Clinical benefit of infectious diseases consultation: a monocentric prospective cohort study
- 219 Downloads
To determine the association of clinical outcomes with the adherence to Infectious Diseases Consultation (IDC) recommendations.
From March to August 2009, all patients hospitalized in our hospital, for whom an IDC was requested, were prospectively enrolled. The adherence to recommendations was ascertained after 72 h from the IDC. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical cure rate 1 month after the IDC, according to the adherence to IDC recommendations.
An IDC was requested for 258 inpatients. The infectious disease (ID) was most often non-severe (66 %), community-acquired (62 %), and already under treatment (47 %). IDC proposals were most often formulated via a formal consultation (57 %). Physicians’ adherence to IDC recommendations was 87 % for diagnostic tests and 90 % for antibiotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, severe infections and direct consultation were independently associated with increased odds of adherence to recommendations for performing diagnostic tests (odds ratios 5.4 and 4.0, respectively). The overall clinical cure rate was 84 % and this did not differ according to the adherence to IDC recommendations for diagnostic tests (84.3 vs. 71.4 %, p = 0.15) and antimicrobial treatment (84.8 vs. 77.8 %, p = 0.34).
Some limitations of the study may explain the lack of evidence of a clinical benefit, such as the very high level of adherence to IDC recommendations and the low proportion of severe infections. However, clinical improvement was always better when recommendations were followed. Therefore, further larger randomized multicentric studies including more patients suffering from more severe IDs may be needed in order to demonstrate a clinical impact.
KeywordsInfectious diseases consultation IDC Adherence to recommendations Clinical outcomes
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest were reported by any of the authors. No funding was received for this work.
- 9.Roberts RR, Hota B, Ahmad I, Scott RD 2nd, Foster SD, Abbasi F, Schabowski S, Kampe LM, Ciavarella GG, Supino M, Naples J, Cordell R, Levy SB, Weinstein RA. Hospital and societal costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago teaching hospital: implications for antibiotic stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1175–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE Jr, Gerding DN, Weinstein RA, Burke JP, Huskins WC, Paterson DL, Fishman NO, Carpenter CF, Brennan PJ, Billeter M, Hooton TM. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:159–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Davey P, Brown E, Fenelon L, Finch R, Gould I, Hartman G, Holmes A, Ramsay C, Taylor E, Wilcox M, Wiffen P. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD003543.Google Scholar
- 16.Fowler VG Jr, Sanders LL, Sexton DJ, Kong L, Marr KA, Gopal AK, Gottlieb G, McClelland RS, Corey GR. Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:478–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar