Advertisement

An integrated life cycle inventory and artificial neural network model for mining air pollution management

  • Z. Asif
  • Z. ChenEmail author
  • Z. H. Zhu
Original Paper

Abstract

It is necessary to trade off environmental impact and mining performance, preferably using an integrated life cycle modeling approach, while quantifying the air emissions. An integrated framework comprises of a life cycle inventory, and artificial neural network model for mining (LCAMM) is developed and applied to the real case study of an open-pit gold mine. This study aims to develop the air pollution inventory using inverse matrix method and estimation of midpoint impact assessment using defined characterization methodologies. Furthermore, this paper explores the feasibility of back-propagation artificial neural networking model to develop the carbon footprints analysis for the mine in terms of CO2 equivalent by constructing different scenarios. The inventory result shows that TSP (49.6%), PM10 (20%), PM2.5 (14.7%), N2O (7.1%), CO (6.1%), SO2 (1.3%), HCN (0.6%), CH4 (0.4%), CaO (0.2%) and VOCs (0.06%) are responsible for the total environmental load in this gold mining. Subsequently, particulate matter formation (kg PM10 eq.) significantly contributes to the midpoint impact in contrast to the other environmental impacts, mainly because of hauling, handling of ore, milling/grinding, drilling and stockpiling. The study reveals that average 13,992.25–13,993.75 tons of CO2 equivalent is produced as the carbon footprints for this mine. This study confirms that LCAMM framework can serve the basis for further analysis of pollutant’s dispersion and assist decision makers to select an appropriate remedial technique in the mining industry.

Keywords

Air pollutants Mining Life cycle assessment Artificial neural network Carbon footprint Inventory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The authors would like to thank Mr. Jean-Marc Lacoste, the President of the Croinor Gold Inc., for being an industrial partner providing Canadian context mining process references.

Supplementary material

13762_2018_1813_MOESM1_ESM.docx (733 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 732 kb)

References

  1. Albuquerque Filho FS, de Madeiro F, Fernandes SMM et al (2013) Time-series forecasting of pollutant concentration levels using particle swarm optimization and artificial neural networks. Quim Nova 36:783–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asif Z, Chen Z (2016) Environmental management in North American mining sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awuah-Offei K, Adekpedjou A (2011) Application of life cycle assessment in the mining industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:82–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0246-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA. An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan KY, Jian L (2013) Identification of significant factors for air pollution levels using a neural network based knowledge discovery system. Neurocomputing 99:564–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng S, Li L, Chen D, Li J (2012) A neural network based ensemble approach for improving the accuracy of meteorological fields used for regional air quality modeling. J Environ Manag 112:404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper JS (2003) The computational structure of life cycle assessment, by Reinout Heijungs and Sangwon Suh, Dordrecht. J Ind Ecol 7:131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper CD, Alley FC (2002) Air pollution control: a design approach. Waveland Press, Long GroveGoogle Scholar
  9. Dieterle FJ (2003) Multianalyte quantifications by means of integration of artificial neural networks, genetic algorithms and chemometrics for time-resolved analytical data. Doctoral Dissertation, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Durucan S, Korre A, Munoz-Melendez G (2006) Mining life cycle modelling: a cradle-to-gate approach to environmental management in the minerals industry. J Clean Prod 14:1057–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan R et al (2006) The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gabi (2016) http://www.gabi-software.com/canada/index. Assessed 20 July 2017
  13. Gobakis K, Kolokotsa D, Synnefa A et al (2011) Development of a model for urban heat island prediction using neural network techniques. Sustain Cities Soc 1:104–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heijungs R, Suh S (2006) Reformulation of matrix-based LCI: from product balance to process balance. J Clean Prod 14:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingwersen WW (2011) Emergy as a life cycle impact assessment indicator. J Ind Ecol 15:550–567.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00333.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lal B, Tripathy SS (2012) Prediction of dust concentration in open cast coal mine using artificial neural network. Atmos Pollut Res 3:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu W (2006) Study on the advanced technique of environmental assessment based on life cycle assessment using matrix method. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  18. Metso (2016) http://www.metso.com/industries/mining/services-mining. Accessed 16 June 2017
  19. Nazari S, Gharabaghi M (2015) Investigation on life cycle assessment of lead and zinc production. Int J Min Geo-Eng 49:245–252Google Scholar
  20. Norgate T, Haque N (2010) Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations. J Clean Prod 18:266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Norgate T, Haque N (2012) Using life cycle assessment to evaluate some environmental impacts of gold production. J Clean Prod 29–30:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norgate T, Jahanshahi S (2011) Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas footprints of nickel laterite processing. Miner Eng 24:698–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Northey S, Haque N, Mudd G (2013) Using sustainability reporting to assess the environmental footprint of copper mining. J Clean Prod 40:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuss P, Eckelman MJ (2014) Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. PLoS ONE 9:e101298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. OpenLCA (2016) http://www.openlca.org. Assessed 17 Aug 2017
  26. Patra AK, Gautam S, Majumdar S, Kumar P (2016) Prediction of particulate matter concentration profile in an opencast copper mine in India using an artificial neural network model. Air Qual Atmos Heal 9:697–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reid C, Becaert V, Aubertin M et al (2009) Life cycle assessment of mine tailings management in Canada. J Clean Prod 17:471–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy S, Adhikari GR, Renaldy TA, Jha AK (2011) Development of multiple regression and neural network models for assessment of blasting dust at a large surface coal mine. J Environ Sci Technol 4:284–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2010) Time series analysis and its applications: with R examples. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. SimaPro 7 (2015) http://www.pre-sustainability.com. Assessed 29 July 2017
  31. Tecer LH (2007) Prediction of SO2 and PM concentrations in a coastal mining area (Zonguldak, Turkey) using an artificial neural network. Polish J Environ Stud 16:633–638Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering (BCEE)Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations