Advertisement

A performance comparison of CCHE2D model with empirical methods to study sediment and erosion in gravel-bed rivers

  • A. Ayaseh
  • F. SalmasiEmail author
  • A. Hossienzade Dalir
  • H. Arvanaghi
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Depending on environmental conditions and hydrodynamic characteristics, erosion and sediment models always have higher marginal of errors. Thus, accurate and cost-effective models should be used for modeling erosion and sediment. Unlike empirical models, numerical models have more stability and less dependence on the variable parameters due to the uniformity of the conditions studied. Therefore, in this research a numerical CCHE2D (National Center for Computation Hydro-Science and Engineering 2D tool) model was used for erosion and sediment modeling of Beshar gravel-bed river (in Yasuj, Iran). Then, the results of the model were compared with several empirical formulas including Einstein, Vilkanov, Lane–Kalinske, Brooks, Englund and Bagnold based on statistical parameters. The results showed that CCHE2D and Einstein methods had the most efficiency in estimating suspended sediment load than other applied methods. Also, the best R2 (0.97–0.99) was observed for the results of CCHE2D, Einstein and Bagnold methods. Moreover, the number of errors in the range of 0.5 < r < 2 for CCHE2D and Einstein’s methods was more than other methods. The lowest root-mean-square error and mean absolute error (RMSE = 0.4–0.7, MAE = 0.4–0.5) were observed for these two models under different discharges, as well. Using CCHE2D model as an applied method for rivers with non-uniform sediment, non-equilibrium bed, unsteady flow and morphological changes is prioritized over other methods.

Keywords

Numerical and empirical methods Erosion and deposition Gravel-bed river River morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely appreciate the Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad Province Regional Water Company’s personnel, in particular the Office of Water Resources Basis Studies, which provided some basic information. The authors also wish to thank Sayed Hassan Fakhrahmad, Sohrab Ashkani and Sayed Baqer Mohamadi, who cooperated in field operations to measure the flow and sediment. The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

References

  1. Abebe A, Daniels J, McKean JW, Kapenga JA (2001) Statistics and data analysis, statistical computation lab (SCL), Western Michigan University. Kalamazoo, MI. http://www.stat.wmich.edu/s160/book
  2. Bagnold RA (1966) An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics. Us geological survey professional 422-1Google Scholar
  3. Brooks NH (1963) Calculation of suspended load discharge from velocity concentration parameters. In: Proceedings of federal interagency sedimentation conference, U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 970Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Reclamation (2006) Erosion and sedimentation manual. U.S Department of the Interior, Technical Service Center, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  5. De Smith MJ (2018) Statistical analysis handbook. The Winchelsea Press, Drumlin Security Ltd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vriend HJ (1977) A mathematical model of steady flow in curved shallow channels. J Hydraul Res IAHR 15(1):37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duboys MP (1879) Le Rhone et les Rivieres a Lit affouillable. Annales de ponts et chausses 18(5):141–195Google Scholar
  8. Einstein H (1950) The bed-load function in open channel flows, technical bulletin. No. 1026, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation ServiceGoogle Scholar
  9. Engel FL, Rhoads BL (2017) Velocity profiles and the structure of turbulence at the outer bank of a compound meander bend. Geomorphology 295:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelund F (1965) A criterion for the occurrence of suspended load. La Houille Blanche 8:7Google Scholar
  11. Formann E, Habersack HM (2007) Morphodynamic river processes and techniques for assessment of channel evolution in Alpine gravel bed rivers. Geomorphology 90(3–4):340–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graf WH, Blanckaert K (2002) Flow around bends in rivers. In: 2th international conference, new trends in water and environmental engineering for safety and life: eco-compatible solutions for aquatic environments, Capri (Italy), June 24–28, 2002. www.capri2002.com
  13. Gyr A, Hoyer K (2006) Sediment transport. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Habersack HM, Laronne JB (2002) Evaluation and improvement of bed load discharge formulas based on Helley-Smith sampling in an alpine gravel bed river. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 128(5):484–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hajigholizadeh M, Melesse AM, Fuentes HR (2018) Erosion and sediment transport modelling in shallow waters: a review on approaches, models and applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health 518:2–24Google Scholar
  16. Hassanzadeh U (1995) Investigation of erosion due to flood and its control. In: Water management conference, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran, pp 203–212Google Scholar
  17. Joshi S, Xu YJ (2017) Bed load and suspended load transport in the 140-km reach downstream of the Mississippi river avulsion to the Atchafalaya river. J Water 716:2–28Google Scholar
  18. Julien PY (2002) Rive mechanics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamanbedast AA, Nasrollahpour R, Mashal M (2013) Estimation of sediment transport in rivers using CCHE2D model (case Study: Karkheh River). Indian J Sci Technol 6(2):4112–4115Google Scholar
  20. Kästner K, Hoitink AJ, Torfs PJ, Vermeulen B, Ningsih NS, Pramulya M (2018) Prerequisites for accurate monitoring of river discharge based on fixed location velocity measurements. Water Res Res 54(2):1058–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim YS, Jang CL, Lee GH, Jung KS (2010) Investigation of flow characteristics of sharply curved channels by using CCHE2D model. J Korean Soc Hazard Mitig 10(5):125–133Google Scholar
  22. Lane EW, Kalinske AA (1941) Engineering calculation of suspended sediment. Trans Am Geophys Union 20(3):603–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopez Roal, Vericate Damia, Batalla RJ (2014) Evaluation of bed load transport formulae in large regulated gravel bed river, the lower Ebro (NE Iberian Peninsula). J Hydrol 510:164–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 1 18(8–9):761–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nassar MA (2011) Multi-parametric sensitivity analysis of CCHE2D for channel flow simulations in Nile River. J Hydro Environ Res 5(3):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Odgaard AJ (1984) Flow and bed topography in alluvial channel bend. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 110(4):521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parker G, Klingeman PC, McLean DG (1982) Bed load and size distribution in paved gravel-bed streams. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civ Eng 108:544–571Google Scholar
  28. Pourhosein M, Afzalimehr H, Singh VP, Dehghani AA (2015) Evaluation of bed load in a gravel-bed river. Int J Hydraul Eng 4(3):70–79Google Scholar
  29. Recking A (2013) Simple method for calculating reach-averaged bed-load transport. J Hydraul Eng 139:70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shah-Fairbank S, Julien Y (2015) Sediment load calculation from point measurements in sand-bed rivers. Int J Sediment Res 30:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ShahiriParsa A, Noori M, Heydari M, Rashidi M (2016) Floodplain zoning simulation by using HEC-RAS and CCHE2D models in the Sungai Maka river. Air, Soil and Water Res 9:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siyam AM, Mirghani M, El Zein S, Golla S, El-sayed SM (2005) Assessment of the current state of the Nile Basin reservoir sedimentation problems. In: NBCN-RE (Nile Basin capacity building network for river engineering), River Morphology, Research Cluster, Group- I ReportGoogle Scholar
  33. Son H, Lee J, Shin S, Moon C (2014) A study of sediment discharge and bed change characteristics of the local rivers in Korea. J Korean Geoenviron Soc 15(6):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toth B, Bodis E (2015) Estimation of suspended loads in the Danube River at GÖd (1668 River km), Hungary. J Hydrol 523:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ulke A, Beden N, Demir W, Menek N (2017) Numerical modeling of Samsun Mert river floods. J Eur Water 57:27–34Google Scholar
  36. Velikanov MA (1954) Gravitational theory of sediment transport. J Sci Soviet Union Geophy 4 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  37. Wu W (2001) CCHE2D Sediment Transport model-version 2.1. Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2001-3, School of Engineering, The University of MississippiGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu W, Viera DA (2002) One-dimensional Channel Network Model CCHE1D Version 3.0. Technical Manual, No. NCCHE-TR-2002-1, University of Mississippi, MS, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang CT (1984) Unit stream power equation for gravel. J Hydraul Eng 110(12):1783–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yasi M, Hamzepouri R, Yasi A (2013) Uncertainties in evaluation of sediment transport rates in typical coarse-bed rivers in Iran. J Water Sci Res 5(2):1–12Google Scholar
  41. Yasir SA, Alessandra C, Yasir AM, Seifeldin HA, Nigel GW (2014) Sediment balances in the Blue Nile River Basin. Int J Sediment Res 29:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yen H, Lu S, Feng Q, Wang R, Gao J, Brady DM, Sharifi A, Ahn J, Chen ST, Jeonh J, White MJ, Arnold JG (2017) Assessment of optional sediment transport functions via the complex watershed simulation model SWAT. J Water 76:1–19Google Scholar
  43. Zhang Y (2006a) CCHE2D-GUI-Graphical User’s Interface for NCCHE Model User’s Manual-Version 3.0. Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2006-02, School of Engineering, The University of MississippiGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang Y (2006b) CCHE2D-GUI-Graphical User’s Interface for NCCHE Model Quick Start Guide-Version 3.0. Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2006-03, School of Engineering, The University of MississippiGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Y (2009) CCHE-MESH 2D Structured Mesh Generator Version 3.x. Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2009-02, School of Engineering, The University of MississippiGoogle Scholar
  46. Zug M, Bellefleur D, Phan L, Scrivener O (1998) Sediment transport model in sewer networks—a new utilisation of the Velikanov model. Water Sci Technol 37(1):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Water EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations