Advertisement

Design of insurance pattern of organic products (case study: tomato of Murghab plain)

  • A. Fattahi ArdakaniEmail author
  • M. Hashemi Shiri
Original Paper
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The supply of foods of planet’s growing population has caused an increase in the use of pesticides and unnatural chemicals in agriculture. The increasing use of these chemicals has caused a variety of serious diseases. In organic farming, the use of unnatural chemicals has been prohibited to provide safe and adequate foods. Lack of chemicals, especially in the early years, will decrease the performance of organic farming system. On the one hand, the importance of public health and, on the other hand, reduction in organic farming performance increase the importance of the study of organic farming in the terms of producers and market as well as factors affecting the adoption of organic farming among farmers and providing appropriate support and understanding of the factors involved in its solution. In the present study that has been done in two steps, it has been tried to assess the factors affecting the adoption of organic farming systems and its premium. The results of the analysis of data obtained from 500 questionnaires completed by farmers of the Murgab plain region (agronomic years 2015–2016) to investigate the factors affecting the adoption of organic farming systems as well as the data of 500 completed questionnaires related to the premium insurance showed using the logic model farmers willingness to accept the least amount of 0.347 $ per kg organic tomatoes and farmers willing to get this amount of money to replace their conventional culture with organic farming. The results also showed that in the case of development of organic farming, farmers are willing to pay the maximum amount of 102.3 $ as premium per hectare of organic cultivation.

Keywords

Insurance premium Organic farming Market Murghab plain Willingness to accept 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all supports from research deputy of Ardakan University related to this research.

References

  1. Abedi Z, Fattahi Ardakani A, Hanifnejad AR, Dashti Rahmatabadi N (2014) Groundwater valuation and quality preservation in Iran: the case of Yazd. Int J Environ Res 8(1):213–220Google Scholar
  2. Chaharsooghi Amin H, Bahrami Pour M, Ghorbani Pir alidehi F (2015) Check factors on satisfaction citrus growers from performance agricultural insurance fund in the Ilam Province, (43):97–114Google Scholar
  3. Economic Service of Correspondents’ Club (2015) 5th development plan of islamic revelution, IranGoogle Scholar
  4. Enjolaras G, Sentis P (2008) The main determination of insurance purchase an empirical study on crop insurance policies in France. In: 12th EAA CongressGoogle Scholar
  5. Ezzatabadi A, Nejati (2007) The possibility use of regional insurance of agricultural products in iran (case study :pistachio). Agric Sci J 30(1):37–50Google Scholar
  6. Fatahi A (2010) Implication of single-bounded dichotomous choice in estimating recreational-tourism value of environmental endowment in desert areas (case study: Gharbalbiz Spring in Yazd Providence). Iranian J Agric Econ Develop Res 44(1):Pe43–Pe53 (in persian) Google Scholar
  7. Fattahi A (2013) Economic valuation of the balminess of natural resources in dry climates: case study: Chack- Chack Tourism Region in Yazd. Agric Econ Develop, 91–11. (in persian)Google Scholar
  8. Fattahi Ardakani A (2016) Estimating willingness to pay in order to prevent external intangible effects of dust in Yazd-Ardakan plain. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(6):1489–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fattahi Ardakani A et al (2017) The comparison of discrete payment vehicle methods (dichotomous choice) in improving the quality of the environment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14(7):1409–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghazanfar S, Qi-wen Z, Abdullah M, Ahmad Z, Lateef M (2015) Farmers’ perception and awareness and factors affecting awareness of farmers regarding crop insurance as a risk coping mechanism evidence from Pakistan. J Northeast Agric 22(1):76–82Google Scholar
  11. Ghorbani M, Koochaki A, Mahmoodi H (2014) Virtual estimation of wheat yield in the conditions of organic production; Khorasan Razavi Province. Environ Sci 12(1):23–30Google Scholar
  12. Greene W (2002) Econometric analysis. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanemann WM (1994) Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J Econ Perspect 8(4):19–43. http://www.yjc.ir/fa/news
  14. Judge GG, Hill RC, Griffithes WE, Lutkepohl H, Lee TC (1988) The theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Koocheki A (2004) Organic agriculture: opportunity and challenges. Cultural Sci Lett 24–25:55–95Google Scholar
  16. Lee C, Han S (2002) Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks tourism resources using a contingent valuation method. Tour Manag 23:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malek saeidi H, Ajili A, Rezaei moghaddam K (2009) Factors affecting knowledge of agricultural experts toward organic farming in Jihad-e-Keshavarzi organization. Khuzestan Province 40(2):81–91Google Scholar
  18. Niknami M, Lashkrara F, Hatami F (2009) Impacts of agricultural crops insurance on economic situation of damaged wheat farmers in the Qom city. J Agric Ext Educ Res 3:107–118Google Scholar
  19. Park T, Loomis J (1996) Joint estimation of contingent valuation survey responses. Environ Resour Econ 7:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rastgou H, Rezvanfar A (2007) A survey of effective factors in developing strategic agricultural commodities insurance in Khodabandeh. Eqtesad-e-Keshavarzi Towse’e 15(58):111–134Google Scholar
  21. Sedaghat R, Kamalinejad H, Hkaledi M (2015) Check effect agricultural insurance on product revenue in different operating system. Case study pistachios in the city Rafsanjan. Agric Insurance Fund 43:79–96Google Scholar
  22. Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2012) Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Published online 25 April 2012Google Scholar
  23. Vandeveer ML (2001) Demand for area crop insurance among litchi producers in northern Vietnam. Agric Econ 26(2):173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agriculture and Natural ResourceArdakan UniversityArdakanIran

Personalised recommendations