Advertisement

Radioactivity and radiological impact of industrial raw materials in Korea

  • N. M. HassanEmail author
  • J. S. Chae
Original Paper
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Natural radionuclides of 226Ra (238U), 232Th, and 40K in raw materials used in building and cosmetic materials produced in Korea were measured using a γ-ray spectrometer (HPGe). The radionuclide concentrations ranged from 0.06 ± 0.01 to 4.13 ± 0.21 Bq g−1 for 226Ra, 0.08 ± 0.01 to 33.6 ± 1.9 Bq g−1 for 232Th, and from minimum detectable activity to 4.06 ± 0.36 Bq g−1 for 40K, respectively. The 226Ra and 232Th contents in a majority of samples were higher than the exemption level recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency of 1 Bq g−1 for 226Ra and 232Th and 10 Bq g−1 for 40K; however, the 40K content in all the selected raw materials was lower than this level. Moreover, it was observed that these materials were richer in thorium than uranium, which implies that these raw materials contain variable amounts of monazite ore. Radiological indices of radium equivalent, gamma-index, absorbed radiation, and equivalent gamma-doses were also calculated. The results indicate a potential radiation hazard, which highlight the necessity of radiation-regulation and routine monitoring.

Keywords

Gamma-spectrometer Radionuclides Radiation-regulation Raw Building and cosmetic materials Korea 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety. The authors would like to thank all the members of the Department of Natural Radiation Safety for their support during this project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afifi EM, Shahr El-Din AM, Aglan RF, Borai EH, Abo-Aly MM (2017) Baseline evaluation for natural radioactivity level and radiological hazardous parameters associated with processing of high grade monazite. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 89:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruzzi L, Baroni M, Mazzotti G, Mele R, Righi S (2000) Radioactivity in raw materials and end products in the Italian ceramics industry. J Environ Radioact 47(2):171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang BU, Koh SM, Kim YJ, Seo JS, Yoon YY, Row JW, Lee DM (2008) Nationwide survey on the natural radionuclides in industrial raw minerals in South Korea. J Environ Radioact 99(3):455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EC (European Commission) (1999) Radiation protection 112, radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials. Directorate-General Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil ProtectionGoogle Scholar
  5. EC (European Commission) (2000) Radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials, radiation protection 112. Directorate-general Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, Luxembourg, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamed MM, Hilal MA, Borai EH (2016) Chemical distribution of hazardous natural radionuclides during monazite mineral processing. J Environ Radioact 162–163:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hassan NM, Ishikawa T, Hosoda M, Sorimachi A, Tokonami S, Fukushi M, Sahoo SK (2010) Assessment of the natural radioactivity using two techniques for the measurement of radionuclide concentration in building materials used in Japan. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 283:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hassan NM, Mansour NA, Fayez-Hassan M, Fares S (2017) Assessment of radiation hazards due to exposure to radionuclides in marble and ceramic commonly used as decorative building materials in Egypt. Indoor Built Environ 26(3):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2003) Extent of environmental contamination by Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) and Technological Options for Mitigation. IAEA Technical Report Series No. 419, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  10. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2004) Application of the concepts of exclusion, exemption and clearance. Safety standards series RS-G-1.7, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  11. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Authority) (2014) Safety standards for protecting people and the environment, radiation protection and safety of radiation sources. General Safety Requirements No. GSR Part 3. IAEA, Vienna, Austria, p 128Google Scholar
  12. ICRP (International Commission of Radiological Protection) (2007) The 2007 recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP, Oxford; ICRP Publication 103Google Scholar
  13. Iwaoka K, Tagami K, Yonehara H (2009) Measurement of natural radioactive nuclide concentrations in various metal ores used as industrial raw materials in Japan and estimation of dose received by workers handling them. J Environ Radioact 100:993–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwaoka K, Yajima K, Suzuki T, Yonehara T, Hosoda M, Tokonami S, Kanda R (2017) Investigation of natural radioactivity in monazite processing plant in Japan. Health Phys 113(3):220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jang M, Chung KH, Lim JM, Ji YY, Kim CJ, Kang MJ (2017) Analysis and evaluation for consumer goods containing NORM in Korea. Appl Radiat Isot 126:293–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kovler K (2009) Radiological constraints of using building materials and industrial by-products in construction. Constr Build Mater 23:246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larijani C, Schwendner P, Cockell C, Ivanov P, Russell B, Aitken-Smith P, Pearce AK, Regan PH (2017) Destructive and nondestructive measurements of NORM in monazite-rich sands of Brazil. Radiat Phys Chem 140:180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (2014) Act on protective action guidelines against radiation in the natural environment. Act No. 12664Google Scholar
  19. UNSCEAR (1993) United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation, sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. UNSCEAR (2008) United Nations Scientific Committee on the effect of atomic radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, exposures of the public and workers from various sources of radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annex-b, p. 233. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Natural Radiation SafetyKorea Institute of Nuclear SafetyDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations