Advertisement

Fate of bromine-containing disinfection by-products precursors during ozone and ultraviolet-based advanced oxidation processes

  • M. Petronijević
  • J. AgbabaEmail author
  • S. Ražić
  • J. Molnar Jazić
  • A. Tubić
  • M. Watson
  • B. Dalmacija
Original Paper
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

This research evaluates the effect of ultraviolet photolysis, ozonation and ozonation/ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes on different disinfection by-product precursors, during the treatment of water with low organic matter and moderate bromide contents. After different combinations of ultraviolent fluence and ozone, the formation potentials of trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids were investigated. Bromine incorporation factors were used to give specific insight into the behaviour of brominated disinfection by-products, and inorganic bromate formation was also determined. The ozone/ultraviolet process was found to be more effective in reducing the total natural organic matter content than ozonation or ultraviolet photolysis alone. Ultraviolet photolysis was more successful removing the precursors of brominated trihalomethanes than chlorinated trihalomethanes, but slightly increased the precursors of both brominated and chlorinated haloacetic acids. During ozonation, reductions in the haloacetic acid formation potential were significantly better than those of the trihalomethanes formation potential (up to 54 and 27%, respectively). In the combined ozonation/ultraviolet process, increasing the ultraviolet fluence had a varying effect on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid precursor behaviour, depending on the ozone dose applied. Bromine incorporation after ozonation alone increased to up to 38% of the total bromide, largely as a result of bromate formation. The combined process curtailed all bromate formation, but increased the bromine incorporation up to 48% at higher ozone doses, with disinfection by-product formation shifting towards the more toxic brominated species.

Keywords

Advanced oxidation processes Bromine incorporation Disinfection by-product precursors Natural organic matter Ozonation Ultraviolet photolysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Projects III43005 and III43009) and Anahem d.o.o. laboratory in Belgrade for the analytical support.

References

  1. Agbaba J, Molnar Jazic J, Tubic A, Watson M, Maletic S, Kragulj Isakovski M, Dalmacija B (2016) Oxidation of natural organic matter with processes involving O3, H2O2 and UV light: formation of oxidation and disinfection by-products. RSC Adv 6:86212–86219.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra18072h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (2012) American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association. Water pollution control federation, 20th ed. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewaterGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazri MM, Barbeau B, Mohseni M (2012) Impact of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation treatment on molecular weight distribution of NOM and biostability of water. Water Res 46(16):5297–5304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2017) Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) and its constituents from water by adsorption: a review. Chemosphere 166:497–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boczkaj G, Fernandes A (2017) Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes at basic pH conditions: a review. J Chem Eng 320:608–633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chin A, Bérubé PR (2005) Removal of disinfection by-product precursors with ozone-UV advanced oxidation process. Water Res 39:2136–2144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crozes G, Cushing R, Rennecker J, Cleveland C, Wright H (2003) Synergies of UV disinfection and ozone in water treatment, International UV Association, Vienna, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  8. Directive 98/83/EC (1998) Directive 98/83/EC of 16 February 1998 on the quality of water for human consumption. Official J. L 123.24.4, pp 26–40Google Scholar
  9. García-Vaquero N, Lee E, Jiménez Castañeda R, Cho J, López-Ramírez JA (2014) Comparison of drinking water pollutant removal using a nanofiltration pilot plant powered by renewable energy and a conventional treatment facility. Desalination 347:94–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goslan EH, Gurses F, Banks J, Parsons SA (2006) An investigation into reservoir NOM reduction by UV photolysis and advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 65:1113–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goslan EH, Krasner SW, Bower M, Rocks SA, Holmes P, Levy LS, Parsons SA (2009) A comparison of disinfection by-products found in chlorinated and chloraminated drinking waters in Scotland. Water Res 43:4698–4706.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu J, Song H, Karanfil T (2010) Comparative analysis of halonitromethane and trihalomethane formation and speciation in drinking water: the effects of disinfectants, pH, bromide, and nitrite. Environ Sci Technol 44:794–799.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es902630u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hua G, Reckhow DA (2012) Evaluation of bromine substitution factors of DBPs during chlorination and chloramination. Water Res 46(4):208–4216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.031 Google Scholar
  14. Lamsal R, Walsh ME, Gagnon GA (2011) Comparison of advanced oxidation processes for the removal of natural organic matter. Water Res 45:3263–3269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malliarou E, Collins C, Graham N, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ (2005) Haloacetic acids in drinking water in the United Kingdom. Water Res 39:2722–2730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mao Y, Wang X, Yang H, Wang H, Xie YF (2014) Effects of ozonation on disinfection by-product formation and speciation during subsequent chlorination. Chemosphere 117:515–520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matilainen A, Sillanpää M (2010) Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 80:351–365.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.04.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meunier L, Canonica S, von Gunten U (2006) Implications of sequential use of UV and ozone for drinking water quality. Water Res 40:1864–1876.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Molnar J, Agbaba J, Dalmacija B, Tubić A, Krčmar D, Maletić S, Tomašević D (2013) The effects of matrices and ozone dose on changes in the characteristics of natural organic matter. J Chem Eng 222:435–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molnar J, Agbaba J, Tubić A, Watson M, Kragulj M, Rončević S, Dalmacija B (2015) The effects of ultraviolet/H2O2 advanced oxidation on the content and characteristics of groundwater natural organic matter. Water Sci Technol WS 15:34–41.  https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2014.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moncayo-Lasso A, Pulgarin C, Benítez N (2008) Degradation of DBPs’ precursors in river water before and after slow sand filtration by photo-Fenton process at pH 5 in solar CPC reactor. Water Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.014 Google Scholar
  22. Mosteo R, Miguel N, Martin-Muniesa N, Ormad MP, Ovelleiro JL (2009) Evaluation of trihalomethane formation potential in function of oxidation processes used during the drinking water production process. J Hazard Mater 172:661–666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Obolensky A, Singer PC (2005) Halogen substitution patterns among disinfection byproducts in the information collection rule database. Environ Sci Technol 39:2719–2730.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0489339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Official Gazette RS No. 42/98 and 44/99 (1998) Regulation on the hygienic quality of drinking water Republic of Serbia (on Serbian) Google Scholar
  25. Oh HJ, Kim WJ, Choi JS, Gee CS, Hwang TM, Kang JG, Kang JW (2003) Optimization and control of ozonation plant using raw water characterization method. Ozone Sci Eng 25:383–392.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01919510390481702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parkinson A, Roddick FA, Hobday MD (2003) UV photooxidation of NOM: issues related to drinking water treatment. J Water Supply Res Technol 52:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petronijević M, Agbaba J, Molnar Jazić J, Watson M, Dalmacija B (2015) The influence of an O3/UV advanced oxidation process on the content of certain disinfection byproduct precursors in water. In: XI Symposium of “Modern technology and economic development” October 22–23. Leskovac, Serbia 211–222. UDC 628.166.094.3-926.214:547-302Google Scholar
  28. Richardson SD, Plewa MJ, Wagner ED, Schoeny R, DeMarini DM (2007) Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: a review and roadmap for research. Mutat Res 636:178–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sakai H, Autin O, Parsons S (2013) Change in haloacetic acid formation potential during UV and UV/H2O2 treatment of model organic compounds. Chemosphere 92:647–651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanly ML, Chiang K, Amal R, Fabris R, Chow C, Drikas M (2007) A study on the removal of humic acid using advanced oxidation processes. Sep Sci Technol 42:1391–1404.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390701289799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Särkkä H, Vepsäläinen M, Sillanpää M (2015) Natural organic matter (NOM) removal by electrochemical methods: a review. J Electroanal Chem 755:100–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.07.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Serrano M, Montesinos I, Cardador MJ, Silva M, Gallego M (2015) Seasonal evaluation of the presence of 46 disinfection by-products throughout a drinking water treatment plant. Sci Total Environ 517:246–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shan J, Hu J, Kaplan-Bekaroglu SS, Song H, Karanfil T (2012) The effects of pH, bromide and nitrite on halonitromethane and trihalomethane formation from amino acids and amino sugars. Chemosphere 86:323–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sindelar HR, Brown MT, Boyer TH (2014) Evaluating UV/H2O2, UV/percarbonate, and UV/perborate for natural organic matter reduction from alternative water sources. Chemosphere 105:112–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sohn J, Amy G, Yoon Y (2006) Bromide ion incorporation into brominated disinfection by-products. Water Air Soil Pollut 174:265–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9104-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SRPS ISO 8245:2007 (2007) Water quality. Guidelines for determination of total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in waterGoogle Scholar
  37. Tian C, Liu R, Guo T, Liu H, Luo Q, Qu J (2013) Chlorination and chloramination of high-bromide natural water: DBPs species transformation. Sep Purif Technol 102:86–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toor R, Mohseni M (2007) UV-H2O2 based AOP and its integration with biological activated carbon treatment for DBP reduction in drinking water. Chemosphere 66:2087–2095.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tubić A, Agbaba J, Dalmacija B, Molnar J, Maletić S, Watson M, Ugarčina Perović S (2013) Insight into changes during coagulation in NOM reactivity for trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids formation. J Environ Manag 118:153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. USEPA (1995) Method 551.1: determination of chlorination disinfection byproducts, chlorinated solvents, and halogenated pesticides/herbicides in drinking water. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  41. USEPA (1996a) Method 5030B: purge and trap for aqueous samples. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  42. USEPA (1996b) Method 8260B: volatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  43. USEPA (2003) Method 552.3: determination of haloacetic acids and dalapon in drinking water by liquid–liquid microextraction, derivatization, and gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Technical support center office of ground water and drinking water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  44. USEPA (2006) National primary drinking water regulations: stage 2 disinfectants and disinfection by products rule: final rule. Fed Regist 71(2):388–493Google Scholar
  45. Uyak V, Toroz I (2007) Investigation of bromide ion effects on disinfection by-products formation and speciation in an Istanbul water supply. J Hazard Mater 149:445–451.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. von Gunten U (2003) Ozonation of drinking water: part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res 37:1443–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00457-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wert EC, Rosario-Ortiz FL (2011) Effect of ozonation on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation and speciation in a full-scale distribution system. Ozone Sci Eng 33:14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2011.536504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang X, Peng J, Chen B, Guo W, Liang Y, Liu W, Liu L (2012) Effects of ozone and ozone/peroxide pretreatments on disinfection byproduct formation during subsequent chlorination and chloramination. J Hazard Mater 239–240:348–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadRepublic of Serbia
  2. 2.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeRepublic of Serbia

Personalised recommendations