Advertisement

Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 476–482 | Cite as

Comparison of different concentrations of tetracycline-loaded silk fibroin membranes on the guided bone regeneration in the rat calvarial defect model

  • Hyun Seok
  • Seong-Gon KimEmail author
  • HaeYong Kweon
  • You-Young Jo
  • Kwang-Gill Lee
  • Tae Yeon Kang
  • Weon-Sik Chae
  • Soo-Kee Min
  • Jang-Hoon Ahn
  • Jun-Woo Park
  • Dong-Ju Choi
Original Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration ability using different concentrations of tetracycline (TC) loaded into silk fibroin membranes (SFMs). Prior to animal experiments, MTT assays and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays were performed to evaluate the cellular response of each membrane. Critical sized bone defects (8-mm diameter) on rat calvaria were prepared and covered with SFM containing different concentrations of TC:1% TC (TC1), 5% TC (TC5), 10% TC (TC10), and 0% TC (SFM only). The bone regeneration was evaluated by micro-computerized tomography (μ-CT) and histomorphometric analysis at 4 weeks postoperatively. ALP activity was increased in a dose-dependent manner as the applied TC concentrations. By μ-CT analysis, newly formed bone volume in the TC5 group was significantly higher than that in the SFM only group (P<0.001), the TC1 group (P=0.004), and the TC10 group (P=0.012). From histomorphometric analysis, new bone formation was greater in the TC5 group than in the SFM only group (P=0.003) and the TC1 group (P=0.010). There was no significant difference between the TC5 and TC10 group (P>0.05). In conclusion, TC-loaded SFM showed more bone formation than SFM without TC, and the amount of new bone formation was dependent on TC concentrations.

Key words

Guided bone regeneration tetracycline silk fibroin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M Clementini, A Morlupi, L Canullo, et al., Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: a systematic review, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 41, 847 (2012).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    RE Jung, N Fenner, CH Hämmerle, et al., Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12–14 years, Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, 1065 (2013).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C Dahlin, A Linde, J Gottlow, et al., Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration, Plast Reconstr Surg, 81, 672 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    BS McAllister, K Haghighat, Bone augmentation techniques, J Periodontol, 78, 377 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M Lorenzoni, C Pertl, RA Polansky, et al., Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes, Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, 274 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    SA Jovanovic, RK Schenk, M Orsini, et al., Supracrestal bone formation around dental implants: an experimental dog study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, 23 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NU Zitzmann, R Naef, P Schärer, Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, 844 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H Nowzari, J Slots, Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, 67 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    KM Chung, LM Salkin, MD Stein, et al., Clinical evaluation of a biodegradable collagen membrane in guided tissue regeneration, J Periodontol, 61, 732 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    SH Park, Kw Lee, TJ Oh, et al., Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation, Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, 32 (2008).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A Kozlovsky, G Aboodi, O Moses, et al., Bio-degradation of a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®) applied in a double-layer technique in rats, Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, 1116 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    TJ Oh, SJ Meraw, EJ Lee, et al., Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects, Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, 80 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y Cao, B Wang, Biodegradation of silk biomaterials, Int J Mol Sci, 10, 1514 (2009).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J Pérez-Rigueiro, M Elices, J Llorca, et al., Tensile properties of silkworm silk obtained by forced silking, J Appl Polym Sci, 82, 1928 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    GH Altman, F Diaz, C Jakuba, et al., Silk-based biomaterials, Biomaterials, 24, 401 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M Santin, A Motta, G Freddi, et al., In vitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin, J Biomed Mater Res, 46, 382 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C Li, C Vepari, HJ Jin, et al., Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 27, 3115 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H Kweon, JH Yeo, KG Lee, et al., Semi-interpenetrating polymer networks composed of silk fibroin and poly (ethylene glycol) for wound dressing, Biomed Mater, 3, 034115 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J Kim, CH Kim, CH Park, et al., Comparison of methods for the repair of acute tympanic membrane perforations: silk patch vs. paper patch, Wound Repair Regen, 18, 132 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    SW Lee, SG Kim, JY Song, et al., Silk Fibroin and 4- Hexylresorcinol Incorporation Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration, J Craniofac Surg, 24, 1927 (2013).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    JY Song, SG Kim, JW Lee, et al., Accelerated healing with the use of a silk fibroin membrane for the guided bone regeneration technique, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 112, e26 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N Minoura, S Aiba, M Higuchi, et al., Attachment and growth of fibroblast cells on silk fibroin, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 208, 511 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    MJ Mycek, RA Harvey, R Champe, Lippincott’s illustrated reviews pharmacology, Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, (1997).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    AR Sánchez, RS Rogers, PJ Sheridan, Tetracycline and other tetracycline-derivative staining of the teeth and oral cavity, Int J Dermatol, 43, 709 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K Kornman, M Newman, D Moore, et al., The influence of supragingival plaque control on clinical and microbial outcomes following the use of antibiotics for the treatment of periodontitis, J Periodontol, 65, 848 (1994).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A Dhem, N Piret, D Fortunati, Tetracyclines, doxycycline and calcified tissues, Scand J Infect Dis Suppl, 42 (1975).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    AE Cale, PD Freedman, H Lumerman, Pigmentation of the jawbones and teeth secondary to minocycline hydrochloride therapy, J Periodontol, 59, 112 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    E Eisenberg, Anomalies of the teeth with stains and discolorations, J Prev Dent, 2, 7 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    N Sadaf, B Anoop, B Dakshina, et al., Evaluation of efficacy of tetracycline fibers in conjunction with scaling and root planing in patients with chronic periodontitis, J Indian Soc Periodontol, 16, 392 (2012).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R Tavakoli-darestani, A Manafi-rasi, A Kamrani-rad, Dexamethasone-loaded hydroxyapatite enhances bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects, Mol Biol Rep, 41, 423 (2014).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    N Donos, L Kostopoulos, T Karring, Alveolar ridge augmentation by combining autogenous mandibular bone grafts and non-resorbable membranes, Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, 185 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    SW Lee, YT Park, SG Kim, et al., The Effects of Tetracyclineloaded Silk Fibroin Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration in a Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model, J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 34, 293 (2012).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A Mombelli, A Feloutzis, U Brägger, et al., Treatment of periimplantitis by local delivery of tetracycline, Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, 287 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    L Golub, N Ramamurthy, T McNamara, et al., Tetracyclines inhibit tissue collagenase activity, J Periodontal Res, 19, 651 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S Bain, N Ramamurthy, T Impeduglia, et al., Tetracycline prevents cancellous bone loss and maintains near-normal rates of bone formation in streptozotocin diabetic rats, Bone, 21, 147 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    T Sasaki, NS Ramamurthy, LM Golub, Tetracycline administration increases collagen synthesis in osteoblasts of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: a quantitative autoradiographic study, Calcif Tissue Int, 50, 411 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    LM Golub, TF McNamara, ME Ryan, et al., Adjunctive treatment with subantimicrobial doses of doxycycline: effects on gingival fluid collagenase activity and attachment loss in adult periodontitis, J Clin Periodontol, 28, 146 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A Yaffe, A Herman, H Bahar, et al., Combined local application of tetracycline and bisphosphonate reduces alveolar bone resorption in rats, J Periodontol, 74, 1038 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyun Seok
    • 1
  • Seong-Gon Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • HaeYong Kweon
    • 2
  • You-Young Jo
    • 2
  • Kwang-Gill Lee
    • 2
  • Tae Yeon Kang
    • 3
  • Weon-Sik Chae
    • 3
  • Soo-Kee Min
    • 4
  • Jang-Hoon Ahn
    • 5
  • Jun-Woo Park
    • 5
  • Dong-Ju Choi
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of DentistryGangneung-Wonju National UniversityGangneungKorea
  2. 2.Sericultural and Apicultural Materials DivisionNational Academy of Agricultural ScienceSuwonKorea
  3. 3.Gangneung CenterKorea Basic Science InstituteGangneungKorea
  4. 4.Department of Pathology, College of MedicineHallym UniversityChuncheonKorea
  5. 5.Department of Dentistry, College of MedicineHallym UniversityChuncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations