Advertisement

Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 498–506 | Cite as

Comparative study of poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds coated with chitosan nanoparticles prepared via ultrasonication and ionic gelation techniques

  • Majid Salehi
  • Mahdi Naseri-Nosar
  • Mahmoud Azami
  • Saeedeh Jafari Nodooshan
  • Javad Arish
Original Article Tissue Engineering

Abstract

In this study, an attempt was made to develop bi-functional constructs serving both as scaffolds and potential delivery systems for application in neural tissue engineering. The constructs were prepared in two steps. In the first step, the bulks of poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) in 1, 4-dioxane/water (87:13) were fabricated using liquid-liquid thermally induced phase separation technique. In the next step, the prepared bulks were coated with chitosan nanoparticles produced by two different techniques of ultrasonication and ionic gelation by grafting-coating technique. In ultrasonication technique, the chitosan solution (2 mg/mL) in acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer (90:10) was irradiated by an ultrasound generator at 20 kHz and power output of 750 W for 100 s. In ionic gelation technique, the tripolyphosphate in water solution (1 mg/mL) was added to the same chitosan solution. The physicochemical properties of the products were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform-Infrared, liquid displacement technique, contact angle measurement, compressive and tensile tests, as well as zeta potential and particle size analysis using dynamic light scattering. Moreover, the cell proliferation and attachment on the scaffolds were evaluated through human glioblastoma cell line (U-87 MG) and human neuroblastoma cell line [BE (2)-C] culture respectively. The results showed that the samples coated with chitosan nanoparticles prepared by ultrasonication possessed enhanced hydrophilicity, biodegradation and cytocompatibility compared with pure PLLA and PLLA coated with chitosan nanoparticles prepared by ionic gelation. This study suggests successful nanoparticles-scaffold systems which can act simultaneously as potential delivery systems and tissue engineering scaffolds.

Key Words

Neural tissue engineering Poly(L-Lactic acid) Thermally induced phase separation Chitosan nanoparticles Ultrasonication Ionic gelation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schmidt CE, Leach JB. Neural tissue engineering:strategies for repair and regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2003;5:293–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kessler MW, Grande DA. Tissue engineering and cartilage. Organogenesis 2008;4:28–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duarte ARC, Mano JF, Reis RL, Preparation of starch-based scaffolds for tissue engineering by supercritical immersion precipitation. J Supercrit Fluids 2009;49:279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu N, Li MG, Cooper D, Chen XB. Development of novel hybrid poly(L-lactide)/chitosan scaffolds using the rapid freeze prototyping technique. Biofabrication 2011;3:034105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tessmar JK, Göpferich AM. Matrices and scaffolds for protein delivery in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:274–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blasi P, Giovagnoli S, Schoubben A, Ricci M, Rossi C. Solid lipid nanoparticles for targeted brain drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:454–477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2010;75:1–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu Z, Jiao Y, Wang Y, Zhou C, Zhang Z. Polysaccharides-based nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60:1650–1662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hejazi R, Amiji M. Chitosan-based gastrointestinal delivery systems. J Control Release 2003;89:151–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muzzarelli RAA. Chitins and chitosans for the repair of wounded skin, nerve, cartilage and bone. Carbohydrate Polym 2009;76:167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi C, Zhu Y, Ran X, Wang M, Su Y, Cheng T. Therapeutic potential of chitosan and its derivatives in regenerative medicine. J Surg Res 2006;133:185–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freier T, Koh HS, Kazazian K, Shoichet MS. Controlling cell adhesion and degradation of chitosan films by N-acetylation. Biomaterials 2005;26:5872–5878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang ES, Huang M, Lim LY. Ultrasonication of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2003;265:103–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel JK, Jivani NP. Chitosan based nanoparticles in drug delivery. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechnol 2009;2:517–522.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suslick KS, Price GJ. Applications of ultrasound to materials chemistry. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1999;29:295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen RH, Chang JR, Shyur JS. Effects of ultrasonic conditions and storage in acidic solutions on changes in molecular weight and polydispersity of treated chitosan. Carbohydrate Res 1997;299:287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gan Q, Wang T. Chitosan nanoparticle as protein delivery carrier—systematic examination of fabrication conditions for efficient loading and release. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2007;59:24–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gan Q, Wang T, Cochrane C, McCarron P. Modulation of surface charge, particle size and morphological properties of chitosan-TPP nanoparticles intended for gene delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005;44:65–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ko JA, Park HJ, Hwang SJ, Park JB, Lee JS. Preparation and characterization of chitosan microparticles intended for controlled drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2002;249:165–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mi FL, Shyu SS, Chen CT, Lai JY. Adsorption of indomethacin onto chemically modified chitosan beads. Polymer 2002;43:757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hua FJ, Kim GE, Lee JD, Son YK, Lee DS. Macroporous poly(L-lactide) scaffold 1. Preparation of a macroporous scaffold by liquid—liquid phase separation of a PLLA—dioxane—water system. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:161–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ho ST, Hutmacher DW. A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006;27:1362–1376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salehi M, Nosar MN, Amani A, Azami M, Tavakol S, Ghanbari H. Preparation of pure PLLA, pure chitosan, and PLLA/chitosan blend porous tissue engineering scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation method and evaluation of the corresponding mechanical and biological properties. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 2015;64:675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lao L, Tan H, Wang Y, Gao C. Chitosan modified poly(L-lactide) microspheres as cell microcarriers for cartilage tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2008;66:218–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hong Y, Gao C, Xie Y, Gong Y, Shen J. Collagen-coated polylactide microspheres as chondrocyte microcarriers. Biomaterials 2005;26:6305–6313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liao YZ, Xin MH, Li MC, Su S. Preparation and characterization O-lauroyl chitosan/poly(l-lactic acid) blend membranes by solution-casting approach. Chin Chem Lett 2007;18:213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen C, Dong L, Cheung MK. Preparation and characterization of biodegradable poly(l-lactide)/chitosan blends. Eur Polym J 2005;41:958–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moffa M, Polini A, Sciancalepore AG, Persano L, Mele E, Passione LG, et al. Microvascular endothelial cell spreading and proliferation on nanofibrous scaffolds by polymer blends with enhanced wettability. Soft Matter 2013;9:5529–5539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peniche C, Argüelles-Monal W, Davidenko N, Sastre R, Gallardo A, San Román J. Self-curing membranes of chitosan/PAA IPNs obtained by radical polymerization:preparation, characterization and interpolymer complexation. Biomaterials 1999;20:1869–1878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu Y, Du Y. Effect of molecular structure of chitosan on protein delivery properties of chitosan nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2003;250:215–226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu Y, Yang W, Wang C, Hu J, Fu S. Chitosan nanoparticles as a novel delivery system for ammonium glycyrrhizinate. Int J Pharm 2005;295:235–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang F, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S, Wang X, Ma YX, Wang S. Fabrication of nano-structured porous PLLA scaffold intended for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004;25:1891–1900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhu X, Cui W, Li X, Jin Y. Electrospun fibrous mats with high porosity as potential scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2008;9:1795–1801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thanou M, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE. Oral drug absorption enhancement by chitosan and its derivatives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;52:117–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pukanszk B, Maurer FHJ, Boode JW. Impact testing of polypropylene blends and comosites. Polym Eng Sci 1995;35:1962–1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Correlo VM, Boesel LF, Bhattacharya M, Mano JF, Neves NM, Reis RL. Properties of melt processed chitosan and aliphatic polyester blends. Mater Sci Eng A 2005;403:57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jiao Y, Liu Z, Zhou C. Fabrication and characterization of PLLA-chitosan hybrid scaffolds with improved cell compatibility. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80:820–825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li Z, Ramay HR, Hauch KD, Xiao D, Zhang M. Chitosan-alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005;26:3919–3928.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang Y, Zhang M. Synthesis and characterization of macroporous chitosan/calcium phosphate composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:304–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ma PX, Choi JW. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds with well-defined interconnected spherical pore network. Tissue Eng 2001;7:23–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Peña J, Corrales T, Izquierdo-Barba I, Doadrio AL, Vallet-Regí M. Long term degradation of poly (e-caprolactone) films in biologically related fluids. Polym Degrad Stab 2006;91:1424–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Li RK, Weisel RD. Cardiac regeneration and repair. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing;2014.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nasti A, Zaki NM, de Leonardis P, Ungphaiboon S, Sansongsak P, Rimoli MG, et al. Chitosan/TPP and chitosan/TPP-hyaluronic acid nanoparticles:systematic optimisation of the preparative process and preliminary biological evaluation. Pharm Res 2009;26:1918–1930.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mi FL, Shyu SS, Lee ST, Wong TB. Kinetic study of chitosan-tripolyphosphate complex reaction and acid-resistive properties of the chitosan-tripolyphosphate gel beads prepared by in-liquid curing method. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 1999;37:1551–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 2000;21:2335–2346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lu L, Peter SJ, Lyman MD, Lai HL, Leite SM, Tamada JA, et al. In vitro degradation of porous poly(L-lactic acid) foams. Biomaterials 2000;21:1595–1605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    López-León T, Carvalho EL, Seijo B, Ortega-Vinuesa JL, Bastos-González D. Physicochemical characterization of chitosan nanoparticles:electrokinetic and stability behavior. J Colloid Interface Sci 2005;283:344–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chen S, Hao Y, Cui W. Biodegradable electrospun PLLA/chitosan membrane as guided tissue regeneration membrane for treating periodontitis. J Mater Sci 2013;48:6567–6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lee JH, Park TG, Park HS, Lee DS, Lee YK, Yoon SC, et al. Thermal and mechanical characteristics of poly(l-lactic acid) nanocomposite scaffold. Biomaterials 2003;24:2773–2778.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wan Y, Wu H, Cao X, Dalai S. Compressive mechanical properties and biodegradability of porous poly (caprolactone)/chitosan scaffolds. Polym Degrad Stab 2008;93:1736–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang X, Song G, Lou T, Peng W. Fabrication of nano-fibrous PLLA scaffold reinforced with chitosan fibers. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:1995–2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Majid Salehi
    • 1
  • Mahdi Naseri-Nosar
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Azami
    • 1
  • Saeedeh Jafari Nodooshan
    • 2
  • Javad Arish
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Nanotechnology, School of New Sciences and TechnologyPharmaceutical Sciences Branch of Islamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations