Advertisement

Acceleration of acid red 1 dye decolorization efficiency by adding methanol with simultaneous hydrogen production

  • J.-T. Lee
  • E.-C. Su
  • M.-Y. WeyEmail author
Original Paper
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

A promising and efficient pathway for simultaneous photocatalytic decolorization of acid red 1 (AR1) dye and hydrogen production was developed in this study. The results demonstrated that the AR1 decolorization efficiency was accelerated by adding only 15 v/v% methanol, which was attributable to the decreased charge recombination rate caused by methanol molecules. The decreased charge recombination rate led to increased ·OH and ·O2 group formation, resulting in better AR1 decolorization efficiency. The optimal AR1 decolorization efficiency and hydrogen production ability, respectively, reached 99.4% and 1127 μmol/h/g when the AR1 concentration and methanol concentration were, respectively, controlled to 6 mg/L and 15 v/v%. The enhanced AR1 decolorization efficiency was ascribed to the lower rate of electron–hole recombination. Due to the lower electron–hole recombination rate, more electron–hole pairs effectively produced superoxide radicals and hydroxyl radicals, which resulted in substantially enhanced AR1 decolorization efficiency.

Keywords

Photocatalytic oxidation Solar light response Synergistic effect Hydrogen production Dye decolorization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguilar-Martínez O, Hernández-Gordillo A, Pérez-Hernández R, Acevedo-Peña P, Arrieta-Castañeda A, Gómez R, Tzompantzi F (2017) Efficient ZnO1–xSx composites from the Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6 precursor for the H2 production by photocatalysis. Renew Energy 113:43–51Google Scholar
  2. Akpan U, Hameed B (2011) Solar degradation of an azo dye, acid red 1, by Ca–Ce–W–TiO2 composite catalyst. Chem Eng J 169:91–99Google Scholar
  3. Arzate Salgado SY, Ramírez Zamora RM, Zanella R, Peral J, Malato S, Maldonado MI (2016) Photocatalytic hydrogen production in a solar pilot plant using a Au/TiO2 photo catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:11933–11940Google Scholar
  4. Chen W-T, Chan A, Al-Azri ZHN, Dosado AG, Nadeem MA, Sun-Waterhouse D, Idriss H, Waterhouse GIN (2015) Effect of TiO2 polymorph and alcohol sacrificial agent on the activity of Au/TiO2 photocatalysts for H2 production in alcohol–water mixtures. J Catal 329:499–513Google Scholar
  5. Chiarello GL, Aguirre MH, Selli E (2010) Hydrogen production by photocatalytic steam reforming of methanol on noble metal-modified TiO2. J Catal 273:182–190Google Scholar
  6. Colmenares JC, Magdziarz A, Aramendia MA, Marinas A, Marinas JM, Urbano FJ, Navio JA (2011) Influence of the strong metal support interaction effect (SMSI) of Pt/TiO2 and Pd/TiO2 systems in the photocatalytic biohydrogen production from glucose solution. Catal Commun 16:1–6Google Scholar
  7. Daneshvar N, Salari D, Khataee AR (2004) Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye acid red 14 in water on ZnO as an alternative catalyst to TiO2. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 162:317–322Google Scholar
  8. Daşdelen Z, Yıldız Y, Eriş S, Şen F (2017) Enhanced electrocatalytic activity and durability of Pt nanoparticles decorated on GO-PVP hybride material for methanol oxidation reaction. Appl Catal B Environ 219:511–516Google Scholar
  9. de Santiago Colín DM, Martínez-Chávez LA, Cuán Á, Elizalde-Peña EA, Rivera JA, Guzmán C, Escobar-Alarcón L, Esquivel K (2018) Sonochemical coupled synthesis of Cr–TiO2 supported on Fe3O4 structures and chemical simulation of the degradation mechanism of Malachite Green dye. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 364:250–261Google Scholar
  10. de Souza SMdAGU, Bonilla KAS, de Souza AAU (2010) Removal of COD and color from hydrolyzed textile azo dye by combined ozonation and biological treatment. J Hazard Mater 179:35–42Google Scholar
  11. El-Gahami MA, Mekky AEM, Saleh TS, Al-Bogami AS (2014) Acidity constant and solvatochromic behavior of some pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-2-amine derivatives. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 129:209–218Google Scholar
  12. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:37–38Google Scholar
  13. Gao R, Stark J, Bahnemann DW, Rabani J (2002) Quantum yields of hydroxyl radicals in illuminated TiO2 nanocrystallite layers. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 148:387–391Google Scholar
  14. Guo X, Rao L, Wang P, Wang C, Ao Y, Jiang T, Wang W (2018) Photocatalytic properties of P25-doped TiO2 composite film synthesized via sol–gel method on cement substrate. J Environ Sci 66:71–80Google Scholar
  15. Hu E, Wu X, Shang S, X-m Tao, S-x Jiang, Gan L (2016) Catalytic ozonation of simulated textile dyeing wastewater using mesoporous carbon aerogel supported copper oxide catalyst. J Clean Prod 112(Part 5):4710–4718Google Scholar
  16. Huang B-S, Su E-C, Wey M-Y (2013) Design of a Pt/TiO2–xNx/SrTiO3 triplejunction for effective photocatalytic H2 production under solar light irradiation. Chem Eng J 223:854–859Google Scholar
  17. Huang J, Jiang Y, Li G, Xue C, Guo W (2017) Hetero-structural NiTiO3/TiO2 nanotubes for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Renew Energy 111:410–415Google Scholar
  18. Huang X, Wei D, Yan L, Du B, Wei Q (2018) High-efficient biosorption of dye wastewater onto aerobic granular sludge and photocatalytic regeneration of biosorbent by acid TiO2 hydrosol. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:27606–27613Google Scholar
  19. Jing D, Zhang Y, Guo L (2005) Study on the synthesis of Ni doped mesoporous TiO2 and its photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution in aqueous methanol solution. Chem Phys Lett 415:74–78Google Scholar
  20. Jones W, Martin DJ, Caravaca A, Beale AM, Bowker M, Maschmeyer T, Hartley G, Masters A (2019) A comparison of photocatalytic reforming reactions of methanol and triethanolamine with Pd supported on titania and graphitic carbon nitride. Appl Catal B Environ 240:373–379Google Scholar
  21. Khaoulani S, Chaker H, Cadet C, Bychkov E, Cherif L, Bengueddach A, Fourmentin S (2015) Wastewater treatment by cyclodextrin polymers and noble metal/mesoporous TiO2 photocatalysts. C R Chim 18:23–31Google Scholar
  22. Kumar SG, Devi LG (2011) Review on modified TiO2 photocatalysis under UV/visible light: selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier transfer dynamics. J Phys Chem A 115:13211–13241Google Scholar
  23. Kurniawan TA, Yanyan L, Ouyang T, Albadarin AB, Walker G (2018) BaTiO3/TiO2 composite-assisted photocatalytic degradation for removal of acetaminophen from synthetic wastewater under UV–vis irradiation. Mater Sci Semicond Process 73:42–50Google Scholar
  24. Li X, Cui S, Wang D, Zhou Y, Zhou H, Hu Y, Liu J-G, Long Y, Wu W, Hua J, Tian H (2014) New organic donor-acceptor-π-acceptor sensitizers for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible-light irradiation. Chemsuschem 7:2879–2888Google Scholar
  25. Liu G, Li X, Zhao J, Horikoshi S, Hidaka H (2000) Photooxidation mechanism of dye alizarin red in TiO2 dispersions under visible illumination: an experimental and theoretical examination. J Mol Catal A Chem 153:221–229Google Scholar
  26. Liu H, Li G, Qu J, Liu H (2007) Degradation of azo dye acid orange 7 in water by Fe0/granular activated carbon system in the presence of ultrasound. J Hazard Mater 144:180–186Google Scholar
  27. Maeda K, Domen K (2007) New non-oxide photocatalysts designed for overall water splitting under visible light. J Phys Chem C 111:7851–7861Google Scholar
  28. Massoudinejad M, Ghaderpoori M, Azari MR (2015) The removal of COD and color from textile industry by chlorine hypochlorite. Int J Adv Sci Technol 76:35–42Google Scholar
  29. Massoudinejad M, Rasoulzadeh H, Ghaderpoori M (2019) Magnetic chitosan nanocomposite: fabrication, properties, and optimization for adsorptive removal of crystal violet from aqueous solutions. Carbohydr Polym 206:844–853Google Scholar
  30. Melián EP, López CR, Santiago DE, Quesada-Cabrera R, Méndez JAO, Rodríguez JMD, Díaz OG (2016) Study of the photocatalytic activity of Pt-modified commercial TiO2 for hydrogen production in the presence of common organic sacrificial agents. Appl Catal A Gen 518:189–197Google Scholar
  31. Mohammadi AA, Alinejad A, Kamarehie B, Javan S, Ghaderpoury A, Ahmadpour M, Ghaderpoori M (2017) Metal-organic framework Uio-66 for adsorption of methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1959–1968Google Scholar
  32. Montini T, Gombac V, Sordelli L, Delgado JJ, Chen X, Adami G, Fornasiero P (2011) Nanostructured Cu/TiO2 photocatalysts for H2 production from ethanol and glycerol aqueous solutions. ChemCatChem 3:574–577Google Scholar
  33. Nasirian M, Mehrvar M (2018) Photocatalytic degradation of aqueous Methyl Orange using nitrogen-doped TiO2 photocatalyst prepared by novel method of ultraviolet-assisted thermal synthesis. J Environ Sci 66:81–93Google Scholar
  34. Nasirian M, Lin YP, Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Mehrvar M (2018) Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide using non-metal doping methods under visible light: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:2009–2032Google Scholar
  35. Ni M, Leung MKH, Leung DYC, Sumathy K (2007) A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using for hydrogen production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11:401–425Google Scholar
  36. Ong CB, Mohammad AW, Rohani R, Ba-Abbad MM, Hairom NHH (2016) Solar photocatalytic degradation of hazardous Congo red using low-temperature synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Process Saf Environ Protect 104:549–557Google Scholar
  37. Palominos R, Freer J, Mondaca MA, Mansilla HD (2008) Evidence for hole participation during the photocatalytic oxidation of the antibiotic flumequine. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 193:139–145Google Scholar
  38. Patsoura A, Kondarides DI, Verykios XE (2007) Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants with simultaneous production of hydrogen. Catal Today 124:94–102Google Scholar
  39. Rathnasamy R, Santhanam M, Alagan V (2018) Anchoring of ZnO nanoparticles on exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic decolorization of methyl red dye. Mater Sci Semicond Process 85:59–67Google Scholar
  40. Ribao P, Rivero MJ, Ortiz I (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic activity using GO/TiO2 catalyst for the removal of DCA solutions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:34893–34902Google Scholar
  41. Saikia L, Bhuyan D, Saikia M, Malakar B, Dutta DK, Sengupta P (2015) Photocatalytic performance of ZnO nanomaterials for self sensitized degradation of malachite green dye under solar light. Appl Catal A Gen 490:42–49Google Scholar
  42. Seifhosseini M, Rashidi F, Rezaei M, Rahimpour N (2018) Bias potential role in degradation of methyl orange in photocatalytic process. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 360:196–203Google Scholar
  43. Sen B, Kuzu S, Demir E, Akocak S, Sen F (2017) Monodisperse palladium–nickel alloy nanoparticles assembled on graphene oxide with the high catalytic activity and reusability in the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine–borane. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:23276–23283Google Scholar
  44. Shiragami T, Tomo T, Matsumoto T, Yasuda M (2013) Structural dependence of alcoholic sacrificial agents on TiO2-photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 86:382–389Google Scholar
  45. Su E-C, Huang B-S, Liu C-C, Wey M-Y (2015) Photocatalytic conversion of simulated EDTA wastewater to hydrogen by pH-resistant Pt/TiO2–activated carbon photocatalysts. Renew Energy 75:266–271Google Scholar
  46. Su CX-H, Low LW, Teng TT, Wong YS (2016a) Combination and hybridisation of treatments in dye wastewater treatment: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3618–3631Google Scholar
  47. Su E-C, Huang B-S, Wey M-Y (2016b) Sustainable hydrogen production from electroplating wastewater over a solar light responsive photocatalyst. RSC Adv 6:71273–71281Google Scholar
  48. Su E-C, Huang B-S, Wey M-Y (2017a) Green route for hydrogen evolution from real electroplating waste liquids induced by a solar light responsive photocatalyst. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:2146–2153Google Scholar
  49. Su E-C, Yeh J-M, Huang B-S, Lee J-T, Wey M-Y (2017b) Design of a solar light-responsive metal oxide/CdS/SrTiO3 catalyst with enhanced charge separation for hydrogen evolution. Sol Energy 147:240–247Google Scholar
  50. Su E-C, Huang B-S, Lee J-T, Wey M-Y (2018a) Excellent dispersion and charge separation of SrTiO3–TiO2 nanotube derived from a two-step hydrothermal process for facilitating hydrogen evolution under sunlight irradiation. Sol Energy 159:751–759Google Scholar
  51. Su E-C, Lee J-T, Gong Y-J, Huang B-S, Wey M-Y (2018b) Photocatalytic conversion of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dissolved in real electroplating wastewater to hydrogen in a solar light-responsive system. Water Sci Technol 77:2851–2857Google Scholar
  52. Tahir MB, Nabi G, Rafique M, Khalid NR (2017) Nanostructured-based WO3 photocatalysts: recent development, activity enhancement, perspectives and applications for wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:2519–2542Google Scholar
  53. Tanabe T, Miyazawa W, Gunji T, Hashimoto M, Kaneko S, Nozawa T, Miyauchi M, Matsumoto F (2016) Site-selective deposition of binary Pt–Pb alloy nanoparticles on TiO2 nanorod for acetic acid oxidative decomposition. J Catal 340:276–286Google Scholar
  54. Tran PD, Batabyal SK, Pramana SS, Barber J, Wong LH, Loo SCJ (2012) A cuprous oxide-reduced graphene oxide (Cu2O–rGO) composite photocatalyst for hydrogen generation: employing rGO as an electron acceptor to enhance the photocatalytic activity and stability of Cu2O. Nanoscale 4:3875–3878Google Scholar
  55. Wang J, Yang P, Cao B, Zhao J, Zhu Z (2015) Photocatalytic carbon–carbon bond formation with concurrent hydrogen evolution on the Pt/TiO2 nanotube. Appl Surf Sci 325:86–90Google Scholar
  56. Wang F, Yang H, Zhang Y (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic performance of CuBi2O4 particles decorated with Ag nanowires. Mater Sci Semicond Process 73:58–66Google Scholar
  57. Wei Z, Li Y, Luo S, Liu C, Meng D, Ding M, Zeng G (2014) Hierarchical heterostructure of CdS nanoparticles sensitized electrospun TiO2 nanofibers with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Sep Purif Technol 122:60–66Google Scholar
  58. Xiang Q, Yu J, Wong PK (2011) Quantitative characterization of hydroxyl radicals produced by various photocatalysts. J Colloid Interface Sci 357:163–167Google Scholar
  59. Yaseen DA, Scholz M (2018) Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:1193–1226Google Scholar
  60. Zhang X, Wang C, Yu C, Teng B, He Y, Zhao L, Fan M (2018) Application of Ag/AgBr/GdVO4 composite photocatalyst in wastewater treatment. J Environ Sci 63:68–75Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichungTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Green Energy and Environment Research LaboratoriesIndustrial Technology Research InstituteHsinchuTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations