Advertisement

Characterization of functional electrospun polymeric nanofiber membranes

  • N. A. AliEmail author
  • E. A. Hussein
Original Paper
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

EVOH/biochar membranes (diameters 900–1000 nm) were fabricated through lab-made electrospinning technique. SEM, FTIR and DSC were used to characterize the nanofiber membranes. Results revealed that 1.5% biochar loading is the best loading ratio for two reasons: ease of production and the enhancement of filtration. Beyond this loading value, agglomeration hinders the growth of nanofiber matrix. Mechanical properties showed higher tensile modulus for membranes of 1.5% biochar. Efficiency of filtration was verified by using particles with variable size ranging from 30 to 2000 nm. Removal efficiency up to 94.5% of 300 nm particles was achieved. The cost-effectiveness and durability were demonstrated by the reusability, i.e., the efficiency could be sustained up to 93.79% in the first 6 cycles and reduced to 85% after 14 cycles, then reached 76.7% after 20 cycles. Such properties, combined with the economy, durable and easy to scale-up production confirmed the effective utilization of the membranes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

EVOH Electrospinning Biochar Filtration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to present truthful thanks to the Ministry of Higher Education (student Grant No 355254 and Applied Grants No. 213-740-05).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Research data for this article

Due to continuous nature of the study, required raw data remain confidential and would not be shared.

References

  1. Basile A, Charcosset C (eds) (2016) Integrated membrane systems and processes. Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118739167
  2. Behazin E, Ogunsona E, Rodriguez-Uribe A, Mohanty AK, Misra M, Anyia AO (2015) Mechanical, chemical, and physical properties of wood and perennial grass biochars for possible composite application. BioResources 11:1334–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergshoef MM, Vancso GJ (1999) transparent nanocomposites with ultrathin, electrospun nylon-4,6 fiber reinforcement. Adv Mater 11:1362–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bui N, McCutcheon JR (2013) Hydrophilic nanofibers as new supports for thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. Eng Sci Technol 47:1761–1769Google Scholar
  5. Carrier M, Hardie AG, Uras Ü, Görgens J, Knoetze JH (2012) Production of char from vacuum pyrolysis of South-African sugar cane bagasse and its characterization as activated carbon and biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 96:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan KY, Van Zwietien L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochar as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 46:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cicala G, Tosto C, Latteri A, La Rosa AD, Blanco I, Elsabbagh A, Russo P, Ziegmann G (2017) Green composites based on blends of polypropylene with liquid wood reinforced with hemp fibers: thermomechanical properties and the effect of recycling cycles. Materials 10:998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Das O, Bhattacharyya D, Sarmah AK (2016) Sustainable eco-composites obtained from waste derived biochar: a consideration in performance properties, production costs, and environmental impact. Clean Prod 129:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doumer ME, Rigol A, Vidal M, Mangrich AS (2016) Removal of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn from aqueous solutions by biochars. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2684–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng C, Khulbe KC, Matsuura T, Tabe S, Ismail AF (2013) Preparation and characterization of electro-spun nanofiber membranes and their possible applications in water treatment. Sep Purif Technol 2102:118–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes JG, Correia DM, Botelho G, Padrão J, Dourado F, Ribeiro C, Lanceros-Méndez S, Sencadas V (2014) PHB-PEO electrospun fiber membranes containing chlorhexidine for drug delivery applications. Polym Test J 34:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han X, Huang Z, Huang C, Du Z, Wang H, Wang J, HE C, Wu Q (2012) Preparation and characterization of polyurethane inorganic particles nanofibers. Polym Compos 33:2045–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huanga ZM, Zhangb YZ, Kotakic M, Ramakrishna S (2003) A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:2223–2253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarusuwannapoom T, Hongrojjanawiwat W, Jitjaicham S, Wannatong L, Nithitanakul M, Pattamaprom C, Koombhongse P, Rangkupan R, Supaphol P (2005) Effect of solvents on electrospinnability of polystyrene solutions & morphological appearance of resulting electrospun polystyrene fibers. Eur Polym 41:409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ji L, Zhang X, Lett Mater (2008) Ultrafine polyacrylonitrile/silica composite fibers via electrospinning. Mater Lett 62:2161–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalderis D, Kotti MS, Méndez A, Gascó G (2014) Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of rice husk. Solid Earth 5:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaur S, Sundarrajan S, Rana D, Sridhar R, Gopal R, Matsuura T, Ramakrishna S (2014) The characterization of electrospun nanofibrous liquid filtration membranes. Mater Sci 49:6143–6159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenawy ER, Bowlin GL, Mansfield K, Layman J, Simpson DG, Sanders EH (2002) Release of tetracycline hydrochloride from electrospun poly(ethylene-co-vinylacetate, poly(lactic acid) and a blend. J Controll Release 81:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kloss S, Zehetner F, Dellantonio A, Hamid R, Ottner F, Liedtke V, Soja G (2011) Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. Environ Qual 41:990–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lei O, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures on soil physical and hydraulic properties. Soil Sediments 13:1561–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Xue X, Wang D, Lu Y, Wu Z, Zou H (2013) High performance filtration nanofibrous membranes based on hydrophilic poly (vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene) copolymer. Desalination 329:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu HQ, Hsieh YL (2002) Ultrafine fibrous cellulose membranes from electrospinning of cellulose acetate. Polym Sci B Polym Phys 40:2119–2129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Y, Park M, Shin HK, Pant B, Park SJ, Kim HY (2014) Preparation and characterization of chitosan-based nanofibers by ecofriendly electrospinning. Lett Mater 132:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallakpour S, Abdolmaleki A, Borandeh S (2014) l-Phenylalanine amino acid functionalized multi walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) as a reinforced filler for improving mechanical and morphological properties of poly (vinyl alcohol)/MWCNT composite. Prog Org Coat 77:1966–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matthews JA, Wnek GE, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL (2002) Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. Biomacromol 3:232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pirondi A, Bonora N, Steglich D, Brocks W, Hellmann D (2006) Simulation of failure under cyclic plastic loading by damage models. Int J Plast 22:2146–2170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo WE, Lim C, Ma Z (2005) An introduction to electrospinning and nanofibers. World Scientific Publishing Co., SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ren L, Ozisik R, Kotha SP (2014) Rapid and efficient fabrication of multilevel structured silica micro-/nanofibers by centrifugal jet spinning. Colloid Interface Sci 425:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salehi E, Madaeni SS, Rajabi L, Vatanpour V, Derakhshan AA, Zinadini S, Ghorabi S, Monfared HA (2012) Novel chitosan/poly (vinyl) alcohol thin adsorptive membranes modified with amino functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for Cu (II) removal from water: preparation, characterization, adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics. Sep Purif Technol 89:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schreuder-Gibson H, Gibson P, Senecal K, Sennett M, Walker J, Yeomans W, Ziegler D, Tsai PP (2002) Protective textile materials based on electrospun nanofibers. Adv Mater 34:44–55Google Scholar
  31. Shang S, Gan L, Yuen CWM (2015) The synthesis of graphene nano-ribbon and its reinforcing effect on poly (vinyl alcohol). Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 68:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shao J, Chen C, Wang Y, Chen X, Du C (2012) Early stage evolution of structure and nanoscale property of nanofibers in thermally induced phase separation process. React Funct Polym 72:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh N, Wang J, Ulbricht M, Wickramasinghe SR, Husson SM (2008) Surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization: a new method for preparation of polymeric membrane adsorbers. Membr Sci 309:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spitalsky Z, Tasis D, Papagelis K (2010) Carbon nanotube–polymer composites: chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties. Prog Polym Sci 35:357–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ulbricht M, Yang H (2005) Porous polypropylene membranes with different carboxyl polymer brush layers for reversible protein binding via surface-initiated graft copolymerization. Chem Mater 17:2622–2631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vaisanen Taneli, Das Oisik, Tomppo Laura (2017) New bio-based constituents for natural fiber-polymer composites. Clean Prod 149:582–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vanraes P, Willems G, Daels N, Van Hulle SWH, De Clerck K, Surmont P, Lynen F, Vandamme J, Van Durme J, Nikiforov A, Leys C (2015) Decomposition of atrazine traces in water by combination of non-thermal electrical discharge and adsorption on nanofiber membrane. Water Res 72:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang X, Drew X, Lee S-H, Senecal KJ, Kumar J, Samuelson LA (2002) Electrospun nanofibrous membranes for highly sensitive optical sensors. Nano Lett 2:1273–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoon K, Kim K, Wang X, Fang D, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2006) High flux ultrafiltration membranes based on electrospunnanofibrous PAN scaffolds and chitosan coating. Polymer 47:2434–2441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang Q, Yi W, Li Z, Wang L, Cai H (2018) Mechanical properties of rice husk biochar reinforced high density polyethylene composites. Polymers 10:286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zong X, Kim K, Fang D, Ran S, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2002) Structure and process relationship of electrospun bioabsorbable nanofiber membranes. Polymer 43:4403–4412CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering Physics and Mathematics, Faculty of EngineeringTanta UniversityTantaEgypt
  2. 2.Mechanical Department, Faculty of EngineeringTanta UniversityTantaEgypt
  3. 3.Center of Imaging and MicroscopyZwail City of Science and Technology6th of October City, GizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations