Advertisement

Microsegmented flow-assisted miniaturized culturing for isolation and characterization of heavy metal-tolerant bacteria

  • J. CaoEmail author
  • F. Kalensee
  • P. M. Günther
  • J. M. Köhler
Original Paper

Abstract

Soils are complex ecosystem, and their function in the environment is mainly determined by the microbial communities. Metal-tolerant micro-organisms have an important function in the formation of soil and the development of microbial communities in all areas where heavy metals are released by natural erosion processes or by human activities. The investigation of dose-dependent growth and behaviour is an essential part of the search for heavy metal-tolerant microorganism communities and their characterization. In this study, next-generation sequencing was used for the analysis of soil sample and reduced communities and droplet-based microfluidics was used to assess the growth behaviour of unknown bacterial communities and single strains in response to different heavy metal ions. Highly resolved dose–response functions of the bacterial communities reflect the specific character in their concentration-dependent response to different culture media and heavy metals of copper, nickel and cobalt. Besides the characterization of community responses, they allowed to characterize newly isolated strains. Concentration-dependent growth patterns of the micro-organisms in the droplets could be observed. The investigation demonstrates the potential of droplet-based microfluidics for miniaturized eco-toxicological studies and their suitability for the discovery of novel strains with special tolerance features.

Keywords

Droplet-based microfluidics Soil microbial communities Segmented flow Heavy metal tolerance Next-generation sequencing Dose–response 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the framework of Bactocat (Project Number 031A161A). We thank Karin Martin, Martin Roth (HKI Jena) and Erika Kothe (FSU Jena) for stimulating discussions on miniaturized screenings for soil bacteria.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Belapurkar P, Goyal P, Kar A (2016) In vitro evaluation of bioremediation capacity of a commercial probiotic, Bacillus coagulans, for chromium (VI) and lead (II) toxicity. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 8:272–276.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.199344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bender CL, Malvick DK, Conway KE, George S, Pratt P (1990) Characterization of pXV10A, a copper resistance plasmid in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beneyton T, Thomas S, Griffiths AD, Nicaud J-M, Drevelle A, Rossignol T (2017) Droplet-based microfluidic high-throughput screening of heterologous enzymes secreted by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Microb Cell Fact 16:18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0629-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya C, Bakshi U, Mallick I, Mukherji S, Bera B, Ghosh A (2017) Genome-guided insights into the plant growth promotion capabilities of the physiologically versatile Bacillus aryabhattai strain AB211. Front Microbiol 8:411.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao JL, Kohler JM (2015) Droplet-based microfluidics for microtoxicological studies. Eng Life Sci 15:306–317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201400074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao JL, Kursten D, Schneider S, Knauer A, Gunther PM, Kohler JM (2012) Uncovering toxicological complexity by multi-dimensional screenings in microsegmented flow: modulation of antibiotic interference by nanoparticles. Lab Chip 12:474–484.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20584f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao JL, Kursten D, Krause K, Kothe E, Martin K, Roth M, Kohler JM (2013) Application of micro-segmented flow for two-dimensional characterization of the combinatorial effect of zinc and copper ions on metal-tolerant Streptomyces strains. Appl Microbiol Biot 97:8923–8930.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5147-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cidre I, Pulido RP, Burgos MJG, Galvez A, Lucas R (2017) Copper and zinc tolerance in bacteria isolated from fresh produce. J Food Protect 80:969–975.  https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.Jfp-16-513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Classen T, Pietruszka J, Schuback SM (2013) A new multicopper oxidase from Gram-positive bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis with activity modulating methionine rich tail. Protein Express Purif 89:97–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2013.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Carvalho CC (2012) Adaptation of Rhodococcus erythropolis cells for growth and bioremediation under extreme conditions. Res Microbiol 163:125–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2011.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demain AL, Adrio JL (2008) Contributions of microorganisms to industrial biology. Mol Biotechnol 38:41–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-007-0035-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donadio S, Maffioli S, Monciardini P, Sosio M, Jabes D (2010) Antibiotic discovery in the twenty-first century: current trends and future perspectives. J Antibiot 63:423–430.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2010.62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drancourt M, Berger P, Raoult D (2004) Systematic 16S rRNA gene sequencing of atypical clinical isolates identified 27 new bacterial species associated with humans. J Clin Microbiol 42:2197–2202.  https://doi.org/10.1128/Jcm.42.5.2197-2202.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egidi E, Wood JL, Fox EM, Liu W, Franks AE (2016) Draft genome sequence of Rhodococcus erythropolis NSX2, an actinobacterium isolated from a cadmium-contaminated environment. Genome Announc 4:e01147.  https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01147-16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Funfak A, Cao JL, Knauer A, Martin K, Kohler JM (2011) Synergistic effects of metal nanoparticles and a phenolic uncoupler using microdroplet-based two-dimensional approach. J Environ Monitor 13:410–415.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0em00162g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleeson D, McDermott F, Clipson N (2006) Structural diversity of bacterial communities in a heavy metal mineralized granite outcrop. Environ Microbiol 8:383–393.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00903.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo JK, Lin YB, Zhao ML, Sun R, Wang TT, Tang M, Wei GH (2009) Streptomyces plumbiresistens sp. nov., a lead-resistant actinomycete isolated from lead-polluted soil in north-west China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:1326–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.004713-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta K, Chatterjee C, Gupta B (2012) Isolation and characterization of heavy metal tolerant Gram-positive bacteria with bioremedial properties from municipal waste rich soil of Kestopur canal (Kolkata), West Bengal, India. Biologia 67:827–836.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0099-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haferburg G, Groth I, Mollmann U, Kothe E, Sattler I (2009) Arousing sleeping genes: shifts in secondary metabolism of metal tolerant actinobacteria under conditions of heavy metal stress. Biometals 22:225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-008-9157-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassen A, Saidi N, Cherif M, Boudabous A (1998) Resistance of environmental bacteria to heavy metals. Bioresour Technol 64:7–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00161-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. He ZLL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ (2005) Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J Trace Elem Med Biol 19:125–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Brit Med Bull 68:167–182.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glockner FO (2013) Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knauer A, Kohler JM (2013) Screening of multiparameter spaces for silver nanoprism synthesis by microsegmented flow technique. Chem Ing Tech 85:467–475.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201200206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohler JM, Henkel T, Grodrian A, Kirner T, Roth M, Martin K, Metze J (2004) Digital reaction technology by micro segmented flow—components, concepts and applications. Chem Eng J 101:201–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2003.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Komeda H, Kobayashi M, Shimizu S (1997) A novel transporter involved in cobalt uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kresse H, Belsey MJ, Rovini H (2007) The antibacterial drugs market. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:19–20.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kursten D, Kothe E, Wetzel K, Bergmann K, Kohler JM (2014) Micro-segmented flow and multisensor-technology for microbial activity profiling. Environ Sci Process Impact 16:2362–2370.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4em00255e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kursten D, Moller F, Gross GA, Lenk C, Visaveliya N, Schuler T, Kohler JM (2015) Identification of response classes from heavy metal-tolerant soil microbial communities by highly resolved concentration-dependent screenings in a microfluidic system. Methods Ecol Evol 6:600–609.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langelüttich H-J, Mirsch R, Knitzschke G, Roloff P, Spilker M, Wordelmann H (1999) Bergbau auf Kupferschiefer. In: Roloff P (ed) Die Geschichte des Berg- und Hüttenwesens. Verein Mansfelder Berg- und Hüttenleute, Mansfeld, pp 41–204Google Scholar
  31. Li H, Lin Y, Guan W, Chang J, Xu L, Guo J, Wei G (2010) Biosorption of Zn(II) by live and dead cells of Streptomyces ciscaucasicus strain CCNWHX 72-14. J Hazard Mater 179:151–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liebeke M, Brozel VS, Hecker M, Lalk M (2009) Chemical characterization of soil extract as growth media for the ecophysiological study of bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biot 83:161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1965-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martinez-Bussenius C, Navarro CA, Jerez CA (2017) Microbial copper resistance: importance in biohydrometallurgy. Microb Biotechnol 10:279–295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Najah M, Calbrix R, Mahendra-Wijaya IP, Beneyton T, Griffiths AD, Drevelle A (2014) Droplet-based microfluidics platform for ultra-high-throughput bioprospecting of cellulolytic microorganisms. Chem Biol 21:1722–1732.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nguyen TM, Seo C, Ji M, Paik MJ, Myung SW, Kim J (2018) Effective soil extraction method for cultivating previously uncultured soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microb.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01145-18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nwuche CO, Ugoji EO (2008) Effects of heavy metal pollution on the soil microbial activity. Int J Environ Sci Technol 5:409–414.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf03326036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quast C et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt A et al (2009) Heavy metal resistance to the extreme: Streptomyces strains from a former uranium mining area. Chem Erde Geochem 69:35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2007.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silver S, Phung LT (1996) Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprises. Annu Rev Microbiol 50:753–789.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stanley CE, Grossmann G, Solvas XCI, deMello AJ (2016) Soil-on-a-Chip: microfluidic platforms for environmental organismal studies. Lab Chip 16:228–241.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc01285f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stucky BJ (2012) SeqTrace: a graphical tool for rapidly processing DNA sequencing chromatograms. J Biomol Tech 23:90–93.  https://doi.org/10.7171/jbt.12-2303-004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor CB (1951) Nature of the factor in soil-extract responsible for bacterial growth-stimulation. Nature 168:115–116.  https://doi.org/10.1038/168115a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ (2012) Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. In: Luch A (ed) Molecular, clinical and environmental toxicology, vol 3 and 101. Springer, Basel, pp 133–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turgay OC, Gormez A, Bilen S (2012) Isolation and characterization of metal resistant-tolerant rhizosphere bacteria from the serpentine soils in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 184:515–526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1984-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vincent ME, Liu WS, Haney EB, Ismagilov RF (2010) Microfluidic stochastic confinement enhances analysis of rare cells by isolating cells and creating high density environments for control of diffusible signals. Chem Soc Rev 39:974–984.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b917851a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu XY, Cobbina SJ, Mao GH, Xu H, Zhang Z, Yang LQ (2016) A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:8244–8259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yilmaz P et al (2014) The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D643–D648.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J (2017) Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613–1617.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Chemistry and Microreaction Technology, Institute for Micro- and Nanotechnologies/Institute for Chemistry and BiotechniqueIlmenau University of TechnologyIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations