Advertisement

Infection

, 37:534 | Cite as

Secular Trend and Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolates in Switzerland 1997–2007

  • L. Blaettler
  • D. Mertz
  • R. Frei
  • L. Elzi
  • A. F. Widmer
  • M. Battegay
  • U. FlückigerEmail author
Brief Report

Abstract

Background:

Antibacterial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates of urinary infections, mainly to fluoroquinolones, is emerging. The aim of our study was to identify the secular trend of resistant E. coli isolates and to characterize the population at risk for colonization or infections with these organisms.

Patients and Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 3,430 E.coli first isolates of urine specimens from patients admitted to the University Hospital Basel in 1997, 2000, 2003, and 2007.

Results:

Resistance to ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and amoxicillin/clavulanate has increased over the 10-year study period (from 1.8% to 15.9%, 17.4% to 21.3%, and 9.5% to 14.5%, respectively). A detailed analysis of the 2007 data revealed that independent risk factors for ciprofloxacin resistance were age (5.3% < 35 years of age to 21.9% in patients > 75 years; odds ratio [OR] 1.29 per 10 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–1.45, p < 0.001) and male gender (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.05–2.41, p = 0.04). In contrast, nosocomial E. coli isolates were associated with lower odds of ciprofloxacin resistance (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.67, p < 0.001). The frequency of resistant isolate rates was not influenced by the clinical significance (i.e., colonization vs urinary tract infection, UTI) or by whether the urine was taken from a urinary catheter. Importantly, the increase in ciprofloxacin resistance paralleled the increase in ciprofloxacin consumption in Switzerland (Pearson’s correlation test R2= 0.998, p = 0.002). Of note, resistance was less frequent in isolates sent in by general practitioners. However, after adjustment for age and gender, only resistance against amoxicillin/clavulanate was found to be less frequent (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16–0.92, p = 0.03).

Conclusion:

Our study reveals that resistance rates have been increasing during the last decade. Published resistance rates may lack information due to important differences regarding age, gender, and probable origin of the isolates. Empirical therapy for UTI should be guided more on individual risk profile and local resistance data than on resistance data banks.

Keywords

Antimicrob Agent Resistance Rate Urinary Catheter Secular Trend Urine Specimen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Stamm WE, Norrby SR: Urinary tract infections: disease panorama and challenges. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: S1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hillier S, Bell J, Heginbothom M, Roberts Z, Dunstan F, Howard A, Mason B, Butler CC: When do general practitioners request urine specimens for microbiology analysis? The applicability of antibiotic resistance surveillance based on routinely collected data. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58: 1303–1306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colgan R, Johnson JR, Kuskowski M, Gupta K: A prospective study of risk factors for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in acute uncomplicated cystitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 167: 2201–2206.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falagas ME, Polemis M, Alexiou VG, Marini-Mastrogiannaki A, Kremastinou J, Vatopoulos AC: Antimicrobial resistance of Esherichia coli urinary isolates from primary care patients in Greece. Med Sci Monit 2008; 14: CR75–CR79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hooton TM, Scholes D, Gupta K, Stapleton AE, Roberts PL, Stamm WE: Amoxicillin-clavulanate vs ciprofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated cystitis in women: a randomized trial. JAMA 2005; 293: 949–955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta K, Hooton TM, Stamm WE: Increasing antimicrobial resistance and the management of uncomplicated communityacquired urinary tract infections. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 41–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karlowsky JA, Kelly LJ, Thornsberry C, Jones ME, Sahm DF: Trends in antimicrobial resistance among urinary tract infection isolates of Escherichia coli from female outpatients in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 2540–2545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alos JI, Serrano MG, Gomez-Garces JL, Perianes J: Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from community-acquired urinary tract infections in relation to demographic and clinical data. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005; 11: 199–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang ES, Stafford RS: National patterns in the treatment of urinary tract infections in women by ambulatory care physicians. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 41–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Warren JW, Abrutyn E, Hebel JR, Johnson JR, Schaeffer AJ, Stamm WE: Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 745–758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taur Y, Smith MA: Adherence to the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 769–774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stamm WE: Evaluating guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 775–776.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gupta K, Hooton TM, Stamm WE: Isolation of fluoroquinoloneresistant rectal Escherichia coli after treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 243–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gagliotti C, Nobilio L, Moro ML: Emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from outpatient urine samples. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007; 13: 328–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Becnel Boyd L, Atmar RL, Randall GL, Hamill RJ, Steffen D, Zechiedrich L: Increased fluoroquinolone resistance with time in Escherichia coli from >17,000 patients at a large county hospital as a function of time, culture site, age, sex, and location. BMC Infect Dis 2008; 8: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arslan H, Azap OK, Ergonul O, Timurkaynak F: Risk factors for ciprofloxacin resistance among Escherichia coli strains isolated from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Turkey. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 914–918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sannes MR, Belongia EA, Kieke B, Smith K, Kieke A, Vandermause M, Bender J, Clabots C, Winokur P, Johnson JR: Predictors of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in the feces of vegetarians and newly hospitalized adults in Minnesota and Wisconsin. J Infect Dis 2008; 197: 430–434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sandel DC, Wang CT, Kessler S: Urinary tract infections and a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli clonal group. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 535–536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McDonald LC, Chen FJ, Lo HJ, Yin HC, Lu PL, Huang CH, Chen P, Lauderdale TL, Ho M: Emergence of reduced susceptibility and resistance to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli in Taiwan and contributions of distinct selective pressures. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45: 3084–3091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brown PD, Freeman A, Foxman B: Prevalence and predictors of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates in Michigan. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 1061–1066.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blot S, Vandijck D, Vandewoude K, Depuydt P, Vogelaers D, Peleman R: Comment on: impact of antibiotic resistance and of adequate empirical antibiotic treatment in the prognosis of patients with Escherichia coli bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 1402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peralta G, Sanchez MB, Garrido JC, De Benito I, Cano ME, Martinez-Martinez L, Roiz MP: Impact of antibiotic resistance and of adequate empirical antibiotic treatment in the prognosis of patients with Escherichia coli bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 855–863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hindler JF, Evangelista AT, Jenkins SG, Johnston J, Master R, McGowan Jr. JE, Stelling J: Analysis and presentation of cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility test data; approved guideline (2nd edn). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA 2005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nys S, Terporten PH, Hoogkamp-Korstanje JA, Stobberingh EE: Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from urology services in The Netherlands (1998–2005). J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 62: 126–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kahlmeter G: Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens in uncomplicated cystitis in Europe. The ECO.SENS study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 22(Suppl 2): 49–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Filippini M, Masiero G, Moschetti K: Socioeconomic determinants of regional differences in outpatient antibiotic consumption: evidence from Switzerland. Health Policy 2006; 78: 77–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ferech M, Coenen S, Malhotra-Kumar S, Dvorakova K, Hendrickx E, Suetens C, Goossens H: European surveillance of antimicrobial consumption (ESAC): outpatient quinolone use in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58: 423–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karpanoja P, Nyberg ST, Bergman M, Voipio T, Paakkari P, Huovinen P, Sarkkinen H: Connection between trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole use and resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 2480–2485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stelling JM, Travers K, Jones RN, Turner PJ, O’Brien TF, Levy SB: Integrating Escherichia coli antimicrobial susceptibility data from multiple surveillance programs. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 873–882.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Talan DA, Krishnadasan A, Abrahamian FM, Stamm WE, Moran GJ: Prevalence and risk factor analysis of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole- and fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli infection among emergency department patients with pyelonephritis. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47: 1150–1158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Blaettler
    • 1
  • D. Mertz
    • 1
  • R. Frei
    • 2
  • L. Elzi
    • 1
  • A. F. Widmer
    • 1
  • M. Battegay
    • 1
  • U. Flückiger
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital EpidemiologyUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Microbiology LaboratoryUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations