Advertisement

A conflict resolution method for waste load reallocation in river systems

  • K. Aghasian
  • A. MoridiEmail author
  • A. Mirbagheri
  • M. Abbaspour
Original Paper
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Various urban, industrial, and agricultural pollutions discharge more than river self-purification potential damages river ecosystem and increases water treatment costs. As different decision-makers and stakeholders are involved in the water quality management in river systems, a new bankruptcy form of the game theory is used to resolve the existing conflict of interests related to waste load allocation in downstream river. The river restoration potential can allocate to the conflicting parties with respect to their claims, by using bankruptcy solution methods. In this research, dischargeable pollution loads to Karun River are determined by pollution sources in various scenarios using bankruptcy methods for conflict resolution. For this purpose, the QUAL2 K river water quality simulation model is integrated with particle swarm optimization model, while various pollution loadings discharge policies have been determined based on bankruptcy method. This method was employed in one of the most pollutant rivers of southern Iran. As the salinity is one of the most important problems in the Karun River, the electrical conductivity is considered as water quality index. The results show that the proposed model for waste load allocation can reduce the salinity of the allocated water demands as well as the salinity discharged into the river. It should be noted that the suggested method does not necessarily minimize the total cost of wastewater treatment in the basin and might result in suboptimal allocations from an economic optimization method. But it should be the emphasis that this method can be used to develop practical solutions when utility information is not available or reliable, side payments are not feasible, and parties are not highly cooperative.

Keywords

Bankruptcy method Pollution load QUAL2 k River water quality management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

References

  1. Abed-Elmdoust A, Kerachian R (2012) Water resources allocation using a cooperative game with fuzzy payoffs and fuzzy coalitions. Water Resour Manag 26:3961–3976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansink E, Weikard H-P (2012) Sequential sharing rules for river sharing problems. Soc Choice Welfare 38:187–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arjoon D, Tilmant A, Herrmann M (2016) A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:2135–2150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapra SC, Pelletier GJ, Tao H (2008) QUAL2 K: a modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality, version 2.11: documentation and user’s manual. Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Tufts University, Medford, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Dehghan Manshadi H, Nikosokhan MH, Ardestani M (2015) A quantity-quality model for inter-basin water transfer system using game theoretic and virtual water approaches. Water Resour Manag 29:4573–4588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herrero C, Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Math Soc Sci 42:307–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kampas A, White B (2003) Selecting permit allocation rules for agricultural pollution control: a bargaining solution. Ecol Econ 47:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kerachian R, Karamouz M (2007) A stochastic conflict resolution model for water quality management in the reservoir–river systems. Adv Water Resour 30:866–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kerachian R, Fallahnia M, Bazargan-Lari MR, Mansoori A, Sedghi H (2010) A fuzzy game theoretic approach for groundwater resources management: application of Rubinstein Bargaining Theory. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(10):673–682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu D, Guo S, Shao Q, Jiang Y, Chen X (2014) Optimal allocation of water quality and waste load in the northwest Pearl River Delta, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk A 28(6):1525–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Madani K, Dinar A (2013) Exogenous regulatory institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: application to groundwater. Water Resour Econ 2–3:57–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2013.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Madani K, Zarezadeh M (2012) Bankruptcy methods for resolving water resources conflicts. In: World environmental and water resources congress 2012: crossing boundaries, pp 2247–2252Google Scholar
  14. Madani K, Zarezadeh M, Morid S (2014) A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:3055–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahjouri N, Bizhani-Manzar M (2013) Waste load allocation in rivers using fallback bargaining. Water Resour Manag 27:2125–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mianabadi H, Mostert E, Zarghami M, Giesen N (2014) A new bankruptcy method for conflict resolution in water resources allocation. J Environ Manage 144:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nikoo R, Kerachian R, Karimi A, Azadnia A, Jafarzadegan K (2013) Optimal water and waste load allocation in reservoir-river systems: a case study. Environ Earth Sci 71:4127–4142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sechi GM, Zucca R (2015) Water resource allocation in critical scarcity conditions: a bankruptcy game approach. Water Resour Manag 29:541–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheikhmohammady M, Madani K (2008) Sharing a multi-national resource through bankruptcy procedures. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Ahupua’aGoogle Scholar
  20. Tavakoli A, Nikoo MR, Kerachian R, Soltani M (2015) River water quality management considering agricultural return flows application of a non-linear two-stage stochastic fuzzy programming. Environ Monit Assess 187(4):158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Aghasian
    • 1
  • A. Moridi
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Mirbagheri
    • 3
  • M. Abbaspour
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environment and Energy, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Abbaspour Faculty of EngineeringShahid Beheshti UniversityHakimieh, TehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringKN Toosi, University of TechnologyTehranIran
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations