Advertisement

Preparation, characterization of novel poly(hydroxybutyrate)/poly(butylene succinate)/ZnO porous resin and application in groundwater purification

  • M. M. El-ToonyEmail author
  • Gh. Eid
  • S. A. Asiri
  • H. M. Algarni
Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Gamma irradiation was used for the crosslinking 2% poly(hydroxybutyrate) with poly(butylene succinate), zinc oxide nanoparticles and glass wool prior to being foamed with carbon dioxide. It was found that 20 kGy was the optimum dose for attaining the finally crosslinking and the accepted physical properties. Characterizations of the milled composite (porous resin) were carried out using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, while the ion exchange capacity has evaluated. Some physical properties of the prepared resin such as water uptake, AC electrical conductivity, and their porosity were studied by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy, and BET method which put spot of light on pollutants sorption. Characterization of the groundwater before and after treatment was performed based on turbidity, odor, water conductivity, total dissolved solids, and some essential ions such as sodium, potassium calcium chloride, and nitrate. The pH, rotavirus, and bacterial counting were also determined at initial 3.4 mg/L dissolved oxygen. Some parameters were discussed such as resin/water’s contact time, and their temperature. The porous resin (PHBBS-Pr) was successfully recommended to purify the groundwater for drinking water in comparison with commercial one (Purolite C115 E).

Keywords

Irradiation Porous resin Polymers Characterization Groundwater Purification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank King Khalid University for funding this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Hady EE, El-Toony MM, Abdel-Hamed MO (2013) Grafting of glycidyl methacrylate/styrene onto poly vinyldine fluoride membranes for proton exchange fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 103:32–37Google Scholar
  2. Ali I, Gupta VK (2006) Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat Protoc 1:2661–2667Google Scholar
  3. Alshahateet SF, Jiries AG, Al-Trawneh SA, Eldouhaibi AS, Al-Mahadeen MM (2016) Kinetic equilibrium and selectivity studies of heavy metal ions (Pb(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Mn(II), and Zn(II)) removal from water using synthesized C-4-methoxyphenylcalix[4]resorcinarene adsorbent. Desaliat Water Treat 57:4512–4522Google Scholar
  4. Baruah S, Pal SK, Dutta J (2012) Nanostructured zinc oxide for water treatment. Nanosci Nanotechnol-Asia 2:90–102Google Scholar
  5. Burrow MF, Inokoshi Tagami J (1999) Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent 12:295–298Google Scholar
  6. Campopiano A, Cannizzaro A, Angelosanto F, Astolfi ML, Ramires D, Olori A, Canepari S, Iavicoli S (2014) Dissolution of glass wool, rock wool and alkaline earth silicate wool: morphological and chemical changes in fibers. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 70:393–406Google Scholar
  7. Dai J, Ren F, Tao C (2012) Adsorption of Cr(VI) and speciation of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in aqueous solutions using chemically modified chitosan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9:1757–1770Google Scholar
  8. Demiral H, Demiral I, Tümsek F, Karabacakoğlu B (2008) Adsorption of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution by activated carbon derived from olive bagasse and applicability of different adsorption models. Chem Eng J 144:188–196Google Scholar
  9. Ehlers MM, Grabow WO, Pavlov DN (2005) Detection of enteroviruses in untreated and treated drinking water supplies in South Africa. Water Res 39:2253–2258Google Scholar
  10. Elimelech M, Phillip WA (2011) The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333:712–717Google Scholar
  11. El-Toony MM (2017) Casting of polyacrylamide/poly (vinyl alcohol) reinforced by carbon nano-wire for using into proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Egy J Chem 60:779–791Google Scholar
  12. El-Toony MM, El-Kelesh NA, Abdel-Shafy HI (2010) Synthesis and characterization of foam (PVA/AAC) and application with alum for reduction of Turbidity, Ca++, Mg++ Ions and microbial count in Nile River. Water 2:108–119Google Scholar
  13. El-Toony MM, Abdel-Hady EE, El-Kelsh NA (2014) Casting of poly hydroxybutarate/poly (vinyl alcohol) membranes for proton exchange fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 150:290–297Google Scholar
  14. El-Toony MM, Abdel-Hady EE, El-Kelsh NA (2016) Casting of poly (vinyl alcohol/glycidyl methacrylate reinforced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles for proton exchange fuel cells. J Solid State Electrochem 20:1913–1920Google Scholar
  15. Emelita ASD, Ching-Shan H, Rose MOM, Ming-Chun L (2018) Zinc oxide nanoparticles for water disinfection. Sustain Environ Res 28:47–56Google Scholar
  16. Engelman R, LeRoy P (1993) Sustaining water. Population and the future of renewable water supplies. Population Action International, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Florez JP, Fazeli M, Simão RA (2019) Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic starch composite reinforced by plasma-treated poly (hydroxybutyrate) PHB. Inter J Biologic Macromol 123:609–621Google Scholar
  18. Galia MB (2010) Isolation and analysis of storage compounds. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 3725–3741Google Scholar
  19. Gantzer C, Senouci S, Maul A, Levi Y, Schwartzbrod L (1997) Enterovirus genomes in wastewater: concentration on glass wool and glass powder and detection by RT-PCR. J Virol Methods 65:265–271Google Scholar
  20. Guo F, Wang J, Du Y, Wang J, Shang S-L, Li S, Chen L (2018) First-principles study of adsorption and diffusion of oxygen on surfaces of TiN, ZrN and HfN. App Surf Sci 452:457–462Google Scholar
  21. Hentze H-P, Antonietti M (2002) Porous polymers and resins for biotechnological and biomedical applications. Rev Molecul Biotechnol 90:27–53Google Scholar
  22. Hu J, Chen Y, Guo L, Chen X (2015) Chemical-free ion exchange and its application for desalination. Desalinat 365:144–150Google Scholar
  23. Khan MI, Wu L, Hossain MM, Pan J, Ran J, Mondal AN, Xu TW (2015) Preparation of diffusion dialysis membrane for acid recovery via a phase inversion method. Memb Water Treat 6:365–378Google Scholar
  24. Khan MI, Mondal AN, Tong BCJ, Emmanuel K, Yang ZL, Wu TW (2016a) Development of BPPO-based anion exchange membranes for electrodialysis desalination applications. Desalinat 391:61–68Google Scholar
  25. Khan MI, Mondal AN, Cheng C, Pan J, Emmanuel K, Wu L, Xu TW (2016b) Porous BPPO based membranes modified by aromatic amine for acid recovery. Sep Purif Technol 157:27–34Google Scholar
  26. Khan MI, Zheng C, Mondal Hossain M, Wu B, Emmanuel K, Wu L, Xu T (2017) Preparation of anion exchange membranes from BPPO and dimethylethanolamine for electrodialysis. Desalination 402:10–18Google Scholar
  27. Kim S-J, Han D, Yu H-W, O’Rourke BE, Kobayashi Y, Suzuki R, Hwang M, Kim IS (2018) Performance evaluation of polyamide TFC membranes: effects of free volume properties on boron transport. Desalination 432:104–114Google Scholar
  28. Li L, Qu W, Zhang X, Lu J, Chen R, Wu F, Amine K (2015) Succinic acid-based leaching system: a sustainable process for recovery of valuable metals from spent Li-ion batteries. J Power Sources 282:544–551Google Scholar
  29. Li J, Jin P, Dai W, Wang C, Li R, Wu T, Tang C (2017) Excellent performance for water purification achieved by activated porous boron nitride nanosheets. Mat Chem Phys 196:186–193Google Scholar
  30. Liu M, Shen S, Zhao X, Ye Y, Li J, Zhu Q, Zhao B, Zhao W, Huang X, Shen J (2013) Biocompatible phosphonic acid-functionalized silica nanoparticles for sensitive detection of hypoxanthine in real samples. Talanta 17:536–542Google Scholar
  31. Ly H-B, Le Droumaguet B, Monchiet V, Grande D (2015a) Designing and modeling doubly porous polymeric materials. Eur Phys J Spec Top 224:1689–1706Google Scholar
  32. Ly HB, Le Droumaguet B, Monchiet V, Grande D (2015b) Facile fabrication of doubly porous polymeric materials with controlled nano- and macro-porosity. Polymer 78:13–21Google Scholar
  33. Matsis VM, Grigoropoulou HP (2008) Kinetics and equilibrium of dissolved oxygen adsorption on activated carbon. Chem Eng Sci 63:609–621Google Scholar
  34. Movasaghia Z, Yanb B, Niu C (2019) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin from water by pretreated oat hulls: equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Industr Crops Prod 127:237–250Google Scholar
  35. Munir S, Daood SS, Nimmo W, Cunliffe AM, Gibbs BM (2009) Thermal analysis and devolatilization kinetics of cotton stalk, sugar cane bagasse and shea meal under nitrogen and air atmospheres. Bioresour Technol 100:1413–1418Google Scholar
  36. Oliveira FC, Das MC, Castilho LR, Freire MG (2007) Characterization of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) produced by Cupriavidus necator in solid-state fermentation. Bioresource Technol 98:633–638Google Scholar
  37. Padmavathy N, Vijayaraghavan R (2008) Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles—an antimicrobial study. Sci Technol Adv Mater 9:035004Google Scholar
  38. Pearce M, Brennan F (2015) Novel findings in desalination. Desalination 360:13–18Google Scholar
  39. Qiu Z, Ikehara T, Nishi T (2003) Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/poly(butylene succinate) blends miscibility and non-isothermal crystallization. Polymer 44:2503–2508Google Scholar
  40. Relleve LS, Gallardo AKR, Abad LV (2018) Radiation crosslinking of carboxymethyl hyaluronic acid. Radiat Phys Chem 151:211–216Google Scholar
  41. Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW, Llewellyn P, Maurin G (2014) Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Serajim MM, Kianersi S, Hosseini SH, Davarpanah J, Elahi S (2018) Performance evaluation of glass and rock wool fibers to improve thermal stability and mechanical strength of monolithic phenol-formaldehyde based carbon aerogels. J Non-Crystall Solids 491:89–97Google Scholar
  43. Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Marinas BJ, Mayes AM (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452:301–310Google Scholar
  44. Sharara M, Sadaka S (2014) Thermo-gravimetric analysis of swine manure solids obtained from farrowing, and growing-finishing farms. J Sustain Bioenergy Syst 4:75–86Google Scholar
  45. Shen XL, Li TJ, Jiang XP, Chen XM (2014) Desalination of water with high conductivity using membrane-free electro-deionization. Sep Purif Technol 128:39–44Google Scholar
  46. Siljeg M, Foglar L, Kukuck M (2010) The groundwater ammonium sorption onto Croatian and Serbian clinoptilolite. J Hazard Mat 178:572–577Google Scholar
  47. Sing KSW (1994) Physisorption of gases by carbon–carbon black. Carbon 32:1311–1317Google Scholar
  48. Söylemez MA, Güven O (2019) Preparation and detailed structural characterization of penicillin G imprinted polymers by PALS and XPS. Radiat Phys Chem 159:174–180Google Scholar
  49. Stoimenov PK, Klinger RL, Marchin GL, Klabunde KJ (2002) Metal oxide nanoparticles as bactericidal agents. Langmuir 18:6679–6686Google Scholar
  50. Sun Z, Chaia L, Shu Y, Li Q, Liu M, Qiu D (2017) Chemical bond between chloride ions and surface carboxyl groups on activated carbon. Colloids Surf A 530:53–59Google Scholar
  51. Svarovskaya NV, Bakina OV, Glazkova EA, Fomenko AN, Lerner MI (2017) Glass and cellulose acetate fibers-supported boehmite nanosheets for bacteria adsorption. Prog Nat Sci: Mat Internation 27:268–274Google Scholar
  52. Tanaka J, Ishikawa K, Yatani H, Yamashita A, Suzuki K (1999) Correlation of dentin bond durability with water absorption of bonding layer. Dent Mater J 18:11–18Google Scholar
  53. Tao Y-X, Besant RW, Simonson CJ (1993) Measurement of the heat of adsorption for a typical fibrous insulation. ASHRAE Trans 98:495–501Google Scholar
  54. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069Google Scholar
  55. van Zyl WB, Williams PJ, Grabow WO, Taylor MB (2004) Application of a molecular method for the detection of group A rotaviruses in raw and treated water. Water Sci Technol 50:223–228Google Scholar
  56. Verlinden RAJ, Hill DJ, Kenward MA, Williams CD, Radecka I (2007) Bacterial synthesis of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Appl Microbiol 102:1437–1449Google Scholar
  57. Vijayaraghavan R (2012) Zinc oxide based inorganic antimicrobial agents. Int J Sci Res 1:35–46Google Scholar
  58. Villegas M, ElzC Vidaurre, Habert A, Gottifredi J (2011) Sorption and pervaporation with poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) membranes: methanol/methyl tert-butyl ether mixtures. Memb Sci J 367:103–109Google Scholar
  59. Wang H, Peng H, Li G, Chen K (2015a) Nitrogen-containing carbon/graphene composite nanosheets with excellent lithium storage performances. Chem Eng J 275:160–167Google Scholar
  60. Wang R, Song H, Li H, Wang H, Mao X, Ji S (2015b) Mesoporous nitrogen-doped carbon derived from carp with high electrocatalytic performance for oxygen reduction reaction. J Power Sources 278:213–217Google Scholar
  61. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Zhengn C, Lee CD, Liang DT (2006) In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Energy Fuels 20:388–393Google Scholar
  62. Yiu CKY, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MRO, Tay FR (2004) Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomat 25:5789–5796Google Scholar
  63. Yu J, Zhao X, Yang H, Chen X, Yang Q, Yu L, Jiang J, Chen X (2014) Aqueous adsorption and removal of organic contaminants by carbon nanotubes. Sci Total Environ 482:241–251Google Scholar
  64. Yu D, Ma Y, Chen M, Dong X (2019) KOH activation of wax gourd-derived carbon materials with high porosity and heteroatom content for aqueous or all-solid-state supercapacitors. J Colloid Interface Sci 537:569–578Google Scholar
  65. Zhang DM, Cui FZ, Luo ZS, Lin YB, Zhao K, Chen GQ (2000) Wettability improvement of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates via ion implantation. Surf Coat Technol 131:350–354Google Scholar
  66. Zhang LL, Chen B, Xie LL, Li ZF (2011) Study on the antimicrobial properties of ZnO suspension against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria strains. Adv Mater Res 393–5:1488–1491Google Scholar
  67. Zhang Z, He C, Sun T, Zhang Z, Song K, Wu Q, Zhang Q (2016) Thermophysical properties of pretreated agricultural residues for bio-hydrogen production using thermogravimetric analysis. Inter hydrogen energy J 41:5234–5242Google Scholar
  68. Zhou F, Yan C, Wang H, Zhou S, Komarneni S (2017) Sepiolite-TiO2 nanocomposites for photocatalysis: synthesis by microwave hydrothermal treatment versus calcination. Appl Clay Sci 146:246–253Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. El-Toony
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gh. Eid
    • 2
  • S. A. Asiri
    • 1
  • H. M. Algarni
    • 3
  1. 1.Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science and Art, Tehama BranchKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Physics Department, Faculty of Science and Art, Tehama BranchKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.King Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations