Advertisement

Effect of vanadium on germination, growth and activities of amylase and antioxidant enzymes in genotypes of rice

  • Y. Yuan
  • M. ImtiazEmail author
  • M. Rizwan
  • X. Dong
  • S. Tu
Original Paper
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Vanadium causes metabolic interruption with normal growth of plants, and therefore, contamination issues are of major concern. Seed germination is a critical point in seedling establishment and subsequent plant health and vigor. The present study was carried out to assess the physio-biochemical responses: seed germination, seedling growth, activities of antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymes, and amylase contents in rice varieties. The obtained results showed variations in all observed parameters, and the rice varieties respond differently to vanadium treatments. Overall, the protrusion and germination rates of rice seeds were affected and reduced when exposed to vanadium. The fresh biomass and height of shoots and roots were also decreased when seedlings of rice were exposed to vanadium, especially at 30 mg L−1. The results about antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymes indicated that rice varieties respond differently; however, the activities of antioxidant enzymes were increased when treated with vanadium. Furthermore, the contents of antioxidant non-enzymes were also altered in all rice varieties seedlings when exposed to vanadium. The soluble protein contents were also significantly declined in all rice varieties when treated with vanadium. The activities of α, β and total amylase enzymes in rice seeds were also affected when exposed to vanadium; taken as whole, the maximum observed inhibition in amylolytic enzyme activities was observed at 30 mg L−1 of vanadium treatment. In summary, rice seedlings were markedly influenced in terms of seed germination, early growth as well as amylase contents when exposed to vanadium. Overall, the toxic effects of vanadium with respect to rice varieties are maximum during seed germination and growth while variations regarding amylase activities were recorded. These results suggested that rice varieties: Chao you 37 and Chao ji 1 hao exhibited maximum losses, while less damage in Tai guo xiang nuo and Qi dao 2000 might be related to strong antioxidant defense system proved them to be tolerant against vanadium.

Keywords

Rice Genotypes Vanadium Seed germination Growth Antioxidant enzymes Amylase 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by Hubei Special Project for Technique Innovation (2017ABA154), National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0800900), Guangxi Major Special Project of Science and Technique (GuikeAA17202026-3), National Natural Science Foundation China (41650110482) and Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303106).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any competing of interest. Furthermore, all the authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13762_2019_2451_MOESM1_ESM.docx (57 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 57 kb)

References

  1. Aebi HE, Bergmeyer HO (1983) Catalase, methods enzymology. Academic, New York, p 2Google Scholar
  2. Akinci I, Akinci S (2010) Effect of chromium toxicity on germination and early seedling growth in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Afr J Biotechnol 9(29):4589–4594Google Scholar
  3. Aydinalp C, Marinova S (2009) The effects of heavy metals on seed germination and plant growth on alfalfa plant (Medicago sativa). Bulg J Agric Sci 15:347–350Google Scholar
  4. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44:276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnet M, Camares O, Veisseire P (2000) Effects of zinc and influence of Acremonium lolii on growth parameters, chlorophyll a fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activities of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv Apollo). J Exp Bot 51:945–953Google Scholar
  6. Cheng S (2003) Heavy metal pollution in China: origin, pattern and control. Environ Sci Pollut Res 10:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dazy M, Masfaraud JF, Ferard JF (2009) Induction of oxidative stress biomarkers associated with heavy metal stress in Fontinalis antipyretica Hedw. Chemosphere 75:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Andrade SAR, da Silveira APD (2008) Mycorrhiza influence on maize development under Cd stress and P supply. Braz J Plant Physiol 20:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng Y, Wang W, Yu P, Xi Z, Xu L, Li X, He N (2013) Comparison of taurine, GABA, Glu, and Asp as scavengers of malondialdehyde in vitro and in vivo. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts I. Kinetic and stoichiometery of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 125:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hussain S, Aslam N, Yang XY, Javed MS, Xu ZW, Wang ZW, Liu GW, Qiao GJ (2018) Unique polyhedron CeO2 nanostructures for superior formaldehyde gas-sensing performances. Ceram Int 44(16):19624–19630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Imtiaz M, Tu S, Xie ZJ, Han D, Ashraf M, Rizwan MS (2015) Growth, V uptake, and antioxidant enzymes responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under vanadium stress. Plant Soil 390:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Imtiaz M, Mushtaq MA, Rizwan MS, Arif MS, Yousaf B, Ashraf M, Xiong SL, Rizwan M, Mehmood S, Tu S (2016) Comparison of antioxidant enzymes activities and DNA damage in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes exposed to vanadium. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19787–19796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Imtiaz M, Ashraf M, Rizwan MS, Nawaz MA, Rizwan M, Mehmood S, Yousaf B, Yuan Y, Ditta A, Mumtaz MA, Ali M, Mahmood S, Tu S (2018) Vanadium toxicity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown in red soil: effects on cell death, ROS and antioxidative systems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 158:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaneko M, Itoh H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M (2002) The α-amylase induction in endosperm during rice seed germination is caused by gibberellin synthesized in epithelium. Plant Physiol 128:1264–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kraepiel AM, Bellenger JP, Wichard T, Morel FM (2009) Multiple roles of siderophores in free living nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Biometals 22:573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liang YC, Sun WC, Zhu YG, Christie P (2007) Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of abiotic stresses in higher plants: a review. Environ Pollut 147:422–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mikami B, Adachi M, Kage T, Sarikaya E, Nanmori T, Shinke R, Utsumi S (1999) Structure of raw starch-digesting Bacillus cereus beta-amylase complexed with maltose. Biochemistry 38(22):7050–7061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naeem A, Westerhoff P, Mustafa S (2007) Vanadium removal by metal (hydr) oxide adsorbents. Water Res 41:1596–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Putter J (1974) Peroxidases. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis: II. Academic Press, New York, pp 685–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Radha S, Rajesh D (2011) Biochemical changes and adaptive strategies of plants under heavy metal stress. Biologia 66:195–204Google Scholar
  22. Raziuddin, Farhatullah, Hassan G, Akmal M, Shah SS, Mohammad F, Shafi M, Bakht J, Zhou W (2011) Effects of cadmium and salinity on growth and photosynthesis parameters of Brassica species. Pak J Bot 43:333-340Google Scholar
  23. Sedlak J, Lindsay RH (1968) Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal Biochem 25:1192–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seregin IV, Kozhevnikova AD (2005) Distribution of cadmium, lead, nickel, and strontium in imbibing maize caryopses. Russ J Plant Physiol 52:565–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sfaxi-Bousbih A, Chaoui A, El Ferjani E (2010) Cadmium impairs mineral and carbohydrate mobilization during germination of bean seeds. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:1123–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shafiq M, Iqbal MZ, Athar M (2008) Effect of lead and cadmium germination and seedling growth of Leucaena leucocephala. J Sci Environ Manage 12:61–66Google Scholar
  27. Singh HP, Kaur G, Batish DR, Kohli RK (2011) Lead (Pb)-inhibited radicle emergence in Brassica compestris involves alterations in starch-metabolizing enzymes. Biol Trace Elem Res 144:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun RL, Zhou QZ, Sun FH, Jin CX (2007) Antioxidative defense and proline/phytochelatin accumulation in a newly discovered Cd hypperacunulator, Solanum nigrum L. Environ Exp Bot 60:468–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swain RR, Dekker EEC (1966) Seed germination studies. II. Pathway of starch degradation in germinating pea seedlings. Biochim Biophys Acta 122:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tewari RK, Kumar P, Sharma PN (2006) Antioxidant responses to enhanced generation of superoxide anion radical and hydrogen peroxide in the copper-stressed mulberry plants. Planta 223:1145–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang J, Tang Y, Yang K, Rouff AA, Elzinga EJ, Huang JH (2014) Leaching characteristics of vanadium in mine tailings and soils near a vanadium titanomagnetite mining site. J Hazard Mater 264:498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Resources and EnvironmentHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Soil and Environmental Biotechnology DivisionNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic EngineeringFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations