Sycamore failure hazard classification model (SFHCM): an environmental decision support system (EDSS) in urban green spaces
- 157 Downloads
Although the pruning of trees is known as the one of the principal domains of green space management, it is includes shortcomings in practical models or methodologies to classify or prioritize hazardous trees. This paper aims to formulate physical and biological and associated tree factors with sycamore failure probability which results to classify tree failure hazard using artificial neural network (ANN) modeling, as an environmental decision support system (EDSS). Considering the outputs of modeling process, multi-layer feed-forward network (MLFN), which is used to train sycamore (Platanus orientalis) failure hazard classification model (SFHCM), indicates that the performance of SFHCM is statistically accurate. Changes in physical and biological tree factors with the maximum priority in sensitivity analysis assist decision makers to increase SFHCM class and decrease tree failure hazard. Finally a soundly applicable EDSS with new tool is designed for green space managers to prioritize criteria in sycamore failure hazard in order to plan for the most appropriate mitigation plan.
KeywordsHazardous tree Neural network Decision making Sensitivity analysis
We are grateful to the University of Tehran for partially cooperation in data collection. We are thankful to our colleagues who provided expertise that greatly assisted the research.
- Elmahdi A, McFarlane D (2009) A decision support system for sustainable groundwater management. Case study: Gnangara sustainability strategy – Western Australia. International Congress on Modeling and Simulation, Australia Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia, 13–17 July 2009Google Scholar
- Harris RW (1992) Arboriculture: integrated management of landscape trees, shrubs, and vines, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 674Google Scholar
- Matheny NP, Clark JR (1994) A photographic guide to the evaluation of hazard trees in urban areas. International Society of Arboriculture, Urbana, pp 54–55Google Scholar
- Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 43–47Google Scholar
- Sieghardt M, Mursch-Radlgruber E, Paoletti E, Couenberg E, Dimitrakopoulus A, Rego F, Hatzistathis A, Randrup TB (2005) The abiotic urban environment: impact of urban growing conditions on urban vegetation. In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 281–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sreetheran M, Adnan M, Khairil Azuar AK (2011) Street tree inventory and tree risk assessment of selected major roads in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Arboric Urban For 37:226–235Google Scholar
- Statistical Center of Iran (2011) The results of people and houses statistic. Statistical Center of Iran Press, Tehran, pp 2453–2466Google Scholar
- Zangeneh M, Omid M, Akram A (2010) Assessment of machinery energy ratio in potato production by means of artificial neural network. Afr J Agric Res 5(1):993–998Google Scholar