MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin

, Volume 154, Issue 3, pp 74–77 | Cite as

Wo ist minimal invasiv wirklich besser?

Laparoskopische Verfahren in der Viszeralchirurgie
  • Marc-H. Dahlke
  • Martin Loss
  • Ayman Agha
  • Hans J. Schlitt
SEMINAR

Sind laparoskopische Verfahren in der Viszeralchirurgie in jedem Fall einem offenen Eingriff vorzuziehen? Im folgenden Beitrag haben wir aufgeführt, bei welchen Indikationen laparoskopische Verfahren zum Einsatz kommen können und welche Evidenz für oder gegen deren Einsatz spricht.

Keywords - Laparoscopic methods in visceral surgery — is minimal access surgery better than open surgery?

Appendectomy colorectal carcinoma pancreatectomy hepatic surgery 

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Coskun, I., et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: effect on pulmonary function tests. Hepatogastroenterology 47, 341–342 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harju, J., Kokki, H., Paakkonen, M., Karjalainen, K. & Eskelinen, M. Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: a prospective randomised study. Scand J Surg 99, 132–136 (2010).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johansson, M., et al. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92, 44–49 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keus, F., de Vries, J., Gooszen, H.G. & van Laarhoven, C.J. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: health status in a blind randomised trial. Surg Endosc 22, 1649–1659 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiviluoto, T., Siren, J., Luukkonen, P. & Kivilaakso, E. Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351, 321–325 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ros, A., et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234, 741–749 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ignacio, R.C., et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18, 334–337 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katkhouda, N., Mason, R.J. & Towfigh, S. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Adv Surg 40, 1–19 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katkhouda, N., Mason, R.J., Towfigh, S., Gevorgyan, A. & Essani, R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242, 439–448; discussion 448-450 (2005).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kouhia, S.T., et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg 97, 1395–1400 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moberg, A.C., et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92, 298–304 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olmi, S., Magnone, S., Bertolini, A. & Croce, E. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19, 1193–1195 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franks, P.J., et al. Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 95, 6–12 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jayne, D.G., et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopicassisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25, 3061–3068 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fleshman, J., et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246, 655-662; discussion 662-654 (2007).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Bree, S., et al. Faster recovery of gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopy and fast-track care in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 141, 872–880 e871-874 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vlug, M.S., et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254, 868–875 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boeckxstaens, G.E., et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 364, 1807–1816 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Broeders, J.A., et al. Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic and conventional nissen fundoplication: randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 250, 698–706 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strong, V.E., et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a casecontrol study. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 1507–1513 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O'Brien, P.E., et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in severely obese adolescents: a randomized trial. JAMA 303, 519–526 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abu Hilal, M., Di Fabio, F., Abu Salameh, M. & Pearce, N.W. Oncological Efficiency Analysis of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Primary and Metastatic Cancer: A Single-Center UK Experience. Arch Surg 147, 42–48 (2012).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gumbs, A.A. & Chouillard, E.K. Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy for Malignant Tumors. J Gastrointest Cancer (2011).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choi, S.H., Hwang, H.K., Kang, C.M., Yoon, C.I. & Lee, W.J. Pylorus- and spleen-preserving total pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of both whole splenic vessels: feasibility and laparoscopic application to intraductal papillary mucinproducing tumors of the pancreas. Surg Endosc (2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Urban & Vogel 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc-H. Dahlke
    • 1
  • Martin Loss
  • Ayman Agha
  • Hans J. Schlitt
  1. 1.Universitätsklinikum RegensburgRegensburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations