PCR offers no advantage over culture for microbiologic diagnosis in cellulitis
- First Online:
Most cases of cellulitis are traditionally attributed to β-hemolytic Streptococcus and Staphylococcus species, although in most cases, no organism is identified. Development of PCR using the conserved bacterial 16 S rRNA DNA permits identification of bacteria independent of conventional culture approaches and prior use of antibiotics.
We used PCR-based techniques to identify cellulitis etiology using aspirate samples from affected skin. Saline was infiltrated and aspirated at the site of greatest erythema or at the cellulitic border. Samples were tested for 16 S rRNA DNA, and organism-specific probes used to identify bacteria commonly seen in skin infections.
Aspirates from 32 patients were studied, and 16 S rRNA DNA was detected in nine of these patient samples (28.1 %). Bacterial species were identified by PCR methods in six of these nine samples (66.6 %), with S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) identified in four and two, respectively, of these samples. Of the patients with positive aspirate bacterial cultures (3/9, 33.3 %), S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) were present on cultures of two of the three (both 66.6 %) positive samples. Only in one of the three positive bacterial cultures did the PCR method detect the same organism as was detected by culture. Among patients with positive provider-collected clinical cultures, MRSA was the predominant organism (11/18, 61.1 %) and when present, it was found as the sole organism. Where S. aureus or Streptococcus species were detected by molecular methods, clinical cultures yielded a positive result as well.
PCR-based techniques do not appear to be more sensitive than aspirate cultures for the detection of pathogens in cellulitis.
KeywordsCellulitis Eukaryotic PCR 16S rRNA Skin and skin structure infection Skin and soft tissue infection
- 11.Linscott A.J. Specimen collection, transport and acceptability. In: Garcia LS (ed) Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, 3rd edn. American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Press, Herndon, pp 2.1.1–2.1.6, 2010.Google Scholar
- 12.Sharp SE, Bowler PG, Church DL. Wound cultures. In: Garcia LS (ed) Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, 3rd edn. American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Press, Herndon, pp 3.13, 2010.Google Scholar
- 14.Goldgeier MH. The microbial evaluation of acute cellulitis. Cutis. 1983;31(649–4):656.Google Scholar
- 15.Patel Wylie F, Kaplan SL, Mason EO, Allen CH. Needle aspiration for the etiologic diagnosis of children with cellulitis in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011;50(6):503–7.Google Scholar