Advertisement

Performance assessment of wastewater treatment plants with special reference to phenol removal

  • T. SalaudeenEmail author
  • O. Okoh
  • A. Okoh
Original Paper
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated the performance of five different wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in some rural areas in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, through an assessment of the physicochemical qualities of the effluents and their removal capacity for selected phenolic compounds. Water samples were collected on a monthly basis (February–July 2016), and temperature, pH, turbidity, total dissolved solids (TDS), total suspended solids (TSS), electrical conductivity (EC) and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured on-site using standard methods. Phenolic compounds were determined using the solid-phase extraction technique followed by derivatization and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. Recorded temperatures for all the WWTPs effluents were 29–30 °C in summer, 20–27 °C in autumn and 12–17 °C in winter, and the pH was between 6.8 and 9.1. The treatment processes increased only the DO of the final effluents, while TDS, EC, turbidity and TSS were considerably reduced. Out of the nine phenolic compounds investigated, 2,4-dimethylphenol (2,4-DMP), 4-chloro-3-methylphenol (4-C-3MP), 2-nitrophenol (2-NP) and pentachlorophenol (PCP) were prominent in the influent (17.3–42.1 µg/L) and concentrations of phenolic compounds in the effluents and receiving water bodies were mostly below the tolerable limits allowed internationally for a safe aquatic environment. Generally, the WWTPs removal capacities range between 33 and 96%, however, South Africa standard limits for discharged effluents were occasionally exceeded especially with some WWTPs. This poses health challenges to rural communities that rely heavily on surface water for domestic use.

Keywords

Final effluent Phenolic compounds Physicochemical parameters Receiving water Wastewater treatment plants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The South Africa Medical Research Council (SAMRC) is gratefully acknowledged for providing the funds to conduct this research. (UFH/SAMRC/P790).

References

  1. Addendum. (Ukhahlamba District Municipality) (2008) Infant deaths: Barkly East. Eastern Cape : Preliminary Epidemological Investigation ReportGoogle Scholar
  2. Akan JC, Abdulrahman FI, Dimari GA et al (2008) Physicochemical determination of pollutants in wastewater and vegetable samples along the Jakara wastewater channel in Kano Metropolis, Kano State, Nigeria. Eur J Sci Res 23:122–133Google Scholar
  3. APHA (American Public Health Association)/AWWA/WEF (2012) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Standard Methods 541. doi: ISBN 9780875532356Google Scholar
  4. Chigor VN, Sibanda T, And Okoh AI (2013) Variations in the physicochemical characteristics of the Buffalo River in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Environ Monit Assess 185:8733–8747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3208-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choksi KN, Sheth MA, And Mehta D (2015) To assess the performance of sewage treatment plant: a case study of Surat city. Int Res J Eng Technol 2:1071–1075Google Scholar
  6. Coskuner G, Ozdemir N (2006) Performance assessment of a wastewater treatment plant treating weak campus wastewater. Int J Environ Pollut 28:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DWAF (1996a) South African Water Quality Guidelines, (Volume 2), Recreational Water Use (2nd edn.). Department of Water Affairs & Forestry, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  8. DWAF (1996b) South African water quality guidelines (Vol.1), domestic uses(2nd ed.) Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and ForestryGoogle Scholar
  9. EC (European Community) (2001) The list of priority substances in the field of water policy and amending directive, Council directive 2455/2001/ECC. Official Journal 331:1–5Google Scholar
  10. Environment C (2001) The state of municipal wastewater effluent in Canada. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3Google Scholar
  11. Fatoki OS, Gogwana P, And Ogunfowokan AO (2003) Pollution assessment in the Keiskamma River and in the impoundment downstream. Water SA 29:183–187.  https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v29i2.4854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fondriest Environmental I (2013) “pH of Water.” Fundamentals of Environmental Measurements. 19 Nov. 2013. Web. http://www.fondriest.com/environmental-measurements/parameters/water-quality/ph/. Accessed 02 Feb 2017
  13. Fondriest Environmental I (2014a) “Water Temperature.” Fundamentals of Environmental Measurements. 7 Feb. 2014. Web. http://www.fondriest.com/environmental-measurements/parameters/water-quality/water-temperature/. Accessed 02 Feb 2017
  14. Fondriest Environmental I (2014b) “Conductivity, Salinity and Total Dissolved Solids.” Fundamentals of Environmental Measurements. 3 Mar 2014. Web. http://www.fondriest.com/environmental-measurements/parameters/water-quality/conductivity-salinity-tds/. Accessed 02 Feb 2017
  15. Fondriest Environmental I (2014c) “Turbidity, Total Suspended Solids and Water Clarity.” Fundamentals of Environmental Measurements. Web. http://www.fondriest.com/environmental-measurements/parameters/water-quality/turbidity-total-suspended-solids-water-clarity/. Accessed 13 June 2014
  16. Gao D, Li Z, Wen Z, Ren N (2014) Occurrence and fate of phthalate esters in full-scale domestic wastewater treatment plants and their impact on receiving waters along the Songhua River in China. Chemosphere 95:24–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guedes S, Leitao A (2012) Effect of phenolic compounds on osmotic stress on the expression of penicillin biosynthetic genes from penicillium chrysogenum var. halophenolicum strain. J Xenobiot 2:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Igbinosa EO, Okoh AI (2009) Impact of discharge wastewater effluents on the physico-chemical qualities of a receiving watershed in a typical rural community. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar B, Verma VK, Sharma CS, Akolkar AB (2014) Quick and easy method for determination of priority phenolic compounds in water and wastewater. J Xenobiot 4:46–52.  https://doi.org/10.4081/xeno.2014.4680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCulloch WL, Goodfellow WL Jr, Black JA (1993) Characterization, identification and confirmation of total dissolved solids as effluent toxicants. Environ Toxicol Risk Assess 2(213–2):27Google Scholar
  21. Mema V (2010) Impact of poorly maintained wastewater and sewage treatment plants: lessons from South Africa. ReSource 12:60–65Google Scholar
  22. Michalowicz J, Duda W (2007) Phenols-Sources and toxicity. Pol J Environ Stud 16:347–362Google Scholar
  23. Munch JW (US. E (2000) Determination of Phenols in drinking water by solid phase extraction and capillary column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).Washington D.C. EPA/815/R-00/014Google Scholar
  24. Obi CL, Momba MNB, Samie A et al (2007) Microbiological, physicochemicalandmanagementparametersimpingingontheefficiencyofsmallwatertreatmentplantsin Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces of South Africa. Water South Afr 33:229–237Google Scholar
  25. Odjadjare EEO, Okoh AI (2010) Physicochemical quality of an urban municipal wastewater effluent and its impact on the receiving environment. Environ Monit Assess 170:383–394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1240-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogunfowokan AO, Okoh EK, Adenuga AAA, Asubiojo OI (2005) Assessment of the impact of point source pollution from a university sewage treatment oxidation pond on the receiving stream—A preliminary study. J Appl Sci 6:36–43Google Scholar
  27. Okoh AI, Odjadjare EE, Igbinosa EO, Osode AN (2007) Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microbial pathogens in the receiving watershed. Afr J Biotechnol 6:2932–2944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olujimi OO, Fatoki OS, Odendaal JP, Daso AP (2012) Chemical monitoring and temporal variation in levels of endocrine disrupting chemicals (priority phenols and phthalate esters) from selected wastewater treatment plant and freshwater systems in Republic of South Africa. Microchem J 101:11–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petrovic M, de Alda MJL, Diaz-Cruz S et al (2009) Fate and removal of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs in conventional and membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment plants and by riverbank filtration. Philos Trans R Soc A 367:3979–4003.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sánchez-Avila J, Bonet J, Velasco G, Lacorte S (2009) Determination and occurrence of phthalates, alkylphenols, bisphenol A, PBDEs, PCBs and PAHs in an industrial sewage grid discharging to a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Sci Total Environ 407:4157–4167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santana C, Ferrera Z, Padron M, Rodriguez J (2009) Methodologies for the extraction of phenolic compounds from environmental samples: new approaches. Molecules 14:298–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schummer C, Sadiki M, Mirabel P, Millet M (2009) Comparison of MTBSTFA and BSTFA in derivatization reactions of polar compounds prior to GC/MS analysis. Chromatographia 63:189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silva SL, Alves A, And Santos L (2009) Uncertainty measurement of chlorophenols and PCBs analyzed in aqueous media by SPME-GC-ECD. J Chromatogr Sci 47(1):03–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sim W, Lee S, Lee I et al (2009) Distribution and formation of chlorophenols and bromophenols in marine and riverine environments. Chemosphere 77:552–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sukumaran D, Saha R, And Saxena RC (2015) performance evaluation of prevailing biological wastewater treatment systems in West Bengal, India. Appl Ecol Environ Sci 3:1–4Google Scholar
  36. Tebbut THY (1998) Principles of water quality. Pergamon., illustrate. ButterWorth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. USEPA (2009) National primary drinking water regulations. Safe Drinking Water Act EPA 816-F-09-004; http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/upload/mcl-2.pdf. Retrieved 26 Jan 2017
  38. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1982) Appendix A to 40 CFR, Part 423–126 Priority Pollutants. https://www.epa.gov/eg/toxic-and-priority-pollutants-under-clean-water-act. Accessed 19 Jan 2017
  39. Wang Y, Hu W, Cao Z et al (2005) Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting compounds in reclaimed water from Tianjin, China. Anal Bioanal Chem 383:857–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. WHO (1989) Environmental health criteria 93. Chlorophenols other than pentachlorophenol. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  41. WHO (2004) Rolling revision of the WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality, draft for review and comments. Nitrates and nitrites in drinking-water. World Health Organization (WHO/SDE/WSH/04.08/56)Google Scholar
  42. Williums P (2008) Quantification and relative comparison of different type of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling. Water Res 42:3539–3551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao JL, Ying GG, Wang L et al (2009) Determination of phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals and acidic pharmaceuticals in surface water of the Pearl Rivers in South China by gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. Sci Total Environ 407:962–974.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou F, Li X, And Zeng Z (2005) Determination of phenolic compounds in wastewater samples using a novel fiber by solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography. Anal Chimica Acta 538:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring CentreUniversity of Fort HareAliceSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Fort HareAliceSouth Africa
  3. 3.Applied and Environmental Microbiology Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and MicrobiologyUniversity of Fort HareAliceSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations