Modified activated carbon with silver–copper mixed oxides nanoparticles for removal of heavy metals from water

  • S. L. Bazana
  • Q. L. Shimabuku-Biadola
  • F. S. Arakawa
  • R. G. Gomes
  • E. S. Cossich
  • R. BergamascoEmail author
Original Paper


Gravitational filtration column experiments were carried out using granular activated carbon impregnated with metallic compounds for the removal of heavy metals from water. The material produced was characterised by textural characterisation: specific surface area Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, area of micropores (method t), volume and diameter of micropores (Horvath–Kawazoe method) and mesopores (Barret, Joyner and Halenda method); structural characterisation by X-ray diffraction; morphological characterisation by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The removal of the metals was analysed by atomic absorption spectrometry. Activated carbon (AC) and activated carbon modified with silver and copper metal compounds (ACAgCu) columns were monitored by physical–chemical parameters and efficiency of heavy metals removal. The removal of Pb from water ranged between 93 and 96%, reaching values in accordance with the acceptable standard for both AC and ACAgCu, with a residual of 9 µg L−1 and 5 µg L−1, respectively, at the end of the filtration. For Fe contaminant, the filtration column with ACAgCu was the best with a final residual of 0.18 mg L−1 and average removal of 74%. For AC, the residual was 0.42 mg L−1 with an average removal of 38%. Zn removal was low for AC and ACAgCu, with a final residual of 7.4 mg L−1 (mean removal of 39%) and 8.5 mg L−1 (mean removal of 19%), respectively.


Filtration Impregnation Potable water Removal of contaminants 



The authors wish to thank financial support from CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), Process Number 13978552.


  1. Aftab B, Khan SJ, Maqbool T, Hankins NP (2017) Heavy metals removal by osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) and their effect on sludge properties. Desalination 403:117–127. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater/prepared and published jointly by American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, 21st ed. APHA-AWWA-WEF, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Atanassova ID (1995) Adsorption and desorption of Cu at high equilibrium concentrations by soil and clay samples from Bulgaria. Environ Pollut 87:17–21. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaturvedi S, Dave PN (2012) Removal of iron for safe drinking water. Desalination 303:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi H-J, Lee S-M (2015) Heavy metal removal from acid mine drainage by calcined eggshell and microalgae hybrid system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:13404–13411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi JS, Koh I-U, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Song J (2013) Effects of excess dietary iron and fat on glucose and lipid metabolism. J Nutr Biochem 24:1634–1644. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi H-J, Yu S-W, Kim KH (2016) Efficient use of Mg-modified zeolite in the treatment of aqueous solution contaminated with heavy metal toxic ions. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 63:482–489. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colares CJG, Barbosa LS, Cardoso FF, Reis RC (2010) Tratamento de Efluente Industrial Farmacêutico por Adsorção com Carvão Ativado. Anais SNCMA, 1:1-6.
  9. Hajdu I et al (2012) Combined nano-membrane technology for removal of lead ions. J Membr Sci 409–410:44–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang X, Dong W, Wang G, Yang M, Tan L, Feng Y, Zhang X (2011) Synthesis of confined Ag nanowires within mesoporous silica via double solvent technique and their catalytic properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 359:40–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu Y, Yan J, Yuan D, Li Q, Wu X (2013) The study of lead removal from aqueous solution using an electrochemical method with a stainless steel net electrode coated with single wall carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 218:81–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Negm NA, Abd El Wahed MG, Hassan ARA, Abou Kana MTH (2018) Feasibility of metal adsorption using brown algae and fungi: effect of biosorbents structure on adsorption isotherm and kinetics. J Mol Liq 264:292–305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Patel KP, Tank SK, Patel KM, Patel P (2013) Removal of cadmium and zinc ions from aqueous solution by using two type of husks APCBEE. Procedia 5:141–144. Google Scholar
  14. Quantachrome (2002) Quantachrome Instruments—User Manual. Optimizing particle performance, Boynton Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  15. Salam MA, Al-Zhrani G, Kosa SA (2012) Simultaneous removal of copper(II), lead(II), zinc(II) and cadmium(II) from aqueous solutions by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Comptes Rendus Chimie 15:398–408. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salonen JT, Nyyssönen K, Korpela H, Tuomilehto J, Seppänen R, Salonen R (1992) High stored iron levels are associated with excess risk of myocardial infarction in eastern Finnish men. Circulation 86:803–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sawyer CN (2003) Chemistry for environmental engineering and science. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Shao Y et al (2018) Green synthesis of sodium alginate-silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. Int J Biol Macromol 111:1281–1292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shek T-H, Ma A, Lee VKC, McKay G (2009) Kinetics of zinc ions removal from effluents using ion exchange resin. Chem Eng J 146:63–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shimabuku QL, Arakawa FS, Fernandes Silva M, Ferri Coldebella P, Ueda-Nakamura T, Fagundes-Klen MR, Bergamasco R (2016) Water treatment with exceptional virus inactivation using activated carbon modified with silver (Ag) and copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles Environmental technology. Environ Technol. Google Scholar
  21. Sing K, Everett D, Haul R, Moscou L, Pierotti R, Rouquerol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Physical and biophysical chemistry division commission on colloid and surface chemistry including catalysis. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Syed B, Nagendra Prasad MN, Satish S (2016) Synthesis and characterization of silver nanobactericides produced by Aneurinibacillus migulanus 141, a novel endophyte inhabiting Mimosa pudica L. Arab J Chem. Google Scholar
  23. WHO (2011) World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang J, Qiu K (2010) Preparation of activated carbons from walnut shells via vacuum chemical activation and their application for methylene blue removal. Chem Eng J 165:209–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ye M et al (2017) Removal of metals from lead-zinc mine tailings using bioleaching and followed by sulfide precipitation. Chemosphere 185:1189–1196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yin CY, Aroua MK, Daud WMAW (2007) Review of modifications of activated carbon for enhancing contaminant uptakes from aqueous solutions. Sep Purif Technol 52:403–415. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang S, Fu R, Wu D, Xu W, Ye Q, Chen Z (2004) Preparation and characterization of antibacterial silver-dispersed activated carbon aerogels. Carbon 42:3209–3216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. L. Bazana
    • 1
  • Q. L. Shimabuku-Biadola
    • 1
  • F. S. Arakawa
    • 1
  • R. G. Gomes
    • 1
  • E. S. Cossich
    • 1
  • R. Bergamasco
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringState University of MaringáMaringáBrazil

Personalised recommendations