Advertisement

Remediation of manganese in mine impacted water by clay/manganese oxide hybrid adsorbent: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies

  • A. M. MuliwaEmail author
  • M. S. Onyango
  • A. Maity
  • A. Ochieng
Original Paper
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

The present study investigated the potential of clay/manganese oxide (CMnO) hybrid adsorbent for the removal of manganese (Mn2+) from mine impacted water (MIW). The adsorbent was characterised by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infra-red (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer–Emmet–Teller and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques. The equilibrium sorption capacity was depended on solution pH, MnO content of the clay, concentration and temperature. Isothermal adsorption highly inclined towards Freundlich isotherm model while thermodynamic parameters directed that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic in nature. The adsorption kinetics of Mn2+ onto CMnO fitted well with the pseudo-second-order model and the value of activation energy of adsorption (Ea) was 32 kJ/mol, inferring that the adsorption proceeded by activated chemisorption process. Both intra-particle and film diffusion mechanisms were found to be the sorption rate-controlling steps. Experiments with real MIW water revealed that CMnO exhibited high Mn2+ removal efficiency in the presence of interfering ions but anions removal posed a great challenge. The XPS, FT-IR and pH analyses suggested that oxidation, complexation and ion-exchange mechanisms were responsible for Mn2+ removal by CMnO. These findings demonstrate that CMnO could serve as an inexpensive adsorbent for polishing Mn2+ polluted water.

Keywords

Adsorption Clay Hybrid Manganese Mine impacted water Oxide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Rand Water South Africa through Rand Water Chair in Water Utilisation. Authors would like to thank the Institute for NanoEngineering Research laboratory, Tshwane University of Technology for material characterisation.

Supplementary material

13762_2018_1817_MOESM1_ESM.docx (345 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 344 kb)

References

  1. Adekola FA, Hodonou DSS, Adegoke HI (2014) Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of biosorption of iron and manganese from aqueous medium using rice husk ash. Appl Water Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0227-1 Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal A, Sahu KK (2006) Kinetic and isotherm studies of cadmium adsorption on manganese nodule residue. J Hazard Mater B 137:915–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad MA, Puad NAA, Bello OS (2014) Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies of synthetic dye removal using pomegranate peel activated carbon prepared by microwave-induced KOH activation. Water Res Ind 6:18–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akpomie KG, Dawodu FA, Adebowale KO (2015) Mechanism on the sorption of heavy metals from binary-solution by a low cost montmorillonite and its desorption potential. Alex Eng J 54:757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Shahrani SS (2014) Treatment of wastewater contaminated with cobalt using Saudi activated bentonite. Alex Eng J 53:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anirudhan S, Suchithra PS (2010) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic modeling for the adsorption of heavy metals onto chemically modified hydrotalcite. Indian J Chem Technol 17:247–259Google Scholar
  7. Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baseri H, Tizro S (2017) Treatment of nickel ions from contaminated water by magnetite based nanocomposite adsorbents: effects of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters and modeling with Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:465–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharyya KG, Gupta SS (2008) Adsorption of a few heavy metals on natural and modified kaolinite and montmorillonite: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 140:114–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coston JA, Fuller CC, Davis JA (1995) Pb2+ and Zn2+ adsorption by a natural aluminum- and iron-bearir.g surface coating on an aquifer sand. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:3535–3547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cui L et al (2015) Removal of mercury and methylene blue from aqueous solution by xanthate functionalized magnetic graphene oxide: sorption kinetic and uptake mechanism. J Colloid Interface Sci 439:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolati SH, Fereidoon A, Sabet AR (2013) Hail impact damage behaviors of glass fiber reinforced epoxy filled with nanoclay. J Compos Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998313484950 Google Scholar
  13. Draper NR, Smith H (1998) Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Khaiary MI (2008) Least-squares regression of adsorption equilibrium data: comparing the options. J Hazard Mater 158:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farghali AA, Bahgat M, Allah AE, Khedr MH (2013) Adsorption of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions using copper oxide nanostructures. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 2:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modelling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gitari WM (2014) Attenuation of metal species in acidic solutions using bentoniteclay: implications for acid mine drainage remediation. Toxicol Environ Chem 96:201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goher ME, Hassan AM, Abdel-Moniem IA, Fahmy AH, Abdo MH, El-sayed SM (2015) Removal of aluminum, iron and manganese ions from industrial wastes using granular activated carbon and Amberlite IR-120H. Egypt J Aquat Res 41:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han R, Zou W, Zhang Z, Shi J, Yang J (2006) Removal of copper(II) and lead(II) from aqueous solution by manganese oxide coated sand I. Characterization and kinetic study. J Hazard Mater B137:384–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho YS, McKay G (1998) The kinetics of sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. Can J Chem Eng 76:822–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hossain MA, Ngo HH, Guo W (2013) Introductory of microsoft excel SOLVER function—spreadsheet method for isotherm and kinetics modelling of metals biosorption in water and wastewater. J Water Sustain 3:223–237Google Scholar
  22. Hussain CM, Kharisov B (2013) Advanced environmental analysis: application of nanomaterials. Royal Soc Chem, London.  https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782623625 Google Scholar
  23. Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2005) Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ 338:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katsoyiannis IA, Zouboulis AI (2004) Biological treatment of Mn(II) and Fe(II) containing groundwater: kinetic considerations and product characterization. Water Res 38:1922–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kebabi B, Terchi S, Bougherara H, Reinert L, Duclaux L (2017) Removal of manganese (II) by edge site adsorption on raw and milled vermiculites. Appl Clay Sci 139:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kera NH, Bhaumik MB, Ballav N, Pillay K, Ray SS, Maity A (2016) Selective removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by polypyrrole/2,5-diaminobenzene sulfonic acid composite. J Colloid Interface Sci 476:144–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladeira ACQ, Gonçalves CR (2008) Uranium recovery and manganese removal from acid mine drainage. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 111:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Z, Imaizumi S, Katsumi T, Inui T, Tang X, Tang Q (2010) Manganese removal from aqueous solution using a thermally decomposed leaf. J Hazard Mater 177:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luo C, Wei R, Guo D, Zhang S, Yan S (2013) Adsorption behavior of MnO2 functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 225:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma SB, Ahn KY, Lee ES, Oh KH, Kim KB (2007) Synthesis and characterization of manganese dioxide spontaneously coated on carbon nanotubes. Carbon 45:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Madejova J, Komadel P (2001) Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays: infrared methods. Clays Clay Miner 49:410–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahmoud AM, Ibrahim FA, Shaban SA, Youssef NA (2015) Adsorption of heavy metal ion from aqueous solution by nickel oxide nano catalyst prepared by different methods. Egypt J Pet 24:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Masindi V, Gitari MW, Tutu H, DeBeer M (2015) Efficiency of ball milled South African bentonite clay for remediation of acid mine drainage. J Water Process Eng 8:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meira SMM, Jardim AI, Brandelli A (2015) Adsorption of nisin and pediocin on nanoclays. Food Chem 188:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mirzaei AA, Shaterian HR, Kaykhaii M (2005) The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of surface composition of aged mixed copper manganese oxide catalysts. Appl Surf Sci 239:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mobasherpour I, Salahi E, Ebrahimi M (2014) Thermodynamics and kinetics of adsorption of Cu(II) from aqueous solutions onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Saudi Chem Soc 18:792–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moghaddam HK, Pakizeh M (2015) Experimental study on mercury ions removal from aqueous solution by MnO2/CNTs nanocomposite adsorbent. J Ind Eng Chem 21:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Motulsky H, Christopoulos A (2004) Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Nassar MM (2006) Adsorption of Fe+3 and Mn+2 from ground water onto maize cobs using batch adsorber and fixed bed column. Sep Sci Technol 41:943–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nguyen LH, Nguyen DT, La TH, Phan KX, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen HN (2007) Effects of nanoclay on the properties of cardanol-modified-resol–epoxy–novolac composite material. J Appl Polym Sci 103:3238–3242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Day PA, Chisholm-Brause CJ, Towle SN, Parks GA, Brown GE (1996) X-ray absorption spectroscopy of Co(II) sorption complexes on quartz (a-SiO2) and rutile (TiO2). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:2515–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Omri A, Benzina M (2012) Removal of manganese(II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon derived a new precursor: Ziziphus spina-christi seeds. Alex Eng J 51(4):343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pahadea V, Sharma AK (2015) Manganese removal by low cost adsorbent from synthetic wastewater—a review. Int J Eng Res 4:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parashar K, Ballav N, Debnath S, Pillay K, Maity A (2016) Hydrous TiO2@polypyrrole hybrid nanocomposite as an efficient selective scavenger for the defluoridation of drinking water. RSC Adv 6:99482–99495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Qiu H, Lv L, Pan B, Zhang QJ, Zhang WM, Zhang QX (2009) Critical review in adsorption kinetics models. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 10(5):716–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Qomi MH, Eisazadeh H, Hosseini M, Namaghi HA (2014) Manganese removal from aqueous media using polyaniline nanocomposite coated on wood sawdust. Synth Met 194:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rajic N, Stojakovic D, Jevtic S, Logar NZ, Kovac J, Kaucic V (2009) Removal of aqueous manganese using the natural zeolitic tuff from the Vranjska Banja deposit in Serbia. J Hazard Mater 172:1450–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rumsby P et al (2014) Speciation of manganese in drinking water, UC9780. WRc PLC, SwindonGoogle Scholar
  49. Saha P, Chowdhury S (2011) Insight into adsorption thermodynamics. In: Tadashi M (ed) Thermodynamics. InTech. http://www.intechopen.com/books/thermodynamics/insight-into-adsorption-thermodynamics
  50. Sahu MK, Mandal S, Yadav LS, Soumya Dash SS, Kishore R (2015) Equilibrium and kinetic studies of Cd(II) ion adsorption from aqueous solution by activated red mud. Desalin Water Treat 57:14251–14265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sani HA, Ahmad MB, Hussein MZ, Ibrahim NA, Musa A, Saleh TA (2017) Nanocomposite of ZnO with montmorillonite for removal of lead and copper ions from aqueous solutions. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sari A, Tuzen M (2008) Biosorption of cadmium (II) from aqueous solution by red algae (Ceramium virgatum): equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Hazard Mater 157:448–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sicupira DC, Silva TT, Ladeira ACQ, Mansur MB (2015) Adsorption of manganese from acid mine drainage effluents using bone char: continuous fixed bed column and batch desorption studies. Brazil J Chem Eng 32:577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Silva AM, Cunha EC, Silva FD, Leao VA (2012) Treatment of high-manganese mine water with limestone and sodium carbonate. J Clean Prod 29–30:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Song J, Zhang R, Li K, Li B, Tang C (2015) Adsorption of copper and zinc on activated carbon prepared from Typha latifolia L. CLEAN Soil Air Water 43:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Srinivasan R (2011) Advances in application of natural clay and its composites in removal of biological, organic, and inorganic contaminants from drinking water. Adv Mater Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/872531 Google Scholar
  57. Talebzadeh F, Sobhanardakani S, Zandipak R (2017) Effective adsorption of As(V) and V(V) ions from water samples using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine functionalized sodium dodecyl sulfate-coated magnetite nanoparticles. Sep Sci Technol 52:622–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tang J, Mu B, Wang W, Zheng M, Wang A (2016) Fabrication of manganese dioxide/carbon/attapulgite composites derived from spent bleaching earth for adsorption of Pb(II) and brilliant green. RSC Adv 6:36534–36543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Benschoten JE, Reed BE, Matsumoto MR, McGarvey PJ (1994) Metal removal by soil washing for an iron oxide coated sandy soil. Water Environ Res 66:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang SG, Gong WX, Liu XW, Yao YW, Gao BY, Yue QY (2007) Removal of lead(II) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto manganese oxide-coated carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 58:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. WHO (2011) Manganese in drinking water, vol WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/104/Rev/1. WHO Press, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  62. Worch E (2012) Adsorption technology in water treatment, fundamentals, processes, and modeling. De Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yan H et al (2014) Rapid removal and separation of iron(II) and manganese(II) from micropolluted water using magnetic graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9871–9880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yavuz O, Altunkaynak Y, Guzel F (2003) Removal of copper, nickel, cobalt and manganese from aqueous solution by kaolinite. Water Res 37:948–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ye J et al (2015) Interaction between phosphate and acid-activated neutralized red mud during adsorption process. Appl Surf Sci 356:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zahar MSM, Kusin FM, Muhammad SN (2015) Adsorption of manganese in aqueous solution by steel slag. Procedia Environ Sci 30:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhu CS, Wang LP, Chen W (2009) Removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solution by agricultural by-product: peanut hull. J Hazard Mater 168:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zou W, Han R, Chen Z, Shi J, Hongmin L (2006) Characterization and properties of manganese oxide coated zeolite as adsorbent for removal of copper(II) and lead(II) ions from solution. J Chem Eng Data 51:534–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemicalMetallurgical and Materials Engineering, Tshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.DST/CSIR National Centre for Nanostructured MaterialsCouncil for Scientific and Industrial ResearchPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Centre for Renewable Energy and WaterVaal University of TechnologyVanderbijlparkSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations