Bioslurry phase remediation of petroleum-contaminated soil using potato peels powder through biosurfactant producing Bacillus licheniformis J1

  • Amar Jyoti Das
  • Rajesh KumarEmail author
Original Paper


Soil contamination due to petroleum oil has become significant ecological issue due to their toxicity. Thus, detoxification of petroleum-contaminated soil is of pressing concern. In this study, bench-scale bioslurry experiment was carried for remediation and detoxification of petroleum-contaminated soil. Potato peels powder was used as organic nutrient source in the slurry for biostimulation purpose, while biosurfactant producing Bacillus licheniformis strain J1 identified through molecular approach is used as inocula in the slurry treatment. The strain J1 has the capability to utilized petroleum as carbon source, but its efficiency increase in the presence of potato peels powder. Bioslurry phase experiment was categorized into four groups based on the treatment, such as B0 (soil + H2O), B1 (soil + petroleum oil + H2O), B2 (soil + petroleum oil + strain J1 + H2O), B3 (soil + petroleum oil + potato peels powder + strain J1 + H2O). After 90 days of treatment, the soils from each treatment were subjected to toxicity analysis using earth worm acute toxicity test and seed germination inhibition assay. The results suggest that in B1 treatment the toxicity effect on germination and seedling growth is highest, while decrease in effect was observed in case of B2 and B3 treatment. Results of earthworm acute toxicity test revealed that 30 ± 5% earthworm survival rates was reported in B1 treatment, whereas 71.6 ± 2.8 and 78.3 ± 2.8% was observed in B2 and B3 treatment, respectively. Hence, the result of the present study signifies that bioslurry phase treatment can be effectively and commercially used for detoxification petroleum-contaminated wastelands.


Remediation Detoxification Petroleum-contaminated soil Biosurfactant Bioslurry 



The research support received from DST Inspire programme to author Amar Jyoti Das is duly acknowledged.


  1. Adam G, Duncan H (2002) Influence of diesel fuel on seed germination. Environ Poll 120:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Mutairi N, Bufarsan A, Al-Rukaibi F (2008) Ecorisk evaluation and treatability potential of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon-based fuels. Chemosphere 74(1):142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amund OO, Nwokoye N (1993) Hydrocarbon potentials of yeast isolates from a polluted Lagoon. J Sci Res Develop 1:65–68Google Scholar
  4. Atlas RM (1975) Effects of temperature and crude oil composition on petroleum biodegradation. J Appl Microbiol 30:396–403Google Scholar
  5. Baek KH, Kim HS, Oh HM, Yoon BD, Kim J, Lee IS (2004) Effects of crude oil, oil components, and bioremediation on plant growth. J Environ Sci Health, Part A 39(9):2465–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banks MK, Schultz KE (2005) Comparison of plants for germination toxicity tests in petroleum-contaminated soils. Water, Air, Soil Poll 167(1):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodour AA, Drees KP, Maier RM (2003) Distribution of biosurfactant-producing bacteria in undisturbed and contaminated arid southwestern soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3280–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper DG, Goldenberg BG (1987) Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:224–229Google Scholar
  9. Cruz JM, Lopes PRM, Montagnolli RN, Tamada IS, Silva NMMG, Bidoia ED (2013) Phytotoxicity of soil contaminated with petroleum derivatives and biodiesel. Ecotoxic Environ Conta 8(1):49–54Google Scholar
  10. D’Souza R, Varun M, Paul MS (2011) Assessment of wheat bioassays as a monitoring system for phytoremediation of diesel. Biotechnol Bioinf Bioengineer 1:125–130Google Scholar
  11. Das N, Chandran P (2010) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotech Res Inter. Article ID 941810:13p. doi: 10.4061/2011/941810 Google Scholar
  12. Das AJ, Kumar R (2016) Bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil to combat toxicity on Withania somnifera through seed priming with biosurfactant producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. J Environ Manag 174:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorn PB, Salanitro JP (2000) Temporal ecological assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation. Chemosphere 40(4):419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, Great Britain, p 426Google Scholar
  15. El-Sheshtawy HS, Aiad I, Osman ME, Abo-ELnas AA, Kobisy AS (2015) Production of biosurfactant from Bacillus licheniformis for microbial enhanced oil recovery and inhibition the growth of sulfate reducing bacteria. Egyptian J Petro 24(2):155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frutos FJ, García R, Pérez O, Escolano A, Rubio A, Gimeno MD, Fernandez G, Carbonell C, Perucha Laguna J (2012) Remediation trials for hydrocarbon-contaminated sludge from a soil washing process: evaluation of bioremediation technologies. J Hazard Mater 199:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gandhimathi R, Seghal Kiran G, Hema TA, Selvin J, Rajeetha Raviji T, Shanmughapriya S (2009) Production and characterization of lipopeptide biosurfactant by a sponge-associated marine actinomycetes Nocardiopsis alba MSA10. Bioproc  Biosyst Eng 32(6):825–835Google Scholar
  18. George S, Jayac K (2013) Production and characterization of rhamnolipid biosurfactant from waste frying coconut oil using a novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa D. J Appl Microbiol 114(2):373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Handy AR (2007) Acute toxicity and immunotoxicity testing of total petroleum hydrocarbons in aquatic and terrestrial Organisms (Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University)Google Scholar
  20. Hanna SHS, Weaver RW (2002) Earthworm survival in oil contaminated soil. Plant Soil 240(1):127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnsen AR, Wick LY, Harms H (2005) Principles of microbial PAH degradation in soil. Environ Poll 133:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar R, Das AJ, Juwarkar AA (2015) Reclamation of petrol oil contaminated soil by rhamnolipids producing PGPR strains for growing Withania somnifera a medicinal shrub. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marin M, Pedregosa A, Rios S, Laborda F (1996) Study of factors influencing the degradation of heating oil by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus MM5. Inter Biodeter Biodeg 38:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molina-Barahona L, Vega-Loyo L, Guerrero M, Ramirez S, Romero I, Vega-Jarquín C, Albores A (2005) Ecotoxicological evaluation of diesel-contaminated soil before and after a bioremediation process. Environ Toxicol 20(1):100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulligan C, Cooper D, Neufeld R (1984) Selection of microbes producing biosurfactants in media without hydrocarbons. J Ferment Technol 62:311–314Google Scholar
  26. Obayori OS, Ilori MO, Adebusoye SA, Oyetibo GO, Omotayo AE, Amund OO (2009) Degradation of hydrocarbons and biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas sp. strain LP1. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1615–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohno A, AnoT Shoda N (1993) Production of antifungal peptide antibiotic, iturin by Bacillus subtilis NB22 in solid state fermentation. J Ferment Bioeng 75:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pansiripat S, Pornsunthorntawee O, Rujiravanit R, Kitiyanan B, Somboonthanate P, Chavadej S (2010) Biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa SP4 using sequencing batch reactors: Effect of oil-to-glucose ratio. Biochem Eng J 49(2):185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perry JJ (1984) Microbial metabolism of cyclic alkanes. In: Atlas RM (ed) Petroleum microbiology. Macmillan, New York, pp 61–98Google Scholar
  30. Plaza G, Naleez-jaweeki G, Ulfig K, Brigmon RL (2005) The application of bioassays as indicators of petroleum-contaminated soil remediation. Chemosphere 59:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Plaza GA, Zjawiony I, Banat IM (2006) Use of different methods for detection thermophilic biosurfactant-producing bacteria from hydrocarbon contaminated and bioremediated soils. J Petrol Sci Engineer 50:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramadass K, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2015) Ecological implications of motor oil pollution: earthworm survival and soil health. Soil Bio Biochem 85:72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robles-González IV, Fava F, Poggi-Varaldo HM (2008) A review on slurry bioreactors for bioremediation of soils and sediments. Microb Cell Factor 7(1):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ron EZ, Rosenberg E (2002) Biosurfactants and oil bioremediation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13:249–252Google Scholar
  35. Rowell MJ (1977) The effects of crude oil spill on soils. In: Toogood JA (ed) A review of literature I, The reclamation of agricultural soils after oil spills, part I. Edmonton, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  36. Salanitro JP, Dorn PB, Huesemann MH, Moore KO, Rhodes IA, Rice Jackson LM (1997) Crude oil hydrocarbon bioremediation and soil ecotoxicity assessment. Environ Sci Technol 31(6):1769–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shukry WM, Al-Hawas GHS, Al-Moaikal RMS, El-Bendary MA (2013) Effect of petroleum crude oil on mineral nutrient elements, soil properties and bacterial biomass of rhizosphere of jojoba. Br J Environ Clim Change 3:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith B, Stachowisk M, Volkenburgh E (1989) Cellular processes limiting leaf growth in plants under hypoxic root stress. J Exp Bot 40:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tang J, Wang M, Wang F, Sun Q, Zhou Q (2011) Eco-toxicity of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil. J Environ Sci 23(5):845–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tiquia SM, Tam NFY, Hodgkiss IJ (1996) Effects of composting on phytotoxicity of spent pig manure sawdust litter. Environ Poll 93:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torabifar B, Torabian A, Azimi AA, Vossoughi M (2008) Biological treatment of petroleum contaminated soils by soil slurry-sequencing batch reactors (SS-SBRs). WIT Transac Eco Environ 109:751–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Viramontes-Ramos S, Portillo-Ruiz MC, Ballinas-Casarrubias MDL, Torres-Muñoz JV, Rivera-Chavira BE, Nevárez-Moorillón GV (2010) Selectionof biosurfactan/bioemulsifier producing bacteria from hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Brazilian J Microbiol 41:668–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ziółkowska A, Wyszkowski M (2010) Toxicity of petroleum substances to microorganisms and plants. Ecol Chem Eng S 17:73–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rhizospheric Biology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Microbiology, School for Environmental SciencesBabasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar (A Central) UniversityLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations