburgGermany
  3. 3.Gynaecological PracticeSendenGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Medical Microbiology and HygieneUniversity Hospital RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations