Solid waste indicators and their implications for management practice

  • R. M. DeusEmail author
  • B. S. Bezerra
  • R. A. G. Battistelle


This study analyzed, through bibliometrics, state-of-the-art municipal solid waste indicators by consulting key articles on the subject from prominent authors and institutions. A content analysis was used to identify main indicators for municipal solid waste performance along with their corresponding sustainability dimensions and implications for the practice of its management. The environmental dimension is the most significant, followed by the economic and social dimensions, because it was found in more papers along time. Emphasis is given to the following indicators related to life cycle: energy indicators (also analyzed with emergy tools); landfill volume or percentage of waste sent to it; waste generation; and rates of composting, recycling, and incineration (may involve the rate of separation at the source). Indicators categorized by the economic dimension are primarily understood by their direct relation to the costs of municipal solid waste management systems, as implementation, maintenance, and operation. Concerning the social dimension, indicators are incipient and present in fewer studies. Among the indicators of this dimension, collection coverages and services (including quantity, types, and rates) are more frequently featured in publications. It is important to highlight that municipal solid waste indicators should be comparable across countries and cities and that international standards for quality management in companies must be established. These standards should be easy to interpret and apply and should include all dimensions of sustainability.


Municipal solid waste Performance indicators Decision-making support Sustainability Content analysis 



The authors thank the São Paulo State University (UNESP) for all supports.


  1. Abbasi M, Abduli MA, Omidvar B, Baghvand A (2013) Forecasting municipal solid waste generation by hybrid support vector machine and partial least square model. Int J Environ Res 7:27–38Google Scholar
  2. Abduli MA, Naghib A, Yonesi M, Akbari A (2011) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of solid waste management strategies in Tehran: landfill and composting plus landfill. Environ Monit Assess 178:487–498. Google Scholar
  3. Agostinho F, Almeida CMVB, Bonilla SH et al (2013) Urban solid waste plant treatment in Brazil: is there a net emergy yield on the recovered materials? Resour Conserv Recycl 73:143–155. Google Scholar
  4. Aliu IR, Adeyemi OE, Adebayo A (2014) Municipal household solid waste collection strategies in an African megacity: analysis of public private partnership performance in Lagos. Waste Manag Res 32:67–78. Google Scholar
  5. Antanasijević D, Pocajt V, Popović I et al (2013) The forecasting of municipal waste generation using artificial neural networks and sustainability indicators. Sustain Sci 8:37–46. Google Scholar
  6. Baud I, Grafakos S, Hordijk M, Post J (2001) Quality of life and alliances in solid waste management. Cities 18:3–12. Google Scholar
  7. Beccali G, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2001) Managing municipal solid waste—energetic and environmental comparison among different management options. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:243–249. Google Scholar
  8. Bovea MD, Ibáñez-Forés V, Gallardo A, Colomer-Mendoza FJ (2010) Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. A Spanish case study. Waste Manag 30:2383–2395. Google Scholar
  9. Brambilla Pisoni E, Raccanelli R, Dotelli G et al (2009) Accounting for transportation impacts in the environmental assessment of waste management plans. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:248–256. Google Scholar
  10. Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D et al (2007) Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80:571–583. Google Scholar
  11. Bringhenti JR, Zandonade E, Günther WMR (2011) Selection and validation of indicators for programs selective collection evaluation with social inclusion. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:876–884. Google Scholar
  12. Bueno G, Latasa I, Lozano PJ (2015) Comparative LCA of two approaches with different emphasis on energy or material recovery for a municipal solid waste management system in Gipuzkoa. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:449–459. Google Scholar
  13. Buenrostro O, Bocco G, Bernache G (2001) Urban solid waste generation and disposal in Mexico: a case study. Waste Manag Res 19:169–176. Google Scholar
  14. Cabezas H, Pawlowski C, Mayer A, Hoagland NT (2003) Sustainability: ecological, social, economic, technological, and systems perspectives. Clean Technol Environ Policy 5:167–180. Google Scholar
  15. Cadena E, Colón J, Sánchez A et al (2009) A methodology to determine gaseous emissions in a composting plant. Waste Manag 29:2799–2807. Google Scholar
  16. Chen TC, Lin CF (2008) Greenhouse gases emissions from waste management practices using Life Cycle Inventory model. J Hazard Mater 155:23–31. Google Scholar
  17. Cherubini F, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S (2008) Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy. Waste Manag 28:2552–2564. Google Scholar
  18. Cherubini F, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S (2009) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy 34:2116–2123. Google Scholar
  19. Chong YT, Teo KM, Tang LC (2016) A lifecycle-based sustainability indicator framework for waste-to-energy systems and a proposed metric of sustainability. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:797–809. Google Scholar
  20. Cifrian E, Coz A, Viguri J, Andrés A (2010) Indicators for valorisation of municipal solid waste and special waste. Waste Biomass Valorization 1:479–486. Google Scholar
  21. Cifrian E, Galan B, Andres A, Viguri JR (2012) Material flow indicators and carbon footprint for MSW management systems: analysis and application at regional level, Cantabria, Spain. Resour Conserv Recycl 68:54–66. Google Scholar
  22. Cifrian E, Andres A, Viguri JR (2013) Estimating monitoring indicators and the carbon footprint of municipal solid waste management in the region of Cantabria, Northern Spain. Waste Biomass Valorization 4:271–285. Google Scholar
  23. Cleary J (2009) Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. Environ Int 35:1256–1266. Google Scholar
  24. Consonni S, Viganò F (2011) Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: the potential for energy recovery. Waste Manag 31:2074–2084. Google Scholar
  25. Consonni S, Giugliano M, Grosso M (2005) Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste: Part B: emission and cost estimates. Waste Manag 25(2):137–148. Google Scholar
  26. Consonni S, Giugliano M, Massarutto A et al (2011) Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: project overview and main results. Waste Manag 31:2057–2065. Google Scholar
  27. Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Gastaldi M (2014) Strategic municipal solid waste management: a quantitative model for Italian regions. Energy Convers Manag 77:709–720. Google Scholar
  28. Dahlén L, Lagerkvist A (2010) Evaluation of recycling programmes in household waste collection systems. Waste Manag Res 28:577–586. Google Scholar
  29. Deus RM, Battistelle RAG, Silva GHR (2015) Resíduos sólidos no Brasil: contexto, lacunas e tendências. Eng Sanitária e Ambient 20:685–698. Google Scholar
  30. Deus RM, Battistelle RAG, Silva GHR (2017) Scenario evaluation for the management of household solid waste in small Brazilian municipalities. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:205–214. Google Scholar
  31. El Said S, Aghezzaf E-H (2017) A progress indicator-based assessment guide for integrated municipal solid-waste management systems. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. Google Scholar
  32. Elkington J (1994) Towards the suitable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36(2):90–100Google Scholar
  33. Eriksson O, Bisaillon M, Haraldsson M, Sundberg J (2014) Integrated waste management as a mean to promote renewable energy. Renew Energy 61:38–42. Google Scholar
  34. European Commission (2015) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on wasteGoogle Scholar
  35. Fehr M, Santos FC (2009) Landfill diversion: moving from sanitary to economic targets. Cities 26:280–286. Google Scholar
  36. Ferreira F, Avelino C, Bentes I et al (2017) Assessment strategies for municipal selective waste collection schemes. Waste Manag 59:3–13. Google Scholar
  37. Font Vivanco D, Puig Ventosa I, Gabarrell Durany X (2012) Building waste management core indicators through Spatial Material Flow Analysis: net recovery and transport intensity indexes. Waste Manag 32:2496–2510. Google Scholar
  38. Fragkou MC, Vicent T, Gabarrell X (2010) A general methodology for calculating the MSW management self-sufficiency indicator: application to the wider Barcelona area. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:390–399. Google Scholar
  39. Freitas L, Magrini A (2017) Waste management in industrial construction: investigating contributions from industrial ecology. Sustainability 9:1251. Google Scholar
  40. Fu H, Ho Y, Sui Y, Li Z (2010) A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993–2008. Waste Manag 30:2410–2417. Google Scholar
  41. Gamberini R, Del Buono D, Lolli F, Rimini B (2013) Municipal solid waste management: identification and analysis of engineering indexes representing demand and costs generated in virtuous Italian communities. Waste Manag 33:2532–2540. Google Scholar
  42. Gaur A, Kumar M (2017) A systematic approach to conducting review studies: an assessment of content analysis in 25 years of IB research. J World Bus 53:280–289. Google Scholar
  43. Ghanbari F, Amin Sharee F, Monavari M, Zaredar N (2012) A new method for environmental site assessment of urban solid waste landfills. Environ Monit Assess 184:1221–1230. Google Scholar
  44. Giugliano M, Cernuschi S, Grosso M, Rigamonti L (2011) Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life cycle assessment. Waste Manag 31:2092–2101. Google Scholar
  45. Gohlke O (2009) Efficiency of energy recovery from municipal solid waste and the resultant effect on the greenhouse gas balance. Waste Manag Res 27:894–906. Google Scholar
  46. Greene KL, Tonjes DJ (2014) Quantitative assessments of municipal waste management systems: using different indicators to compare and rank programs in New York State. Waste Manag 34:825–836. Google Scholar
  47. Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:220–232Google Scholar
  48. Gunamantha M, Sarto S (2012) Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste treatment to energy options: case study of KARTAMANTUL region, Yogyakarta. Renew Energy 41:277–284. Google Scholar
  49. Hasome H, Tachio K, Yokota I, Nitta Y (2001) Studies on the evaluation of municipal waste management systems. Waste Manag Res 19:2–11. Google Scholar
  50. Hellweg S, Doka G, Finnveden G, Hungerbühler K (2005) Assessing the eco-efficiency of end-of-pipe technologies with the environmental cost efficiency indicator. J Ind Ecol 9:189–203. Google Scholar
  51. Herva M, Roca E (2013) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Indic 25:77–84. Google Scholar
  52. Herva M, Neto B, Roca E (2014) Environmental assessment of the integrated municipal solid waste management system in Porto (Portugal). J Clean Prod 70:183–193. Google Scholar
  53. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P, Kennedy C (2013) Environment: waste production must peak this century. Nature 502:615–617. Google Scholar
  54. Huang Y-T, Pan T-C, Kao J-J (2011) Performance assessment for municipal solid waste collection in Taiwan. J Environ Manage 92:1277–1283. Google Scholar
  55. Hubbard G (2009) Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line. Bus Strategy Environ 18:177–191. Google Scholar
  56. Inglezakis VJ, Zorpas AA, Venetis C, Loizidou M, Moustakas K, Ardeleanu N, Ilieva L, Dvorsak S (2012) Municipal solid waste generation and economic growth analysis for the years 2000–2013 in Romania, Bulgaria. Slovenia and Greece. Fresenius Environ Bull 21(8b):2362–2367Google Scholar
  57. Kale SS, Kadam AK, Kumar S, Pawar NJ (2010) Evaluating pollution potential of leachate from landfill site, from the Pune metropolitan city and its impact on shallow basaltic aquifers. Environ Monit Assess 162:327–346. Google Scholar
  58. Katpatal Y, Rao B (2011) Decision support system for municipal solid waste management of nagpur urban area using high-resolution satellite data and geographic information system. J Urban Plan Dev 137:65–76. Google Scholar
  59. Kawai K, Tasaki T (2016) Revisiting estimates of municipal solid waste generation per capita and their reliability. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:1–13. Google Scholar
  60. Koushki PA, Al-Duaij U, Al-Ghimlas W (2004) Collection and transportation cost of household solid waste in Kuwait. Waste Manag 24:957–964Google Scholar
  61. Laner D, Crest M, Scharff H et al (2012) A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills. Waste Manag 32:498–512. Google Scholar
  62. Larsen PO, von Ins M (2010) The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index. Scientometrics 84:575–603. Google Scholar
  63. Lebersorger S, Beigl P (2011) Municipal solid waste generation in municipalities: quantifying impacts of household structure, commercial waste and domestic fuel. Waste Manag 31:1907–1915. Google Scholar
  64. Leme MMV, Rocha MH, Lora EES et al (2014) Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Brazil. Resour Conserv Recycl 87:8–20. Google Scholar
  65. Magrinho A, Didelet F, Semiao V (2006) Municipal solid waste disposal in Portugal. Waste Manag 26:1477–1489Google Scholar
  66. Marchettini N, Ridolfi R, Rustici M (2007) An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies. Waste Manag 27:562–571. Google Scholar
  67. McDougall FR, White PR, Franke M, Hindle P (2003) Integrated solid waste management—a life cycle inventory, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  68. Mendes P, Santos AC, Perna F, Ribau Teixeira M (2012) The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector. J Clean Prod 24:20–29. Google Scholar
  69. Mendes P, Santos AC, Nunes LM, Teixeira MR (2013) Evaluating municipal solid waste management performance in regions with strong seasonal variability. Ecol Indic 30:170–177. Google Scholar
  70. Menikpura S, Gheewala SH, Bonnet S (2012a) Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management systems with an application to a case study in Thailand. Waste Manag Res 30:708–719. Google Scholar
  71. Menikpura SNM, Gheewala SH, Bonnet S (2012b) Sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management in Sri Lanka: problems and prospects. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 14:181–192. Google Scholar
  72. Menikpura SNM, Gheewala SH, Bonnet S, Chiemchaisri C (2013) Evaluation of the effect of recycling on sustainability of municipal solid waste management in Thailand. Waste Biomass Valorization 4:237–257. Google Scholar
  73. Meza LA, Neto LB, Mello JCCBS, Gomes EG (2005) ISYDS—Integrated System for Decision Support (SIAD—Sistema Integrado de Apoio a Decisão): a software package for data envelopment analysis model. Pesqui Oper 25:493–503. Google Scholar
  74. Milutinović B, Stefanović G, Dassisti M et al (2014) Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model. Energy 74:190–201. Google Scholar
  75. Nessi S, Rigamonti L, Grosso M (2013) Discussion on methods to include prevention activities in waste management LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1358–1373. Google Scholar
  76. Ning SK, Bin Chang N, Hung MC (2013) Comparative streamlined life cycle assessment for two types of municipal solid waste incinerator. J Clean Prod 53:56–66. Google Scholar
  77. Polaz CNM, Teixeira BADN (2009) Indicadores de sustentabilidade para a gestão municipal de resíduos sólidos urbanos: um estudo para São Carlos (SP). Eng Sanit e Ambient 14:411–420. Google Scholar
  78. Pubule J, Blumberga A, Romagnoli F, Blumberga D (2015) Finding an optimal solution for biowaste management in the Baltic States. J Clean Prod 88:214–223. Google Scholar
  79. Rigamonti L, Grosso M, Sunseri MC (2009) Influence of assumptions about selection and recycling efficiencies on the LCA of integrated waste management systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:411–419. Google Scholar
  80. Rigamonti L, Grosso M, Giugliano M (2010) Life cycle assessment of sub-units composing a MSW management system. J Clean Prod 18:1652–1662. Google Scholar
  81. Rimaitytė I, Ruzgas T, Denafas G et al (2012) Application and evaluation of forecasting methods for municipal solid waste generation in an eastern-European city. Waste Manag Res 30:89–98. Google Scholar
  82. Sanjeevi V, Shahabudeen P (2015) Development of performance indicators for municipal solid waste management (PIMS): a review. Waste Manag Res 33:1052–1065. Google Scholar
  83. Sim NM, Wilson DC, Velis CA, Smith SR (2013) Waste management and recycling in the former Soviet Union: the City of Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic (Kyrgyzstan). Waste Manag Res 31:106–125. Google Scholar
  84. Singh UK, Kumar M, Chauhan R et al (2008) Assessment of the impact of landfill on groundwater quality: a case study of the Pirana site in western India. Environ Monit Assess 141:309–321. Google Scholar
  85. Stanisavljevic N, Brunner PH (2014) Combination of material flow analysis and substance flow analysis: a powerful approach for decision support in waste management. Waste Manag Res 32:733–744. Google Scholar
  86. Sufian MA, Bala BK (2007) Modeling of urban solid waste management system: the case of Dhaka city. Waste Manag 27:858–868. Google Scholar
  87. Suttibak S, Nitivattananon V (2008) Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:45–56. Google Scholar
  88. Teixeira CA, Avelino C, Ferreira F, Bentes I (2014a) Statistical analysis in MSW collection performance assessment. Waste Manag 34:1584–1594. Google Scholar
  89. Teixeira CA, Russo M, Matos C, Bentes I (2014b) Evaluation of operational, economic, and environmental performance of mixed and selective collection of municipal solid waste: porto case study. Waste Manag Res 32:1210–1218. Google Scholar
  90. Thorneloe SA, Weitz K, Jambeck J (2007) Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management. Waste Manag 27:1006–1020. Google Scholar
  91. United Nations Publications (2013) Guidelines for national waste management strategies: moving from challenges to opportunities. UN, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  92. van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2017) Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics 111:1053–1070. Google Scholar
  93. Vasconcelos SMR, Sorenson MM, Leta J (2009) A new input indicator for the assessment of science & technology research? Scientometrics 80:217–230. Google Scholar
  94. Weber RP (1990) Basic content analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilson DC, Rodic L, Scheinberg A et al (2012) Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Manag Res 30:237–254. Google Scholar
  96. Wilson DC, Rodic L, Cowing MJ et al (2015) “Wasteaware” benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities. Waste Manag 35:329–342. Google Scholar
  97. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. United Nation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  98. Zaccariello L, Cremiato R, Mastellone ML (2015) Evaluation of municipal solid waste management performance by material flow analysis: theoretical approach and case study. Waste Manag Res 33:871–885. Google Scholar
  99. Zaman AU (2014a) Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems. Ecol Indic 36:682–693Google Scholar
  100. Zaman AU (2014b) Measuring waste management performance using the ‘Zero Waste Index’: the case of Adelaide, Australia. J Clean Prod 66:407–419. Google Scholar
  101. Zaman AU, Lehmann S (2013) The zero waste index: a performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a ‘zero waste city’. J Clean Prod 50:123–132. Google Scholar
  102. Zhao W, Huppes G, van der Voet E (2011) Eco-efficiency for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation of municipal solid waste management: a case study of Tianjin, China. Waste Manag 31:1407–1415. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringSão Paulo State University (UNESP)BauruBrazil

Personalised recommendations