Advertisement

Orthopädie & Rheuma

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 39–43 | Cite as

Aktuelle Daten belegen erstmals auch gute Langzeitergebnisse

Schenkelhals-teilerhaltende Kurzschaftprothesen bewähren sich

  • Jörg JeroschEmail author
  • Andreas Breil-Wirth
  • Christian Kothny
  • Christian Grasselli
  • Lars Victor von Engelhardt
Fortbildung
  • 3 Downloads

Kurzschaftprothesen wurden entwickelt, um den Knochen des proximalen Femur weitestgehend zu erhalten. Ziel war es, eine physiologischere Belastung des proximalen Femur sicherzustellen und für etwaige Revisionseingriffe eine bessere Situation zu schaffen. Zudem sollten Kurzschaftsysteme das Stress Shielding des proximalen Femur im Vergleich zu konventionellen zementfreien Systemen reduzieren. Hierdurch versprach man sich eine Minderung von Oberschenkelschmerzen und besonders des Knochenverlusts und damit auch eine Risikoreduktion für aseptische Lockerungen der Hüft-Endoprothesen.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM: Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banerjee S, Pivec R, Issa K, Harwin SF, Mont MA, Khanuja HS: Outcomes of short stems in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2013; 36: 700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W: The Transgluteal Approach to the Hip Joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1979; 95: 47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergschmidt P, Bader R, Finze S, Gankovych A, Kundt G, Mittelmeier W: Cementless total hip replacement: a prospective clinical study of the early functional and radiological outcomes of three different hip stems. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130: 125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breil-Wirth A, von Engelhardt LV, Grasselli C, Jerosch J: 5- to 6-years-results of a cementless short stem hip joint endoprosthesis [Article in German]. Orthopädische und Unfallchirurgische Praxis 2016; 6: 370–375Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr: Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55: 1629–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buttaro M, Nally F, Diaz F et al.: Which prosthetic system restores hip biomechanics more effectively? Poster at the ICJR World Arthroplasty congress, 16. - 18. April 2015, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castellini I, Andreani L, Parchi PD et al.: Hydroxyapatite in total hip arthroplasty. Our experience with a plasma spray porous titanium alloy/hydroxyapatite double-coated cementless stem. Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism. 2016; 13: 221–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray: Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone J Surg Br 1996; 78: 185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dettmer M, Pourmoghaddam A, Kreuzer SW: Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients. Adv Orthop 2015; 817–689Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 257: 107–128Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ercan A, Sokkar SM, Schmid G, Filler TJ, Abdelkafy A, Jerosch J: Periprosthetic bone density changes after MiniHipTM cementless femoral short stem: one-year results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study. SICOT J 2016; 2: 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freitag T, Hein MA, Wernerus D, Reichel H, Bieger R: Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136: 125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hauer G, Vielgut I, Amerstorfer F, MaurerErtl W, Leithner A, Sadoghi P: Survival Rate of Short-Stem Hip Prostheses: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Studies and National Arthroplasty Registers. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 1800–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jerosch J, Funken S: Change of offset after implantation of hip alloarthroplasties [Article in German]. Unfallchirurg 2004; 107: 475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jerosch J, Grasselli C, Kothny PC, Litzkow D, Hennecke T: Reproduction of the anatomy (offset, CCD, leg length) with a modern short stem hip design - a radiological study [Article in German]. Z Orthop Unfall 2012; 150: 20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME: Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006; 126: 164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jerosch J: Kurzschaftprothesen an der Hüfte. 1st ed. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017; 197–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kendoff DO, Citak M, Egidy CC, O’Loughlin PF, Gehrke T: Eleven-year results of the anatomic coated CFP stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 1047–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA: Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 500–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klässbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E: xHip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scand J Rheumatol. 2003; 32: 46–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koyano G, Jinno T, Koga D, Yamauchi Y, Muneta T, Okawa A: Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between an Anatomic Short Stem and a Straight Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 594–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lerch M, von der Haar-Tran A, Windhagen H et al.: Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y: Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 646–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T: Singleincision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441: 115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mihalko WM, Assaf D, Sungu M: Reproducing the hip center with a femoral neck-retaining implant. Orthopedics 2015; 38: 21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M: A conservative femoral replacement for a total hip arthroplasty. A retrospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82: 952–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oinuma K, Eingartner C, Saito Y, Shiratsuchi H. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 310–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robinson RP, Lovell TP, Green TM: Hip arthroplasty using the cementless CLS stem. A 2—4-year experience. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rometsch E, Bos PK, Koes BW: Survival of short hip stems with a „modern“, trochanter-sparing design - a systematic literature review. Hip Int 2012; 22: 344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roth A, Richartz G, Sander K et al.: Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration [Article in German]. Orthopade 2005; 34: 334–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schnurr C, Schellen B, Dargel J, Beckmann J, Eysel P, Steffen R: Low Short-Stem Revision Rates: 1-11 Year Results From 1888 Total Hip Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shafy TA, Sayed A, Abdelazeem AH: Study of the bone behavior around a neck preserving short stem implant: bone densitometric analysis over a span of two years. SICOT J 2016; 2: 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Teoh KH, Lee PY, Woodnutt DJ: Our early experience of the Corin Minihip prosthesis. Hip Int 2016; 26: 265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van Oldenrijk J, Molleman J, Klaver M, Poolman RW, Haverkamp D: Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wedemeyer C, Quitmann H, Xu J, Heep H, von Knoch M, Saxler G: Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128: 1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Windhagen H, Chincisan A, Choi HF, Thorey F: Soft-tissue balance in short and straight stem total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2015; 38: 14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zeh A, Pankow F, Röllinhoff M, Delank S, Wohlrab D: A prospective dual-energy Xray absorptiometry study of bone remodeling after implantation of the Nanos shortstemmed prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg 2013; 79: 174–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhao R, Cai H, Liu Y, Tian H, Zhang K, Liu Z: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Proximal Femoral Fracture During Primary Cementless THA. Orthopedics 2017; 40: 281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Jerosch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreas Breil-Wirth
    • 1
  • Christian Kothny
    • 2
  • Christian Grasselli
    • 3
  • Lars Victor von Engelhardt
    • 4
  1. 1.Klinik für OrthopädieUnfallchirurgie und Sportmedizin am Johanna-Etienne-Krankenhaus NeussNeussDeutschland
  2. 2.München Ortho-CenterMünchenDeutschland
  3. 3.Waldburg-Zeil-Klinik Tettnang, Abteilung für Orthopädie und UnfallchirurgieTettnangDeutschland
  4. 4.St-Antonius-Hospital Kleve, Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfall-, Hand- und WiederherstellungschirurgieUniversität Witten/HerdeckeWitten/HerdeckeDeutschland

Personalised recommendations