Advertisement

Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 19–28 | Cite as

Tissue Regeneration of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Porous Gelatin Micro-Carriers by Long-Term Dynamic In Vitro Culture

  • LeTuyen Nguyen
  • Sumi Bang
  • Insup NohEmail author
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Background:

Tissue engineering is a multidisciplinary field which attracted much attention in recent years. One of the most important issue in tissue engineering is how to obtain high cell numbers and tissue regeneration while maintaining appropriate cellular characteristics in vitro for restoring damaged or dysfunctional body tissues and organs. These demands can be achieved by the use of three dimensional (3D) dynamic cultures of cells combined with cell-adhesive micro-carriers.

Method:

In this study, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were cultured in a wave-bioreactor system for up to 100 days, after seeding on Cultisphere-S porous gelatin micro-carriers. Cell counting was performed at the time points of 7, 12, 17, 31 days and compared to those of hMSCs cultured under static condition. Higher growth and proliferation rates was achieved in wave-type dynamic culture, when cell culture continued to day 31. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs, both live and dead and MTT assays were taken to confirm the survival and distribution of cells on porous gelatin micro-carrier surfaces. The results of histological stains such as hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome, Alcian blue and Alizarin red S also showed improved proliferation and tissue regeneration of hMSCs on porous gelatin micro-carriers.

Conclusion:

The experimental results demonstrated the effect and importance of both micro-carriers and bioreactor in hMSC expansion on cell proliferation and migration as well as extracellular matrix formation on the superficial and pore surfaces of the porous gelatin micro-carriers, and then their inter-connections, leading to tissue regeneration.

Keywords

Dynamic culture Waving type bioreactor Mesenchymal stem cells Gelatin micro-carrier 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant (2015R1A2A1A10054592). Human mesenchymal stem cells has been donated by Professor Sungwon Kim in the Catholic University of Korea St Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

There are no animal experiments carried out in this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Polo-Corrales L, Latorre-Esteves M, Ramirez-Vick JE. Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;14:15–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berthiaume F, Maguire TJ, Yarmush ML. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: history, progress, and challenges. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011;2:403–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun LY, Hsieh DK, Syu WS, Li YS, Chiu HT, Chiou TW. Cell proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on biodegradable microcarriers enhances in vitro differentiation potential. Cell Prolif. 2010;43:445–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun LY, Lin SZ, Li YS, Harn HJ, Chiou TW. Functional cells cultured on microcarriers for use in regenerative medicine research. Cell Transplant. 2011;20:49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Wezel AL. Growth of cell-strains and primary cells on micro-carriers in homogeneous culture. Nature. 1967;216:64–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nilsson K. Microcarrier cell culture. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1988;6:403–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nie Y, Bergendahl V, Hei DJ, Jones JM, Palecek SP. Scalable culture and cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells on microcarriers. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25:20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frauenschuh S, Reichmann E, Ibold Y, Goetz PM, Sittinger M, Ringe J. Microcarrier-based cultivation system for expansion of primary mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol Prog. 2007;23:187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh H, Mok P, Balakrishnan T, Rahmat SN, Zweigerdt R. Up-scaling single cell-inoculated suspension culture of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2010;4:165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain E, Kumar A. Upstream processes in antibody production: evaluation of critical parameters. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26:46–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallo-Ramírez LE, Nikolay A, Genzel Y, Reichl U. Bioreactor concepts for cell culture-based viral vaccine production. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015;14:1181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu JY, Hafner J, Dragieva G, Burg G. Bioreactor microcarrier cell culture system (Bio-MCCS) for large-scale production of autologous melanocytes. Cell Transplant. 2004;13:809–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abeille F, Mittler F, Obeid P, Huet M, Kermarrec F, Dolega ME, et al. Continuous microcarrier-based cell culture in a benchtop microfluidic bioreactor. Lab Chip. 2014;14:3510–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu CY, Stoecklein D, Kommajosula A, Lin J, Owsley K, Ganapathysubramanian B, et al. Shaped 3D microcarriers for adherent cell culture and alaysis. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2018;4:21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merten OW. Advances in cell culture: anchorage dependence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mrakovcic M, Absenger M, Riedl R, Smole C, Roblegg E, Fröhlich LF, et al. Assessment of long-term effects of nanoparticles in a microcarrier cell culture system. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu JY, Hafner J, Dragieva G, Burg G. A novel bioreactor microcarrier cell culture system for high yields of proliferating autologous human keratinocytes. Cell Transplant. 2006;15:435–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang Y, Wang X, Pong M, Chen L, Ye Z. Application of bioreactor in stem cell culture. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2017;10:485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rafiq QA, Coopman K, Nienow AW, Hewitt CJ. Systematic microcarrier screening and agitated culture conditions improves human mesenchymal stem cell yield in bioreactors. Biotechnol J. 2016;11:473–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lam AT, Chen AK, Li J, Birch WR, Reuveny S, Oh SK. Conjoint propagation and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes in a defined microcarrier spinner culture. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park Y, Chen Y, Ordovas L, Verfaillie CM. Hepatic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on microcarriers. J Biotechnol. 2014;174:39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shekaran A, Sim E, Tan KY, Chan JK, Choolani M, Reuveny S, et al. Enhanced in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human fetal MSCs attached to 3D microcarriers versus harvested from 2D monolayers. BMC Biotechnol. 2015;15:102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin YM, Lim JF, Lee J, Choolani M, Chan JK, Reuveny S, et al. Expansion in microcarrier-spinner cultures improves the chondrogenic potential of human early mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:740–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morille M, Toupet K, Montero-Menei CN, Jorgensen C, Noël D. PLGA-based Microcarriers induce mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis and stimulate cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. Biomaterials. 2016;88:60–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kakkar A, Sorout A, Tiwari M, Shrivastava P, Meena P, Saraswat SK, et al. Current status of stem cell treatment for type I diabetes mellitus. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15:699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oliva J, Ochiai K, Florentino A, Bardag-Gorce F, Wood A, Niihara Y. Feeder cells free rabbit oral mucosa epithelial cell sheet engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15:321–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iyer K, Chen Z, Ganapa T, Wu BM, Tawil B, Linsley CS. Keratinocyte migration in a three-dimensional in vitro wound healing model co-cultured with fibroblasts. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15:721–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung CS, Kim BK, Lee J, Min BH, Park SH. Development of printable natural cartilage matrix bioink for 3D printing of irregular tissue shape. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15:155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Das D, Pham TTH, Lee S, Noh I. Fabrication of alginate-based stimuli-responsive, non-cytotoxic, terpolymric semi-IPN hydrogel as a carrier for controlled release of bovine albumin serum and 5-amino salicylic acid. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;98:42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Das D, Pham TTH, Noh I. Characterizations of hyaluronate-based terpolymeric hydrogel synthesized via free radical polymerization mechanism for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;170:64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Janarthanan G, Noh I. Click chemistry-based injectable hydrogels and bioprinting inks for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15:531–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Das D, Cho H, Kim N, Pham TTH, Kim IG, Chung EJ, et al. A terpolymeric hydrogel of hyaluronate-hydroxyethyl acrylate-gelatin methacryloyl with tunable properties as biomaterial. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;207:628–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringSeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Convergence Institute of Biomedical Engineering and BiomaterialsSeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations