Advertisement

Applied Biological Chemistry

, Volume 59, Issue 5, pp 695–701 | Cite as

Competitive adsorption of thallium in different soils as influenced by selected counter heavy metals

  • Dong-Jin Kim
  • Hye-Jin Shin
  • Byung-Koo Ahn
  • Jin-Ho LeeEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate thallium (Tl) adsorption in different soils, including acidic Jeonju (JJ), neutral Iksan (IS), and alkaline Danyang (DY) soils treated with various single counter metal ions and to examine the competitive adsorption of Tl with other metals, including cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn), in multicomponent systems. Thallium buffering capacity of the soils was ordered as IS > DY > JJ soil in the single-component systems, whereas it was DY > IS > JJ soil in the multicomponent systems. In the competitive systems of Tl with different single counter metals, the Tl adsorption capacity of the soils ranged from 20.33 to 88.38 and Tl bonding energy values ranged from 0.369 to 0.731. Thallium adsorption capacity and bonding energy were negatively correlated. Selectivity sequences of metals in multicomponent systems were Pb > Tl > Cu > Ni > Zn > Cd in the JJ soil, Pb > Cu > Tl > Zn > Cd > Ni in the IS soil, and Pb > Cu > Tl ≥ Zn > Cd > Ni in the DY soil. The metal buffering capacity in the JJ, IS, and DY soils varied from 293.2 to 1125.2. The values were ordered as Tl ≫ Pb ≥ Zn ≥ Ni > Cu ≥ Cd in the JJ soil, Pb > Cu > Tl ≫ Ni > Zn ≥ Cd in the IS soil, and Pb > Cu ≫ Tl > Ni > Cd ≥ Zn in the DY soil.

Keywords

Competitive adsorption Counter ions Heavy metal Selectivity sequence Thallium 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2010-0006512).

References

  1. Anderson DC (1988) Trace elements in the terrestrial environment. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheam V (2001) Thallium contamination of water in Canada. Water Qual Res J Can 36(4):851–877Google Scholar
  3. Chung DY, Noh HH (2005) Competitive adsorption of multi-species of heavy metals onto sandy clay loam and clay soils. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 38(5):238–246Google Scholar
  4. Covelo EF, Andrade ML, Vega FA (2004) Heavy metal adsorption by humic umbrisols: selectivity sequences and competitive sorption kinetics. J Colloid Interface Sci 280:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Covelo EF, Andrade ML, Vega FA (2007) Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals by individual soil components. J Hazard Mater 140:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dang YP, Dalal RC, Edwards DG, Tiller KG (1994) Zinc buffer capacity of vertisols. Aust J Soil Res 32:1231–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diatta J, Kociałkowski W (1998) Adsorption of zinc in some selected soils. Pol J Environ Stud 7(4):195–200Google Scholar
  8. Echeverria JC, Morera MT, Mazkiaran C, Garrido JJ (1998) Competitive sorption of heavy metal by soils. Isotherms and fractional factorial experiments. Environ Poll 101:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Febrianto J, Kosasih AN, Sunarso J, Ju YH, Indraswati N, Ismadji S (2009) Equilibrium and kinetic studies in adsorption of heavy metals using biosorbent: a summary of recent studies. J Hazard Mater 162:616–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fontes MPF (2013) Behavior of heavy metals in soils: individual and multiple competitive adsorption. In: Selim HM (ed) Competitive sorption and transport of heavy metals in soils and geological media. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 77–118Google Scholar
  11. Grasso D, Butkus MA, O’sullivan D, Nikolaidis NP (1997) Soil-washing design methodology for a lead-contaminated sandy-soil. Wat Res 31(12):3045–3056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray CW, McLrren RG (2006) Soil factors affecting heavy metal solubility in some New Zealand soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 175(1–4):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heike BB (2004) Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. J Colloid Interface Sci 277(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO 11466 (1995) Soil quality-extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. Jalali M, Moradi F (2013) Competitive sorption of Cd, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in polluted and unpolluted calcareous soils. Environ Monit Assess 185:8831–8846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kazantzis G (2000) Thallium in the environment and health effects. Environ Geochem Health 22:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim DJ (2010) Evaluation of chemical extractants for optimal thallium (Tl) extraction and Tl sorption relationships in soils. Chonbuk National University, JeonJuGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamurti GSR, Naidu R (2003) Solid-solution equilibria of cadmium in soils. Geoderma 113:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee JH, Ahn BK (2010) Comparisons of various chemical extracts as quantity factors to determine metal-buffering capacity of soils. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1463–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee JH, Doolittle JJ (2002) Phosphate application impacts on cadmium sorption in acidic and calcareous soils. Soil Sci 167(6):390–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee JJ, Park BY, Choi J (1988) Effects of ionic strength and anion species on heavy metal adsorption by zeolite. Korean J Environ Agric 7:96–101Google Scholar
  22. Lee JH, Kim DJ, Ahn BK (2015) Distributions and concentrations of thallium in Korean soils determined by single and sequential extraction procedures. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94:756–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loeppert RH, Inskeep WP (1996) Iron. In: Spark DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. chemical methods. Soil Sci Soc Am and Am Soc Agron, Madison, pp 639–664Google Scholar
  24. Malo DD, Doolittle JJ (2000) Soil particle size analysis methods. Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, BrookingsGoogle Scholar
  25. Merrikhpour H, Jalali M (2013) Comparative and competitive adsorption of cadmium, copper, nickel, and lead ions by Iranian natural zeolite. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mesquita ME, Carranca C (2005) Effect of dissolved organic matter on copper zinc competitive adsorption by a sandy soil at different pH values. Environ Technol 26(9):1065–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moreira CS, Alleoni LRF (2010) Adsorption of Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn in tropical soils under competitive and non-competitive systems(Piracicaba, Braz.). Sci Agric 67(3):301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moreno AM, Quintana JR, Perez L, Parra JG (2006) Factors influencing lead sorption-desorption at variable added metal concentrations in Rhodoxeralfs. Chemosphere 64(5):758–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NAAS (2010) Methods of soil chemical analysis. National Academy of Agricultural Science, Republic of KoreaGoogle Scholar
  30. Qi W, Chen Y, Cao J (1992) Indium and thallium background contents in soils in China. Int J Environ Study 40:311–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saha UK, Taniguchi S, Sakurai K (2002) Simultaneous adsorption of cadmium, zinc, and lead on hydroxyalumium- and hydroxyaluminosilicate-montmorillonite complexes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sherene T (2010) Mobility and transport of heavy metals in polluted soil environment. Biol Forum Int J 2(2):112–121Google Scholar
  33. Sprynskyy M, Kowalkowski T, Tutu H, Cozmuta LM, Cukrowska EM, Buszewski B (2011) The adsorption properties of agricultural and forest soils towards heavy metal ions (Ni, Cu, Zn, and Cu). Soil Sediment Contam 20:12–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Srivastava P, Singh B, Angove M (2005) Competitive adsorption behavior of heavy metals on kaolinite. J Colloid Interface Sci 290(1):28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tremel A, Masson P, Sterckeman T, Baize D, Mench M (1997) Thallium in French agrosystems I.—Thallium contents in arable soils. Environ Poll 95:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vanek A, Chrastny V, Mihaljevic M, Drahota P, Grygar T, Komarek M (2009) Lithogenic thallium behavior in soils with different land use. J Geochem Expl 102:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2006) Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals in mine soils: influence of mine soil characteristics. J Colloid Interface Sci 298:582–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wei YL, Huang YL (1998) Behaviour of sequential extraction of lead from thermally treated lead (II)—doped alumina. J Environ Qual 27:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xiang X, Stagnitti F, Turoczy N, Allinson G, Li P, Nieber J, Steenhuis TS, Parlang JY, LeBlanc M, Ziogas AK, Ferreira AJD, Keizer JJ (2005) Competitive sorption of metals in water repellent soils: implications for irrigation recycled water. Australian J Soil Res 43:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang MK, Zhang SA (2007) Competitive adosprion of Cd, Cu, Hg and Pb by agricultural soils of the Changjiang and Zhujiang deltas in China. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 8(11):1808–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhou D, Liu D (1985) Chronic thallium poisoning in a rural area of Guizhou province, China. J Environ Health 48:14–18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioenvironmental ChemistryChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension ServicesIksanRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Institute of Agricultural Science and TechnologyChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations