Advertisement

Radiation shielding properties of some ceramic wasted samples

  • A. A. JawadEmail author
  • N. Demirkol
  • K. Gunoğlu
  • I. Akkurt
Original paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The radiation has great importance in human life; it enters into various fields of agricultural, industrial, medical and food sterilization, for example, in the medical field, X-ray is used to diagnose many cases of a disease. The exposure to radiation has great risks to human life and must be protected against it. There are several ways to protect the human body from radiation; one of these ways is shielding; in the present work, eight types of ceramic materials have been used as a shielding material and tested against gamma ray, each type of ceramic modified as glazed and unglazed. The radiation sources 137Cs and 60Co were used to calculate attenuation coefficients and half-value layers by gamma-ray spectrometer system with scintillation detector NaI(Tl). The obtained results show that the photon attenuation coefficient for all samples decreases with increasing energy, while half-value layers increase with increasing energy. The results of the study showed that glazed ceramics are better than unglazed in the attenuation of gamma radiation which makes their use of shielding better.

Keywords

Attenuation coefficients Ceramic Gamma-ray spectrometry Scintillation detector NaI(Tl) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author thanks all the participants in this research and all the institutions that supported it.

References

  1. Akkurt I, Elkhayat A (2013) The effect of barite proportion on neutron and gamma-ray shielding. Ann Nucl Energy 51:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkurt I, Basyigit C, Kilincarslan S (2004) The photon attenuation coefficients of barite, marble and limra. Ann Nucl Energy 31(5):577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkurt I, Basyigit C, Kilincarslan S, Mavi B (2005) The shielding of γ-rays by concretes produced with barite. Prog Nucl Energy 46(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akkurt I, Basyigit C, Mavi B, Kilincarslan S, Akkurt A (2006) Radiation shielding of concretes containing different aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 28(2):153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akkurt I, Mavi B, Kılıncarslan S, Basyigit C, Akyıldırım H (2009) Investigation of photon attenuation coefficient for pumice. Int J Phys Sci 4(10):588–591Google Scholar
  6. Akkurt I et al (2010) Photon attenuation coefficients of concrete includes barite in different rate. Ann Nucl Energy 37:910–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Sarray E, Akkurt I, Günoğlu K, Evcin A, Bezir NÇ (2017) Radiation shielding properties of some composite Panel. Acta Phys Polon A 132(3):490–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceramics (2017) Chemistry encyclopedia. http://www.chemistryexplained.com/Bo-e/Ceramics.html. Accessed Sept 2017
  9. El-Khayatt AM (2010) Radiation shielding of concretes containing different lime/silica ratios. Ann Nucl Energy 37(7):991–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Khayatt AM, Akkurt I (2013) Photon interaction, energy absorption and neutron removal cross section of concrete including marble. Ann Nucl Energy 60:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Günay O (2018) Determination of natural radioactivity and radiological effects in some soil samples. Eur J Sci Technol 12:9Google Scholar
  12. Günay O, Saç MM, Içhedef M, Taşköprü C (2018) Natural radioactivity analysis of soil samples from Ganos fault (GF). Int J Environ Sci Technol. Print ISSN: 1735-1472, Online ISSN, 1735-2630.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1793-9
  13. Najam LA, Hashim AK, Ahmed HA, Hassan IM (2016) 4: 33–39. http://www.scirp.org/journal/detection

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics DepartmentSuleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey
  2. 2.Degirmendere Ali Ozbay Vocational SchoolKocaeli UniversityIzmitTurkey
  3. 3.Technical Vocational SchoolIsparta Uygulamalı Bilimler UniversityIspartaTurkey

Personalised recommendations