Life cycle assessment of a decentralized greywater treatment alternative for non-potable reuse application
- 79 Downloads
The decentralized wastewater treatment systems including collection, treatment, and recycling of treated wastewater are an efficient integrated water management solution to overcome the shortage of freshwater and to reduce pollutant emissions. In this study, life cycle assessment was performed in order to evaluate a decentralized alternative allowing the recycling of treated greywater (TGW) in a multi-family dwelling. The adopted treatment system is the moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). The biological treatment with MBBRs was found the main contributor to the majority of the investigated impact categories. The integration of the tertiary treatment led to an increase in the environmental load ranging between 6 and 30.4% depending on the impact category in comparison with the scenario integrating only the biological treatment. However, the final environmental profile of both scenarios presented a minor difference. Moreover, the recycling of the TGW allowed a reduction ranging between 3.9 and 17% on five impact categories compared to the no recycling scenario. It is concluded that the decentralized approach for greywater treatment and recycling is beneficial for the environment as the distribution system and the tertiary treatment didn’t increase drastically the environmental load of the plant allowing water saving. Moreover, it is recommended to use renewable energy to reduce the environmental impact associated with the energy requirement for the biological treatment which affects the global warming potential and the acidification impact categories and to substitute the polyvinylchloride pipes with polyethylene pipes to reduce emissions related to the human toxicity impact category.
KeywordsWastewater Process Environmental impact assessment Recycling
This study was developed in the framework of sandwich thesis between the Technical University of Berlin and the University of Carthage in Tunisia. The authors wish to thank the company Nolde & Partner innovative Wasserkonzepte, Berlin, and particularly Mr. Erwin Nolde for his helpful, technical support and availability for the development of this work. Ms. Khaoula Masmoudi Jabri thanks the financial support from the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Tunisia, and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Conflict of Interest The author declare that they have no conflict of interestReferences
- 2030 Water Research group (2009) Charting our water future economic frameworks to inform decision-makingGoogle Scholar
- Abdel-Kader AM (2012) Studying the efficiency of grey water treatment by using rotating biological contactors system. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 25:89–95Google Scholar
- AGEB (2016) https://1-stromvergleich.com/strom-report/renewable-energy-germany/. Accessed 01.11.17
- European Commission (2018) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on minimum requirements for water reuseGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14040 (2006) environmental management-life cycle assessment—principles and framework. European committee for standardizationGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management-life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. European committee for standardizationGoogle Scholar
- Masmoudi Jabri K (2018) Contribution to the optimization of biological greywater treatment by modeling and life cycle assessment. Dissertation, University of Carthage, TU BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Stinauer J (2018) Residential city profile. Jones Lang LaSalle GmbH. https://docplayer.org/66510675-Residential-city-profile-berlin-1-halbjahr-2017-erschienen-im-august-berlin.html