Advertisement

Remote sensing-based land surface change identification and prediction in the Aral Sea bed, Central Asia

  • H. Shen
  • J. AbuduwailiEmail author
  • L. Ma
  • A. Samat
Original Paper

Abstract

The human-induced desiccation of the Aral Sea has generated large amounts of salt dust and has been posing a great threat to local ecological environment and human health. Monitoring its land cover changes is essential to obtaining information about the desertification process and dynamics of potential salt/sand dust source. To this end, long-term Landsat imagery was applied for the land use/cover change analysis based on support vector machine approach. The land cover distribution of the study area for 1977, 1987, 1996, 2006 and 2015 was mapped. In addition, the Markov–cellular automata integrated approach was used to predict the land cover change in 2015 and project changes in 2025 by extrapolating current trends. The classification results revealed that water surface of the Aral Sea shrunk by more than 66%, leading to the dramatic expanding of the salt soil and bare area. Change detection analysis indicated a serious land degradation trend as well as a major land cover evolution mode in the Aral Kum that could predict shifts in dust composition. The Markov–cellular automata technique was successful in predicting land cover distribution in 2015, and the projected land cover for 2025 revealed more desertification of the landscape with potential expansion in the salt soils and bare area. It is worth noting that the vegetation cover of the region represented an obvious increase in recent years that may be a good signal of ecological recovery.

Keywords

Remote sensing Aral Sea Markov–cellular automata Land use and land cover Support vector machine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the USGS for providing the Landsat data. And special thanks go to the editor’s and three reviewers’ precious comments and suggestions for the manuscript. This research was conducted under the support of the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA2006030102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1603242, 41471098, 41601440).

References

  1. Abd El-Kawy OR, Rød JK, Ismail HA, Suliman AS (2011) Land use and land cover change detection in the western Nile delta of Egypt using remote sensing data. Appl Geogr 31:483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajocco S, De Angelis A, Salvati L (2012) A satellite-based green index as a proxy for vegetation cover quality in a Mediterranean region. Ecol Ind 23:578–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker WL (1989) A review of models of landscape change. Landsc Ecol 2:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekchanov M, Ringler C, Bhaduri A, Jeuland M (2016) Optimizing irrigation efficiency improvements in the Aral Sea Basin. Water Resour Econ 13:30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boschetti L, Stehman SV, Roy DP (2016) A stratified random sampling design in space and time for regional to global scale burned area product validation. Remote Sens Environ 186:465–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breckle SW, Wucherer W (2012) Climatic conditions in the Aralkum. In: Breckle S-W, Wucherer W, Dimeyeva LA, Ogar NP (eds) Aralkum—a man-made desert: the desiccated floor of the Aral Sea (Central Asia). Springer, Berlin, pp 49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Congalton RG, Green K (2009) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Milton ParkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cretaux J-F, Letolle R, Bergé-Nguyen M (2013) History of Aral Sea level variability and current scientific debates. Glob Planet Change Part A 110:99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Beurs KM, Henebry GM, Owsley BC, Sokolik I (2015) Using multiple remote sensing perspectives to identify and attribute land surface dynamics in Central Asia 2001–2013. Remote Sens Environ 170:48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dukhovny V, Navratil P, Rusiev I, Stulina G, Roshenko Y (2008) Comprehensive remote sensing and ground based studies of the dried Aral Sea bed. SIC ICWC, Tashkent, p 173Google Scholar
  11. Esenov SE, Sydykov ZS, Altunin VS, Tursunov AA, Telemtaev MM (1992) The Aral Sea problem must be solved. Hydrotech Constr 26:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foody GM (2003) Remote sensing of tropical forest environments: towards the monitoring of environmental resources for sustainable development. Int J Remote Sens 24:4035–4046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghimire B, Rogan J, Galiano VR, Panday P, Neeti N (2012) An evaluation of bagging, boosting, and random forests for land-cover classification in cape cod, Massachusetts, USA. GISci Remote Sens 49:623–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glantz MH (2005) Water, climate, and development issues in the Amu Darya basin. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 10:23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groll M, Opp C, Aslanov I (2013) Spatial and temporal distribution of the dust deposition in Central Asia: results from a long term monitoring program. Aeolian Res 9:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guan D, Li H, Inohae T, Su W, Nagaie T, Hokao K (2011) Modeling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model. Ecol Model 222:3761–3772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halmy MWA, Gessler PE, Hicke JA, Salem BB (2015) Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in the north-western coastal desert of Egypt using Markov-CA. Appl Geogr 63:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han D, Chan L, Zhu N (2007) Flood forecasting using support vector machines. J Hydroinf 9:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han J, Hayashi Y, Cao X, Imura H (2009) Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: a case study of Shanghai, China. Landsc Urb Plan 91:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen MC (2012) Classification trees and mixed pixel training data. In: Giri CP (ed) Remote sensing of land use and land cover, principles and applications. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Indoitu R, Orlovsky L, Orlovsky N (2012) Dust storms in Central Asia: spatial and temporal variations. J Arid Environ 85:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Indoitu R, Kozhoridze G, Batyrbaeva M, Vitkovskaya I, Orlovsky N, Blumberg D, Orlovsky L (2015) Dust emission and environmental changes in the dried bottom of the Aral Sea. Aeolian Res 17:101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Issanova G, Abuduwaili J, Kaldybayev A, Semenov O, Dedova T (2015) Dust storms in Kazakhstan: frequency and division. J Geol Soc India 85:348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kondratyev K, Grigoryev A, Zhvalev V, Melentyev V (1985) An integrated study of dust storms in the Aral region. Meteorol Hydrol 4:32–38Google Scholar
  25. Kozhoridze G, Orlovsky L, Orlovsky N (2012) Monitoring land cover dynamics in the Aral Sea region by remote sensing. vol. 8538. pp 85381V–85381VGoogle Scholar
  26. Kravtsova VI, Tarasenko TV (2010) Space monitoring of Aral Sea Degradation. Water Resour 37:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lioubimtseva E, Henebry GM (2009) Climate and environmental change in arid Central Asia: impacts, vulnerability, and adaptations. J Arid Environ 73:963–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Löw F, Navratil P, Kotte K, Schöler HF, Bubenzer O (2013) Remote-sensing-based analysis of landscape change in the desiccated seabed of the Aral Sea—a potential tool for assessing the hazard degree of dust and salt storms. Environ Monit Assess 185:8303–8319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melgani F, Bruzzone L (2004) Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42:1778–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Micklin P (2007) The Aral Sea disaster. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 35:47–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Micklin P (2008) Using satellite remote sensing to study and monitor The Aral Sea and adjacent zone. In: Qi J, Evered KT (eds) Environmental problems of Central Asia and their economic, social and security impacts. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Micklin P (2010) The past, present, and future Aral Sea. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 15:193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muller MR, Middleton J (1994) A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara region, Ontario, Canada. Landsc Ecol 9:151–157Google Scholar
  34. Nezlin NP, Kostianoy AG, Lebedev SA (2004) Interannual variations of the discharge of Amu Darya and Syr Darya estimated from global atmospheric precipitation. J Mar Syst 47:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Hara SL, Wiggs GFS, Mamedov B, Davidson G, Hubbard RB (2000) Exposure to airborne dust contaminated with pesticide in the Aral Sea region. The Lancet 355:627–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orlovsky L, Orlovsky L (2002) White sand storms in Central Asia, global alarm: dust and sand storms from the World’s Drylands. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Bangkok, pp 169–201Google Scholar
  37. Orlovsky L, Tolkacheva G, Orlovsky N, Mamedov B (2004) Dust storms as a factor of atmospheric air pollution in the Aral Sea basin. Adv Air Pollut Ser 14:353–362Google Scholar
  38. Overmars KP, de Koning GHJ, Veldkamp A (2003) Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models. Ecol Model 164:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pal M, Mather PM (2005) Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 26:1007–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peterson LK, Bergen KM, Brown DG, Vashchuk L, Blam Y (2009) Forested land-cover patterns and trends over changing forest management eras in the Siberian Baikal region. For Ecol Manag 257:911–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petropoulos GP, Kontoes C, Keramitsoglou I (2011) Burnt area delineation from a uni-temporal perspective based on Landsat TM imagery classification using Support Vector Machines. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 13:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pijanowski BC, Brown DG, Shellito BA, Manik GA (2002) Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: a land transformation model. Comput Environ Urb Syst 26:553–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pontius GR, Malanson J (2005) Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19:243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roy SB, Smith M, Morris L, Orlovsky N, Khalilov A (2014) Impact of the desiccation of the Aral Sea on summertime surface air temperatures. J Arid Environ 110:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sang L, Zhang C, Yang J, Zhu D, Yun W (2011) Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA–Markov model. Math Comput Model 54:938–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Semenov OE (2012) Dust storms and sandstorms and aerosol long-distance transport. In: Breckle S-W, Wucherer W, Dimeyeva LA, Ogar NP (eds) Aralkum—a man-made desert: the desiccated floor of the Aral Sea (Central Asia). Springer, Berlin, pp 73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shao Y, Lunetta RS (2012) Comparison of support vector machine, neural network, and CART algorithms for the land-cover classification using limited training data points. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 70:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shi W, Wang M (2015) Decadal changes of water properties in the Aral Sea observed by MODIS-Aqua. J Geophys Res Oceans 120:4687–4708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shi W, Wang M, Guo W (2014) Long-term hydrological changes of the Aral Sea observed by satellites. J Geophys Res Oceans 119:3313–3326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singer A, Zobeck T, Poberezsky L, Argaman E (2003) The PM10and PM2·5 dust generation potential of soils/sediments in the Southern Aral Sea Basin, Uzbekistan. J Arid Environ 54:705–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spivak L, Terechov A, Vitkovskaya I, Batyrbayeva M, Orlovsky L (2012) Dynamics of dust transfer from the desiccated Aral Sea bottom analysed by remote sensing. In: Breckle S-W, Wucherer W, Dimeyeva LA, Ogar NP (eds) Aralkum—a man-made desert: the desiccated floor of the Aral Sea (Central Asia). Springer, Berlin, pp 97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stulina G, Sektimenko V (2004) The change in soil cover on the exposed bed of the Aral Sea. J Mar Syst 47:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Szuster BW, Chen Q, Borger M (2011) A comparison of classification techniques to support land cover and land use analysis in tropical coastal zones. Appl Geogr 31:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Wickramasuriya RC, Bregt AK, van Delden H, Hagen-Zanker A (2009) The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended Constrained Cellular Automata land use model. Ecol Model 220:2302–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiggs GFS, O’Hara SL, Wegerdt J, Van Der Meer J, Small I, Hubbard R (2003) The dynamics and characteristics of aeolian dust in dryland Central Asia: possible impacts on human exposure and respiratory health in the Aral Sea basin. Geogr J 169:142–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wucherer W, Breckle S-W (2001) Vegetation dynamics on the dry sea floor of the Aral Sea. In: Breckle S-W, Veste M, Wucherer W (eds) Sustainable land use in deserts. Springer, Berlin, pp 52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wulder MA, White JC, Goward SN, Masek JG, Irons JR, Herold M, Cohen WB, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE (2008) Landsat continuity: issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring. Remote Sens Environ 112:955–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yuan F, Sawaya KE, Loeffelholz BC, Bauer ME (2005) Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area by multitemporal landsat remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 98:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and GeographyChinese Academy of SciencesUrumqiChina
  2. 2.Chinese Academy of Sciences Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central AsiaUrumqiChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations