MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin

, Volume 154, Issue 13, pp 47–50 | Cite as

Wann ist die Chance auf Mutterschaft vertan?

Jugendliche Fassade garantiert keine Fertilität
  • Dunja Baston-Büst
  • Sören von Otte
  • Wolfgang Janni
  • Alexandra P. Hess
  • Jan-Steffen Krüssel
FORTBILDUNG SCHWERPUNKT
First Online:

Viele Frauen, die die Familienplanung immer weiter hinausschieben, verdrängen die Tatsache, dass ihre Fertilität etwa ab dem 35. Lebensjahr drastisch sinkt. Was heute über die „Biologie des reproduktiven Alters“ bekannt ist und mit welchen Methoden Frauen im kritischen Alter doch noch zu einem eigenen Kind verholfen werden kann, ist Thema des folgenden Beitrags.

Keywords - Reproductive aging

Age-related infertility in vitro fertilisation late motherhood delayed child-bearing 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Literatur ((bitte daneben stellen))

  1. (1).
    Adkins, R.M., Thomas, F., Tylavsky, F.A., Krushkal, J.: Parental ages and levels of DNA methylation in the newborn are correlated. BMC Med Genet. 12 (2011), 47ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Bottini, N., Meloni, G.F., Lucarelli, P., Amante, A., Saccucci, P., Gloria-Bottini, F., Bottini, E.: Risk of type 1 diabetes in childhood and maternal age at delivery, interaction with ACP1 and sex. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 21(4) (2005), 353–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Broekmans, F.J., Faddy, M.J., Scheffer, G., te Velde, E.R.: Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause. Menopause 11 (2004), 607–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Broekmans, F.J., Kwee, J., Hendricks, D.J., Mol, B.W., Lambalk, C.B.: A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 12 (2006), 685–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Brzechffa, P.R., Buyalos, R.P.: Female and male partner age and menotrophin requirements influence pregnancy rates with human menopausal gonadotrophin therapy in combination with intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 12 (1997): 29–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Corsan, G., Trias, A., Trout, S., Kemmann, E.: Ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination in women 40 years of age and older: is it worthwhile?. Hum Reprod 11 (1996), 1109–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    DIR Jahrbuch 2010 Modifizierter Nachdruck aus J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 2011; 8 (4): 253-80. J. Reproduktionsmed. Endokrinol 2011; 8 (Supplementum 2), 1-40Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Evers, J.L.: Female subfertility. Lancet 360 (2002), 151–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Faddy, M.J., Gosden, R.G.: A model conforming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women. Hum Reprod 11 (1996), 1484–1486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Fauser, B.C., Devroey, P., Macklon, M.S.: Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet 365 (2005), 1807–1816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Hendriks, D.J., Mol, B.W., Bancsi, L.F., te Velde, E.R., Broekmans, F.J.: Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a metaanalysis and comparison with basal folliclestimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril 83 (2005), 291–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/Tabellen/AltersgruppenFamilienstand.html?nn=50732.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Bevoelkerung/Geburten/Tabellen/GeburtenZiffer.html?nn=50738.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Johnson, J.A., Tough, S.: SOGC Committee Opinion Delayed child-bearing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 34 (2012), 80–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Johnson, J., Canning, J., Kaneko, T., Pru, J.K., Tilly, J.L.: Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature 428 (2004), 145–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Kerr, J.B., Duckett, R., Myers, M., Britt, K.L., Mladenovska, T., Findlay, J.K.: Quantification of healthy follicles in the neonatal and adult mouse ovary: evidence for maintenance of primordial follicle supply. Reproduction 132 (2006), 95–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    La Marca, A., Malmusi, S., Giulini, S., Tamaro, L.F., Orvieto, R., Levratti, P., Volpe, A.: Anti-Mullerian hormone plasma levels in spontaneous menstrual cycle and during treatment with FSH to induce ovulation. Hum Reprod 19 (2004), 2738–2741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Leridon, H.: Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod 19 (2004), 1548–1553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Leridon, H. Demographic effects of the introduction of steroid contraception in developed countries. Hum Reprod Update 12 (2006), 603–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Markstrom, E., Svensson, E.C., Shao, R., Svanberg, B., Billig, H.: Survival factors regulating ovarian apoptosis–dependence on follicle differentiation. Reproduction 123 (2002), 23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Roberts, S.E., Wotton, C.J., Williams, J.G., Griffith, M., Goldacre, M.J.: Perinatal and early life risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 17(6) (2011), 743–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Seifer, D.B., MacLaughlin, D.T., Christian, B.P., Feng, B., Shelden, R.M.: Early follicular serum mullerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril 77 (2002), 468–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Te Velde, E.R., Pearson, P.L.: The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update 8 (2002), 141–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Treloar, A.E., Boynton, R.E., Behn, B.G., Brown, B.W.: Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. Int J Fertil 12 (1967), 77–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Treloar, A.E.: Menstrual cyclicity and the premenopause. Maturitas 3 (1981), 249–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    White, Y.A.R., Woods D.C., Takai, Y., Ishihara O., Seki, H., Tilly, J.L.: Oocyte formation by mitotically active germ cells purified from ovaries of reproductive-age women. Nature Medicine, published online February 2012; doi:10.1038/nm.2669Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Urban & Vogel 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dunja Baston-Büst
    • 1
  • Sören von Otte
    • 2
  • Wolfgang Janni
    • 3
  • Alexandra P. Hess
    • 3
  • Jan-Steffen Krüssel
    • 3
  1. 1.Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine Universität, FrauenklinikUniversitäres interdisziplinäres Kinderwunschzentrum Düsseldorf (UniKiD)DüsseldorfDeutschland
  2. 2.KielDeutschland
  3. 3.DüsseldorfDeutschland

Personalised recommendations