Advertisement

Application of response surface method for removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using foam fractionation process

  • S. Piri
  • N. MehranbodEmail author
  • M. Moussavi
  • S. M. Mirsoleimani-azizi
Original Paper
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Discharge of heavy metals into the environment by wastewater from production and application processes is nowadays getting more and more serious due to the rapid development of such processes. Produced water during oil production and wastewater form metal plating and ore dressing are few examples to mention. In this research, removal of chromium ions from aqueous solutions has been studied by foam fractionation process using cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide as surfactant. Effect of processing time, gas flow rate, initial surfactant concentration, and initial pH on removal efficiency has been investigated. Preliminary screening tests were performed, and initial surfactant concentration and processing time were recognized as the variables with a significant effect on removal efficiency. Response surface methodology based on central composite design as a design of experiment method was employed to design experiments to study the effect of important variables more precisely. Five levels for each significant variable were considered and design of experiment. An accurate correlative model is developed for the estimation of removal efficiency under different operating conditions in foam fractionation process with a maximum relative error of 1.674%. Four sets of validation tests were also conducted, and the results of validation tests were shown to be in accordance with those obtained on tests dictated by design of experiment. Optimum operating conditions were found to be with an initial surfactant concentration of 175 ppm and 45 min of processing time that yielded 97.74% removal of Cr(VI) from a solution of 10 ppm initial concentration.

Keywords

Central composite design Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide Foam fractionation process Removal of Cr(VI) Response surface methodology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

References

  1. Amooey AA, Ghasemi S, Mirsoleimani-azizi SM, Gholaminezhad Z, Chaichi MJ (2014) Removal of Diazinon from aqueous solution by electrocoagulation process using aluminum electrodes. Korean J Chem Eng 31:1016–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arulmozhi M, Begum KMS, Anantharaman N (2007) Foam separation of copper(II) from aqueous solutions. J Environ Res Dev 2:217–225Google Scholar
  3. Brito F, Ascanio J, Mateo S, Hernández C, Araujo L, Gili P, Martín-Zarza P, Domínguez S, Mederos A (1997) Equilibria of chromate(VI) species in acid medium and ab initio studies of these species. Polyhedron 16:3835–3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheballah K, Sahmoune A, Messaoudi K, Drouiche N, Lounici H (2015) Simultaneous removal of hexavalent chromium and COD from industrial wastewater by bipolar electrocoagulation. Chem Eng Process 96:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen H-R, Chen C-C, Reddy AS, Chen C-Y, Li WR, Tseng M-J, Liu H-T, Pan W, Maity JP, Atla SB (2011) Removal of mercury by foam fractionation using surfactin, a biosurfactant. Int J Mol Sci 12:8245–8258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng Q, Wang C, Doudrick K, Chan CK (2015) Hexavalent chromium removal using metal oxide photocatalysts. Appl Catal B 176:740–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Czitrom V (1999) One-factor-at-a-time versus designed experiments. Am Stat 53:126–131Google Scholar
  8. Dekhil A, Hannachi Y, Ghorbel A, Boubaker T (2011) Removal of lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solutions using dried marine green macroalga (Caulerpa racemosa). Int J Environ Res 5:725–732Google Scholar
  9. Gerken BM, Nicolai A, Linke D, Zorn H, Berger RG, Parlar H (2006) Effective enrichment and recovery of laccase C using continuous foam fractionation. Sep Purif Technol 49:291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghosh R, Sahu A, Pushpavanam S (2019) Removal of trace hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by ion foam fractionation. J Hazard Mater 367:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heidmann I, Calmano W (2008) Removal of Cr(VI) from model wastewaters by electrocoagulation with Fe electrodes. Sep Purif Technol 61:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang C, Wu Z, Li R, Liu Q (2011) Technology of protein separation from whey wastewater by two-stage foam separation. Biochem Eng J 55:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kinoshita T, Ishigaki Y, Shibata N, Yamaguchi K, Akita S, Kitagawa S, Kondou H, Nii S (2011) Selective recovery of gallium with continuous counter-current foam separation and its application to leaching solution of zinc refinery residues. Sep Purif Technol 78:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kongsricharoern N, Polprasert C (1996) Chromium removal by a bipolar electro-chemical precipitation process. Water Sci Technol 34:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lazarova V, Levine B, Sack J, Cirelli G, Jeffrey P, Muntau H, Salgot M, Brissaud F (2001) Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in Europe and Mediterranean countries. Water Sci Technol 43:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Y, Wu Z, Zhao B, Li L, Li R (2013) Enhancing defoaming using the foam breaker with perforated plates for promoting the application of foam fractionation. Sep Purif Technol 120:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu K, Zhang X-L, Zhao Y-L, Wu Z-L (2010) Removal of color from textile dyeing wastewater by foam separation. J Hazard Mater 182:928–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu J, Li Y, Zhang S, Sun Y (2015) Removal of trace Cd2+ from aqueous solution by foam fractionation. J Hazard Mater 286:466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahmoud MR, Lazaridis NK (2015) Simultaneous removal of nickel (II) and chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions and simulated wastewaters by foam separation. Sep Sci Technol 50:1421–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matsuoka K, Miura H, Karima S, Taketaka C, Ouno S, Moroi Y (2018) Removal of alkali metal ions from aqueous solution by foam separation method. J Mol Liq 263:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mella B, Glanert AC, Gutterres M (2015) Removal of chromium from tanning wastewater and its reuse. Process Saf Environ Prot 95:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merz J, Burghoff B, Zorn H, Schembecker G (2011) Continuous foam fractionation: performance as a function of operating variables. Sep Purif Technol 82:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller JN, Miller JC (2005) Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry. Pearson Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Mirsoleimani-azizi SM, Amooey AA, Ghasemi S, Salkhordeh-panbechouleh S (2015) Modeling the removal of endosulfan from aqueous solution by electrocoagulation process using artificial neural network (ANN). Ind Eng Chem Res 54:9844–9849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mirsoleimani-azizi SM, Setoodeh P, Zeinali S, Rahimpour MR (2018) Tetracycline antibiotic removal from aqueous solutions by MOF-5: adsorption isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Environ Chem Eng 6:6118–6130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishra S, Bharagava RN (2016) Toxic and genotoxic effects of hexavalent chromium in environment and its bioremediation strategies. J Environ Sci Health Part C 34:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  28. Moussavi M, Javidnejad M (2007) Separation of Hg(II) by foam fractionation in the acidic range: effect of complexation. J Hazard Mater 144:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pagana A, Sklari S, Kikkinides E, Zaspalis V (2008) Microporous ceramic membrane technology for the removal of arsenic and chromium ions from contaminated water. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 110:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peykar S, Anvaripour B, Motavassel M, Jadidi N (2013) Mercury removal from wastewater by batch foam fractionation. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 4:3198–3203Google Scholar
  31. Qu Y-H, Zeng G-M, Huang J-H, Xu K, Fang Y-Y, Li X, Liu H-L (2008) Recovery of surfactant SDS and Cd2+ from permeate in MEUF using a continuous foam fractionator. J Hazard Mater 155:32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qu Y, Zhang X, Xu J, Zhang W, Guo Y (2014) Removal of hexavalent chromium from wastewater using magnetotactic bacteria. Sep Purif Technol 136:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rengaraj S, Yeon K-H, Moon S-H (2001) Removal of chromium from water and wastewater by ion exchange resins. J Hazard Mater 87:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roosta M, Ghaedi M, Daneshfar A, Sahraei R, Asghari A (2014) Optimization of the ultrasonic assisted removal of methylene blue by gold nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon using experimental design methodology. Ultrason Sonochem 21:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sereshti H, Farahani MV, Baghdadi M (2016) Trace determination of chromium (VI) in environmental water samples using innovative thermally reduced graphene (TRG) modified SiO2 adsorbent for solid phase extraction and UV–vis spectrophotometry. Talanta 146:662–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shadmehr J, Mirsoleimani-azizi S, Zeinali S, Setoodeh P (2018) Electrocoagulation process for propiconazole elimination from wastewater: experimental design for correlative modeling and optimization. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1891-8 Google Scholar
  37. Shah M, Pathak K (2010) Development and statistical optimization of solid lipid nanoparticles of simvastatin by using 23 full-factorial design. AAPS PharmSciTech 11:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stevenson P (2007) Hydrodynamic theory of rising foam. Miner Eng 20:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tadakamalla K, Marathe K (2011) Hydrodynamic study and optimization strategy for the surfactant recovery from aqueous solutions. Desalination 266:98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Venkateswaran P, Palanivelu K (2004) Solvent extraction of hexavalent chromium with tetrabutyl ammonium bromide from aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol 40:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan J, Wu Z, Zhao Y, Jiang C (2011) Separation of tea saponin by two-stage foam fractionation. Sep Purif Technol 80:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang Q-W, Wu Z-L, Zhao Y-L, Wang Y, Li R (2011) Enhancing foam drainage using foam fractionation column with spiral internal for separation of sodium dodecyl sulfate. J Hazard Mater 192:1900–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yuan X, Meng Y, Zeng G, Fang Y, Shi J (2008) Evaluation of tea-derived biosurfactant on removing heavy metal ions from dilute wastewater by ion flotation. Colloids Surf A 317:256–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Piri
    • 1
  • N. Mehranbod
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Moussavi
    • 1
  • S. M. Mirsoleimani-azizi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical and Petroleum EngineeringShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations