Advertisement

The effect of tropical peat land-use changes on plant diversity and soil properties

  • C. AgusEmail author
  • Z. R. Ilfana
  • F. F. Azmi
  • D. Rachmanadi
  • Widiyatno
  • D. Wulandari
  • P. B. Santosa
  • M. K. Harun
  • T. W. Yuwati
  • T. Lestari
Original Paper

Abstract

Alterations in land use of a million hectares of peatlands in Central Kalimantan and other regions, without an understanding of the characteristics of tropical peatlands, have led to land degradation. This study aimed to determine the effect of land-use changes on plant diversity and soil characteristics of peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The conversion of secondary forests to critically degraded land, acacia forest, agroforestry land, rubber gardens, and palm oil plantations by clear-cutting and fire converted organic materials to available nutrients and increased soil pH at the soil surface. However, the nutrients are easily leached by high rainfall intensity thus resulted in a more degraded land at long-term periods. Land-use change resulted in high humic acid levels, aromatic area, hydrophobic surface area, but low water storage capability. This condition made it easily burn during the dry season and is prone to flooding during the rainy season. The Shannon indexes for all tropical peatland land uses at all levels of plant growth categorized plant diversity and number of individuals as low to moderate due to waterlogging, low pH, low soil fertility, high metal toxicity, and fire. Land with oil-, sap- and litter-producing plants, which resist decomposition, and monoculture plantations tended to contain higher amounts of humic acid, hydrophilic areas, aromatic areas, and bulk density than naturally regenerated forests, although these land uses had lower organic C, available N, and water-holding capacity. Closed cycles of organic matter, carbon, water, nutrient, energy, production, and crops should be maintained for rehabilitation of peatland.

Keywords

Carbon Forest fire Land degradation Productivity Tropical ecosystem 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology RI, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Indonesia, and USAID through the SHERA program—Centre for Development of Sustainable Region (CDSR). In the year 2017–2021 CDSR is led by Center of Energy Studies UGM.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agus C (2018) Development of blue revolution through integrated bio-cycles system on tropical natural resources management. In: Leal Filho W, Pociovălișteanu D, Borges de Brito P, Borges de Lima I (eds) World sustainability series: towards a sustainable bioeconomy: principles, challenges and perspectives. Springer, Cham, pp 155–172Google Scholar
  2. Agus C, Karyanto O, Kita S, Haibara K, Toda H, Hardiwinoto S, Supriyo H, Naiem M, Wardana W, Sipayung M, Khomsatun Wijoyo S (2004) Sustainable site productivity and nutrient management in a short rotation Gmelina arborea plantation in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. New For J 28:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agus C, Putra PB, Faridah E, Wulandari D, Napitupulu RNP (2016) Organic carbon stock and their dynamics in rehabilitation ecosystem areas of post open coal mining at tropical region. Procedia Eng 159:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agus C, Wulandari D, Primananda E, Hendryan A, Harianja V (2017) The role of soil amendment on tropical post tin mining area in Bangka Island Indonesia for dignified and sustainable environment and life. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 83:012030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agus C, Azmi FF, Ilfana ZR, Widiyatno Wulandari D, Harun MK, Yuwati TW (2018) The impact of forest fire on their biodiversity and soil characteristic on tropical peat-land. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Climate change management book series: handbook of climate change and biodiversity. Springer, Zug, pp 287–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98681-4_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agus CE, Primananda E, Faridah D Wulandari, Lestari T (2019) Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pongamia pinnata for revegetation of tropical open-pit coal mining soils. Int J Environ Sci Technol (IJEST) 15(11):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1983-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andriesse JP (1988) Nature and management of tropical peat soils. FAO Soils Bulletin 59. FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Ania CO, Cabal B, Parra JB, Pis JJ (2006) Importance of the hydrophobic character of activated carbons on the removal of naphthalene from the aqueous phase. In: The XXXIst Iberic Adsorption Meeting, Tarragona, Spain, September 27–29, 2006. Instituto Nacional del Carbón, CSIC, Apartado 73, 33080. Oviedo, SpainGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakker JP, Poschlod P, Strykstra RJ, Bekker RM, Thompson K (1996) Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Bot Neerl J 45(4):461–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BSN -Badan Standardisasi Nasional (2011) Ground Based Forest Carbon Accounting. SNI No. 7724:2011. Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), Jakarta, p 16Google Scholar
  11. Cahyanti PAB, Agus C (2017) Development of landscape architecture through geo-eco-tourism in tropical karst area to avoid extractive cement industry for dignified and sustainable environment and life. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 83:012028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dohong A, Aziz AA, Dargusch P (2017) A review of the drivers of tropical peatland degradation in South-East Asia. Land Use Policy 69(December 2017):349–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Euroconsult (1984) Nationwide study of coastal and near coastal swamp-land in Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Irian Jaya. Vol. I and II, ArnhemGoogle Scholar
  14. Giesen W, Nirmala E (2018) Tropical Peatland restoration report: the Indonesian case. Technical report. Project: (MCA-Indonesia funded) Berbak Green Prosperity Program in Jambi.  https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.30049.40808
  15. Ginoga K, Cacho O, Erwidodo, Lugina M, Djaenudin D (2002) Economic performance of common agroforestry systems in Southern Sumatera: implications for carbon sequestration services. Working paper CC03. ACIAR ProjectGoogle Scholar
  16. Harun MK (2014) Agroforestry berbasis Jelutung Rawa. Solusi Sosial, Ekonomi dan Lingkungan Pengelolaan Lahan Gambut. FORDA Press, Bogor, 254 hal. (in Indonesian)Google Scholar
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2003) Revision of the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC Expert Group Scoping Meeting Report, Geneva, SwistzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Kita S, Agus C, Toda H, Haibara K (2008) Effect of short-rotation harvesting on soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralization in Gmelina arborea plantations in East Kalimantan. TROPICS 17(3):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kolka R, Murdiyarso D, Kauffman JB, Birdsey RA (2016) Tropical wetlands, climate, and land-use change: adaptation and mitigation opportunities. Wetlands Ecol Manag 24(2):107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Limin SH, Jaya MJ, Dohong A, Jagau Y (2003) Pokok-pokok pikiran tentang penanganan kawasan eks-PLG Kalimantan Tengah. CIMTROP Universitas Negeri Palangkaraya, PalangkarayaGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris EK, Caruso T, Buscot F, Fischer M, Hancock C, Maier TS, Meiners T, Müller C, Obermaier E, Prati D, Socher SA, Sonnemann I, Wäschke N, Wubet T, Wurst S (2014) MC Rillig (2014) Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories. Ecol Evol 4(18):3514–3524.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. Second edition. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  23. Page SE, Wüst RAJ, Weiss D, Rieley JO, Shotyk W, Limin SH (2004) A record of late pleistocene and holocene carbon accumulation and climate change from an equatorial peat bog (Kalimantan, Indonesia): implications for past, present and future carbon dynamics. J Quat Sci 19:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pengener C, Kikami D, Rao KS, Goswamee RL, Sinhai D (2015) Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon from the biowaste of the plant Manihot Esculenta. Chem Sci Trans 4(1):59–68.  https://doi.org/10.7598/cst2015.958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rachmanadi D, Sumardi Faridah E, Van der Meer PJ (2017) Keanekeragaman Potensi Regenerasi Vegetasi pada Hutan Rawa Gambut: Studi Kasus di Kawasan Hutan Dengan Tujuan Khusus (KHDTK) Tumbang Nusa, Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan 11(2):224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ridlo R (1997) CO2 emissions at peat reclamation for mega rice project in Central Kalimantan. J Alami 2:57–58 (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  27. Rieley J, Page S (2016) Tropical peatland of the world. In: Osaki M, Tsuji N (eds) Tropical peatland ecosystems. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  28. Schimada S, Takahashi H, Haraguchi A, Kaneko M (2001) The carbon content characteristics of tropical peats in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia: Estimating their spatial variability in density. J Biogeochem 53:249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sorensen KW (1993) Indonesian peat swamp forests and their role as a carbon sink. J Chemosphere 27(6):1065–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whittaker RH (1974) Climax concepts and recognition. In: Knapp R (ed) Vegetation dynamics; handbook of vegetation science 8. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 139–154Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Forestry UGMYogyakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Banjarbaru Environment and Forestry Research and Development InstituteBanjarbaruIndonesia
  3. 3.SEAMEO BIOTROPBogorIndonesia
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and PlanningUniversitas Islam IndonesiaYogyakartaIndonesia
  5. 5.Faculty of Agriculture, Fishery and BiologyUniversitas Bangka BelitungBangkaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations