Advertisement

Carbon steel slag and stainless steel slag for removal of arsenic from stimulant and real groundwater

  • W. Shi
  • H. Li
  • G. Liao
  • G. Pei
  • Y. Lin
Original Paper
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

Arsenic in groundwater is a serious environmental problem. The contamination of groundwater with arsenic has been of utmost concern worldwide. Steel slag is a solid waste generated from steel production. Although steel slags have been used for arsenic removal from water, this process has not been systematically or integratively researched. In this study, the arsenic removal capacity and mechanism were investigated for carbon steel slag, stainless steel slag and Fe-modified stainless steel slag based on an in-depth study. The study also evaluated the potential utilization of different steel slag for regeneration. The maximum adsorption of arsenic on carbon steel slag, stainless steel slag and Fe-modified stainless steel slag was 12.20, 3.17 and 12.82 mg g−1 at 25 °C, respectively. The modification of stainless steel slag by FeC13 can generate more pore structures and larger surface areas, and 300 °C treatment produces the best regeneration efficiency. The ΔG values were negative for all of the steel slags, indicating the spontaneous nature of the adsorption process. The solution pH was a critical parameter for the removal of arsenic for steel slags. Under highly alkaline solution conditions, the mechanism of arsenic removal by carbon steel slag and stainless steel slag can be attributed to chemisorption, including chemical precipitation and coordination reactions, and under weakly alkaline solution conditions, electrostatic interaction and specific adsorption are the arsenic removal mechanisms by Fe-modified stainless steel slag. Regeneration of the Fe-modified stainless steel slag was better achieved than that of the other steel slags in the application of high-temperature treatment.

Keywords

Arsenic pollution Groundwater remediation Modification Regeneration experiment Steel slag 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Grand Science and Technology Special Project of Shanxi Province (20111101016), the Science & Technology Key Program of Shanxi Province (20140311008-6), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU116087 and XDJK2017B013) and New Star Foundation on Shaanxi Province Youth Science and Technology (2016KJXX-89).

Supplementary material

13762_2017_1603_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Ahn JS, Chon CM, Moon HS, Kim KW (2003) Arsenic removal using steel manufacturing byproducts as permeable reactive materials in mine tailing containment systems. Water Res 37:2478–2488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajmal M, Khan AH, Ahmad S, Ahmad A (1998) Role of sawdust in the removal of copper(II) from industrial wastes. Water Res 32:3085–3091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Agarwal S, Tyagi I, Gupta VK (2015) Removal of basic dye Auramine-O by ZnS: Cu nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: optimization of parameters using response surface methodology with central composite design. RSC Adv 5:18438–18450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas A, Gustafsson JP, Neidhardt H, Halder D, Kundu AK, Chatterjee D, Berner Z, Bhattacharya P (2014) Role of competing ions in the mobilization of arsenic in groundwater of Bengal Basin: insight from surface complexation modeling. Water Res 55:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bothe JV, Brown PW (1999) Arsenic immobilization by calcium arsenate formation. Environ Sci Technol 33:3806–3811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerkez EB, Bhandari N, Reeder RJ, Strongin DR (2015) Coupled redox transformation of chromate and arsenite on ferrihydrite. Environ Sci Technol 49:2858–2866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakrabortty S, Sen M, Pal P (2014) Arsenic removal from contaminated groundwater by membrane-integrated hybrid plant: optimization and control using visual basic platform. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:3840–3857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty A, Sengupta A, Bhadu MK, Pandey A, Mondal A (2014) Efficient removal of arsenic (V) from water using steel-making slag. Water Environ Res 86:524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claveau-Mallet D, Wallace S, Comeau Y (2013) Removal of phosphorus, fluoride and metals from a gypsum mining leachate using steel slag filters. Water Res 47:1512–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dastkhoon M, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Goudarzi A, Langroodi SM, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2015) Ultrasound assisted adsorption of malachite green dye onto ZnS:Cu-NP-AC: Equilibrium isotherms and kinetic studies—response surface optimization. Sep Purif Technol 156:780–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donmez M, Camci S, Akbal F, Yagan M (2015) Adsorption of copper from aqueous solution onto natural sepiolite: equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamics, and regeneration studies. Desalin Water Treat 54:2868–2882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan JM, Su B (2014) Removal characteristics of Cd(II) from acidic aqueous solution by modified steel-making slag. Chem Eng J 246:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutre V, Vandecasteele C (1998) Immobilization mechanism of arsenic in waste solidified using cement and lime. Environ Sci Technol 32:2782–2787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Essandoh M, Wolgemuth D, Pittman C, Mohan D, Mlsna T (2017) Adsorption of metribuzin from aqueous solution using magnetic and nonmagnetic sustainable low-cost biochar adsorbents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4577–4590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freundlich H, Heller W (1939) The Adsorption of cis- and trans-Azobenzene. J Am Chem Soc 61:2228–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossl PR, Eick M, Sparks DL, Goldberg S, Ainsworth CC (1997) Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 2. Kinetic evaluation using a pressure-jump relaxation technique. Environ Sci Technol 31:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta VK, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Sadegh H, Shahryari-ghoshekandi R, Yari M, Yousefi-nejat O (2015) Experimental study of surfaces of hydrogel polymers HEMA, HEMA–EEMA–MA, and PVA as adsorbent for removal of azo dyes from liquid phase. J Mol Liq 206:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta VK, Saravanan R, Agarwal S, Gracia F, Khan MM, Qin J, Mangalaraja RV (2017) Degradation of azo dyes under different wavelengths of UV light with chitosan-SnO2 nanocomposites. J Mol Liq 232:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho YS (2006) Review of second-order models for adsorption systems. J Hazard Mater 136:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jia Y, Luo T, Yu X, Sun B, Liu JH, Huang XJ (2013) Synthesis of monodispersed alpha-FeOOH nanorods with a high content of surface hydroxyl groups and enhanced ion-exchange properties towards As(V). RSC Adv 3:15805–15811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanel SR, Greneche JM, Choi H (2006) Arsenic(V) removal kom groundwater using nano scale zero-valent iron as a colloidal reactive barrier material. Environ Sci Technol 40:2045–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim YS, Kim DH, Yang JS, Baek K (2012) Adsorption characteristics of As(III) and As(V) on alum sludge from water purification facilities. Sep Sci Technol 47:2211–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lackovic JA, Nikolaidis NP, Dobbs GM (2000) Inorganic arsenic removal by zero-valent iron. Environ Eng Sci 17:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lagergren S (1898) About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 24:1–39Google Scholar
  25. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luo K, Zhang S, Tian Y, Gao X (2014) Arsenic distribution pattern in different sources of drinking water and their geological background in Guanzhong basin, Shaanxi, China. Acta Geol Sin-English Ed 88:984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martinez-Villegas N, Briones-Gallardo R, Ramos-Leal JA, Avalos-Borja M, Castanon-Sandoval AD, Razo-Flores E, Villalobos M (2013) Arsenic mobility controlled by solid calcium arsenates: a case study in Mexico showcasing a potentially widespread environmental problem. Environ Pollut 176:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nekouei F, Nekouei S, Tyagi I, Gupta VK (2015) Kinetic, thermodynamic and isotherm studies for acid blue 129 removal from liquids using copper oxide nanoparticle-modified activated carbon as a novel adsorbent. J Mol Liq 201:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nikfar E, Dehghani MH, Mahvi AH, Rastkari N, Asif M, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2016) Removal of Bisphenol A from aqueous solutions using ultrasonic waves and hydrogen peroxide. J Mol Liq 213:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oh C, Rhee S, Oh M, Park J (2012) Removal characteristics of As(III) and As(V) from acidic aqueous solution by steel making slag. J Hazard Mater 213–214:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rajendran S, Khan MM, Gracia F, Qin J, Gupta VK, Arumainathan S (2016) Ce3+-ion-induced visible-light photocatalytic degradation and electrochemical activity of ZnO/CeO2 nanocomposite. Sci Rep 6:31641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robati D, Mirza B, Rajabi M, Moradi O, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2016) Removal of hazardous dyes-BR 12 and methyl orange using graphene oxide as an adsorbent from aqueous phase. Chem Eng J 284:687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salvador F, Martin-Sanchez N, Sanchez-Hernandez R, Sanchez-Montero MJ, Izquierdo C (2015) Regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbents. Part I: thermal regeneration. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 202:259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saravanan R, Shankar H, Prakash T, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2011) ZnO/CdO composite nanorods for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible light. Mater Chem Phys 125:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saravanan R, Gupta VK, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2013a) Comparative study on photocatalytic activity of ZnO prepared by different methods. J Mol Liq 181:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saravanan R, Karthikeyan N, Gupta VK, Thirumal E, Thangadurai P, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2013b) ZnO/Ag nanocomposite: an efficient catalyst for degradation studies of textile effluents under visible light. Mater Sci Eng C 33:2235–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saravanan R, Karthikeyan S, Gupta VK, Sekaran G, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2013c) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnO/CuO nanocomposite for the degradation of textile dye on visible light illumination. Mater Sci Eng C 33:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saravanan R, Gupta VK, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2014) Visible light degradation of textile effluent using novel catalyst ZnO/γ-Mn2O3. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 45:1910–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saravanan R, Khan MM, Gupta VK, Mosquera E, Gracia F, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2015) ZnO/Ag/Mn2O3 nanocomposite for visible light-induced industrial textile effluent degradation, uric acid and ascorbic acid sensing and antimicrobial activity. RSC Adv 5:34645–34651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sun YK, Zhou GM, Xiong XM, Guan XH, Li LN, Bao HL (2013) Enhanced arsenite removal from water by Ti(SO4)(2) coagulation. Water Res 47:4340–4348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. USEPA (1992) Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure. Method 1311. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang YX, Guo HM, Yan SL, Li YL (2004) Geochemical evolution of shallow groundwater systems and their vulnerability to contaminants: a case study at Datong Basin, Shanxi Province, China. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  43. Weber W, Morris J (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div Am Soc Civ Eng 89:31–60Google Scholar
  44. Wickramasinghe SR, Han BB, Zimbron J, Shen Z, Karim MN (2004) Arsenic removal by coagulation and filtration: comparison of groundwaters from the United States and Bangladesh. Desalination 169:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang JS, Kim YS, Park SM, Baek K (2014) Removal of As(III) and As(V) using iron-rich sludge produced from coal mine drainage treatment plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:10878–10889CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Karst Environment, School of Geographical SciencesSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.School of Environmental Science and ResourcesShanxi UniversityTaiyuanChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations