Magnetic activated carbon as a sustainable solution for removal of micropollutants from water

  • M. Alizadeh FardEmail author
  • B. Barkdoll
Original Paper


A new hydrothermal method was developed to prepare magnetic activated carbon nanocomposite to remove six micropollutants (Triclosan, Bisphenol-A, Tonalide, Metolachlor, Ketoprofen and Estriol) from water. These emerging pollutants are mainly coming from anthropogenic sources. Results indicated that the synthesized magnetic activated carbon was successfully used as a separable adsorbent for removing the micropollutants from water. Adsorption results were modeled by Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms, which showed a better fit of data to the Langmuir model. The adsorbent showed good adsorption performance in which Bisphenol-A and Tonalide were the most effectively removed compounds, with 96 and 93% removal using 0.35 mg of the adsorbent within 40 min in a 50-mL sealed glass vial, respectively. Sedimentation studies were performed to compare the settleability of the adsorbent with powdered activated carbon revealing the superiority of the adsorbent. Thermodynamics of the adsorption of the micropollutants onto the magnetic activated carbon showed the adsorption process was endothermic and spontaneous. Adsorbent regeneration studies were performed with methanol, ethanol, HCl, NaOH and H2O2 in five regeneration cycles. Methanol treatment ensured the highest level of restoration. Overall, the adsorbent can be used as a sustainable treatment to remove studied micropollutants from aqueous solutions.


Micropollutant removal Magnetic activated carbon Magnetic separation Adsorbent regeneration 



The authors want to thank the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan Technological University for financial support as graduate teaching assistantship.

Supplementary material

13762_2018_1809_MOESM1_ESM.docx (227 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 227 kb)


  1. Aghdam E, Aminzadeh B, Baghdadi M, Alizadeh Fard M (2015) Removal of BTEX from aqueous solutions by paper mill sludge-based activated carbon. J Adv Chem 11(1):3416–3432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ai L, Huang H, Chen Z, Wei X, Jiang J (2010) Activated carbon/CoFe2O4 composites: facile synthesis, magnetic performance and their potential application for the removal of malachite green from water. Chem Eng J 156(2):243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alizadeh Fard M, Barkdoll B (2018) Effects of oxalate and persulfate addition to Electrofenton and Electrofenton-Fenton processes for oxidation of Ketoprofen: determination of reactive species and mass balance analysis. Electrochim Acta 265:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alizadeh Fard M, Aminzadeh B, Taheri M, Farhadi S, Maghsoodi M (2013a) MBR excess sludge reduction by combination of electrocoagulation and Fenton oxidation processes. Sep Purif Technol 120:378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alizadeh Fard M, Aminzadeh B, Vahidi H (2013b) Degradation of petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons using TiO2 nanopowder film. Environ Technol 34(9):1183–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alizadeh Fard M, Torabian A, Bidhendi GRN, Aminzadeh B (2013c) Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation of petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons using nanoscale zero-valent iron. J Environ Eng 139(7):966–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alizadeh Fard M, Vosoogh A, Barkdoll B, Aminzadeh B (2017) Using polymer coated nanoparticles for adsorption of micropollutants from water. Colloids Surf A 531:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alsbaiee A, Smith BJ, Xiao L, Ling Y, Helbling DE, Dichtel WR (2016) Rapid removal of organic micropollutants from water by a porous β-cyclodextrin polymer. Nature 529(7585):190–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Amin MT, Alazba AA, Manzoor U (2014) A review of removal of pollutants from water/wastewater using different types of nanomaterials. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baghdadi M, Ghaffari E, Aminzadeh B (2016) Removal of carbamazepine from municipal wastewater effluent using optimally synthesized magnetic activated carbon: adsorption and sedimentation kinetic studies. J Environ Chem Eng 4(3):3309–3321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bäuerlein PS, ter Laak TL, Hofman-Caris RCHM, de Voogt P, Droge STJ (2012) Removal of charged micropollutants from water by ion-exchange polymers—effects of competing electrolytes. Water Res 46(16):5009–5018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bini RA, Marques RFC, Santos FJ, Chaker JA, Jafelicci M Jr (2012) Synthesis and functionalization of magnetite nanoparticles with different amino-functional alkoxysilanes. J Magn Magn Mater 324(4):534–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM (2005) Removal of cosmetic ingredients and pharmaceuticals in sewage primary treatment. Water Res 39(19):4790–4796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng M, Zeng G, Huang D, Lai C, Xu P, Zhang C, Liu Y (2016) Hydroxyl radicals based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for remediation of soils contaminated with organic compounds: a review. Chem Eng J 284:582–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dada A, Olalekan A, Olatunya A, Dada O (2012) Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherms studies of equilibrium sorption of Zn2+ unto phosphoric acid modified rice husk. IOSR J Appl Chem 3(1):38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fard MA, Barkdoll B (2017) Using recyclable magnetic carbon nanotube to remove micropollutants from aqueous solutions. J Mol Liq 249:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farhadi S, Aminzadeh B, Torabian A, Khatibikamal V, Alizadeh Fard M (2012) Comparison of COD removal from pharmaceutical wastewater by electrocoagulation, photoelectrocoagulation, peroxi-electrocoagulation and peroxi-photoelectrocoagulation processes. J Hazard Mater 219–220:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farkaš A, Rožić M, Barbarić-Mikočević Ž (2005) Ammonium exchange in leakage waters of waste dumps using natural zeolite from the Krapina region, Croatia. J Hazard Mater 117(1):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filippa MA, Melo GM, Gasull EI (2016) Ketoprofen solubility in organic solvents and aqueous cosolvent systems: interactions and thermodynamic parameters of solvation. J Pharm Chem Biol 3(4):440–453Google Scholar
  20. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156(1):2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao H, Zhao S, Cheng X, Wang X, Zheng L (2013) Removal of anionic azo dyes from aqueous solution using magnetic polymer multi-wall carbon nanotube nanocomposite as adsorbent. Chem Eng J 223:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guillemot M, Mijoin J, Mignard S, Magnoux P (2007) Adsorption of tetrachloroethylene on cationic X and Y zeolites: influence of cation nature and of water vapor. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(13):4614–4620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hijosa-Valsero M, Matamoros V, Sidrach-Cardona R, Martín-Villacorta J, Becares E, Bayona JM (2010) Comprehensive assessment of the design configuration of constructed wetlands for the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products from urban wastewaters. Water Res 44(12):3669–3678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34(5):451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. James CP, Germain E, Judd S (2014) Micropollutant removal by advanced oxidation of microfiltered secondary effluent for water reuse. Sep Purif Technol 127:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones O, Voulvoulis N, Lester J (2002) Aquatic environmental assessment of the top 25 English prescription pharmaceuticals. Water Res 36(20):5013–5022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim H-C, Yu M-J, Han I (2006) Multi-method study of the characteristic chemical nature of aquatic humic substances isolated from the Han River, Korea. Appl Geochem 21(7):1226–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kümmerer K (2008) Pharmaceuticals in the environment: sources, fate, effects and risks. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee HY, Lim NH, Seo JA, Yuk SH, Kwak BK, Khang G, Lee HB, Cho SH (2006) Preparation and magnetic resonance imaging effect of polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 79(1):142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee S, Lee J-S, Song M-K, Ryu J-C, An B, Lee C-G, Park C, Lee S-H, Choi J-W (2015) Effective regeneration of an adsorbent for the removal of organic contaminants developed based on UV radiation and toxicity evaluation. React Funct Polym 95:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li D-P, Zhang Y-R, Zhao X-X, Zhao B-X (2013) Magnetic nanoparticles coated by aminoguanidine for selective adsorption of acid dyes from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 232:425–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matamoros V, García J, Bayona JM (2008) Organic micropollutant removal in a full-scale surface flow constructed wetland fed with secondary effluent. Water Res 42(3):653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagy ZM, Molnar M, Fekete-Kertesz I, Molnar-Perl I, Fenyvesi E, Gruiz K (2014) Removal of emerging micropollutants from water using cyclodextrin. Sci Total Environ 485–486:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nguyen TD, Phan NH, Do MH, Ngo KT (2011) Magnetic Fe2MO4 (M: Fe, Mn) activated carbons: fabrication, characterization and heterogeneous Fenton oxidation of methyl orange. J Hazard Mater 185(2):653–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Notthakun S, Crittenden JC, Hand DW, Perram DL, Mullins ME (1993) Regeneration of adsorbents using heterogeneous advanced oxidation. J Environ Eng 119(4):695–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Obare SO, Meyer GJ (2004) Nanostructured materials for environmental remediation of organic contaminants in water. J Environ Sci Health, Part A 39(10):2549–2582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pignatello JJ, Oliveros E, MacKay A (2006) Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 36(1):1–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qi W, Singer H, Berg M, Müller B, Pernet-Coudrier B, Liu H, Qu J (2015) Elimination of polar micropollutants and anthropogenic markers by wastewater treatment in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 119:1054–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Santiago-Morales J, Gómez MJ, Herrera S, Fernández-Alba AR, García-Calvo E, Rosal R (2012) Oxidative and photochemical processes for the removal of galaxolide and tonalide from wastewater. Water Res 46(14):4435–4447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwarzenbach RP, Escher BI, Fenner K, Hofstetter TB, Johnson CA, Von Gunten U, Wehrli B (2006) The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 313(5790):1072–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith BC (1998) Infrared spectral interpretation: a systematic approach. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  42. Song Y, Wang R, Rong R, Ding J, Liu J, Li R, Liu Z, Li H, Wang X, Zhang J (2011) Synthesis of well‐dispersed aqueous‐phase magnetite nanoparticles and their metabolism as an MRI contrast agent for the reticuloendothelial system. Eur J Inorg Chem 22:3303–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsai S-C, Juang K-W (2000) Comparison of linear and nonlinear forms of isotherm models for strontium sorption on a sodium bentonite. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 243(3):741–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations