Development of attapulgite composite ceramsite/quartz sand double-layer biofilter for micropolluted drinking source water purification

  • Z. Wang
  • M. G. Zhong
  • J. F. Wan
  • G. J. Xu
  • Y. Liu
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
  • 663 Downloads

Abstract

This study compared start-up and steady-state affecting factors of attapulgite composite ceramsite/quartz sand double-layer biofilter (ACC/QSDLBF) and quartz sand single-layer biofilter (QSSLBF) on micropolluted drinking source water treatment. Results showed that the ACC has suitable pore size distribution in the range of 5–850 nm which is conducive to biofiltration. Turbidity removal efficiency of ACC/QSDLBF was a little lower than QSSLBF, but organic matters and ammonia removal efficiencies of ACC/QSDLBF were much higher than QSSLBF due to biodegradation and nitrification by microorganisms colonizing on the ACC. At stable state, the growth of head loss for ACC/QSDLBF was lower than that of QSSLBF. The complete filtration cycle of ACC/QSDLBF was 52 h. The total CODMn removal rate of ACC/QSDLBF was 20.93 %, in which 90 % of removed total CODMn was achieved at the upper 60 cm of ACC filter layer. The removal of CODMn decreased from 35.89 to 13.16 % in ACC/QSDLBF when increasing hydraulic loading from 2 to 16 m/h. After analysis of efficient EBCT in ACC/QSDLBF, optimized hydraulic loading was 12 m/h. These conclusions would be helpful to practical application of ACC as functional material for new construction of waterworks, especially upgrading of existing waterworks treating micropolluted drinking source water.

Keywords

Attapulgite composite ceramsite ACC/QSDLBF Biofiltration Start-up Affecting factors Efficient EBCT (EEBCT) 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Housing and Urban and Rural Construction Technology Program of the Ministry of Science and Project (2011-K7-2), the project of Jiangsu government scholarship for study abroad (2012196) and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) for financial support.

References

  1. Abu Hasan H, Abdullah SRS, Kamarudin SK, Kofli NT, Anuar N (2014) Kinetic evaluation of simultaneous COD, ammonia and manganese removal from drinking water using a biological aerated filter system. Sep Purif Technol 130:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benner J, Helbling DE, Kohler H-PE, Wittebol J, Kaiser E, Prasse C, Ternes TA, Albers CN, Aamand J, Horemans B, Springael D, Walravens E, Boon N (2013) Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes? Water Res 47(16):5955–5976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black KE, Berube PR (2014) Rate and extent NOM removal during oxidation and biofiltration. Water Res 52:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai YA, Li D, Liang YH, Zeng HP, Zhang J (2014) Autotrophic nitrogen removal process in a potable water treatment biofilter that simultaneously removes Mn and NH4 +-N. Bioresour Technol 172:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai YN, Li D, Liang YW, Luo YH, Zeng HP, Zhang J (2015) Effective start-up biofiltration method for Fe, Mn, and ammonia removal and bacterial community analysis. Bioresour Technol 176:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu HQ, Dong BZ, Zhang YL, Zhou XF, Yu ZX (2012) Pollutant removal mechanisms in a bio-diatomite dynamic membrane reactor for micro-polluted surface water purification. Desalination 293:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong LH, Liu WJ, Jiang RF, Wang ZS (2014) Physicochemical and porosity characteristics of thermally regenerated activated carbon polluted with biological activated carbon process. Bioresour Technol 171:260–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorival-Garcia N, Zafra-Gomez A, Oliver-Rodriguez B, Navalon A, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Vilchez JL (2014) Effect of the injection of pure oxygen into a membrane bioreactor on the elimination of bisphenol A. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11(1):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng S, Xie SG, Zhang XJ, Yang ZY, Ding W, Liao XB, Liu YY, Chen C (2012) Ammonium removal pathways and microbial community in GAC-sand dual media filter in drinking water treatment. J Environ Sci China 24(9):1587–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gholikandi GB, Noorisepehr M, Dehghanifard E, Koolivand A, Dehnavi A, Moalej S (2012) Application of modified qualitative index for surveillance of water-filtration process in turbidity removal by different media. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(4):691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibert O, Lefevre B, Fernandez M, Bernat X, Paraira M, Pons M (2013a) Fractionation and removal of dissolved organic carbon in a full-scale granular activated carbon filter used for drinking water production. Water Res 47(8):2821–2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibert O, Lefevre B, Fernandez M, Paraira M, Calderer M, Martinez-Llado X (2013b) Characterising biofilm development on granular activated carbon used for drinking water production. Water Res 47(3):1101–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han LN, Liu WJ, Chen M, Zhang ML, Liu SM, Sun RL, Fei XQ (2013a) Comparison of NOM removal and microbial properties in up-flow/down-flow BAC filter. Water Res 47(14):4861–4868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han M, Zhao ZW, Gao W, Cui FY (2013b) Study on the factors affecting simultaneous removal of ammonia and manganese by pilot-scale biological aerated filter (BAF) for drinking water pre-treatment. Bioresour Technol 145:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jez-Walkowiak J, Dymaczewski Z, Weber L (2015) Iron and manganese removal from groundwater by filtration through a chalcedonite bed. J Water Supply Res Technol 64(1):19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jing ZQ, Li YY, Cao SW, Liu YY (2012) Performance of double-layer biofilter packed with coal fly ash ceramic granules in treating highly polluted river water. Bioresour Technol 120:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalkan C, Yapsakli K, Mertoglu B, Tufan D, Saatci A (2011) Evaluation of biological activated carbon (BAC) process in wastewater treatment secondary effluent for reclamation purposes. Desalination 265(1–3):266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennedy AM, Reinert AM, Knappe DRU, Ferrer I, Summers RS (2015) Full-and pilot-scale GAC adsorption of organic micropollutants. Water Res 68:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lautenschlager K, Hwang C, Ling FQ, Liu WT, Boon N, Koster O, Egli T, Hammes F (2014) Abundance and composition of indigenous bacterial communities in a multi-step biofiltration-based drinking water treatment plant. Water Res 62:40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee CO, Boe-Hansen R, Musovic S, Smets B, Albrechtsen HJ, Binning P (2014) Effects of dynamic operating conditions on nitrification in biological rapid sand filters for drinking water treatment. Water Res 64:226–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li YP, Tang CY, Yu ZB, Acharya K (2014) Correlations between algae and water quality: factors driving eutrophication in Lake Taihu, China. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11(1):169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liao XB, Chen C, Wang Z, Wan R, Chang CH, Zhang XJ, Xie SG (2013) Changes of biomass and bacterial communities in biological activated carbon filters for drinking water treatment. Process Biochem 48(2):312–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu CQ, Li S, Gong S, Yuan SJ, Yu X (2015) Mixing regime as a key factor to determine DON formation in drinking water biological treatment. Chemosphere 139:638–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niu J, Kasuga I, Kurisu F, Furumai H, Shigeeda T (2013) Evaluation of autotrophic growth of ammonia-oxidizers associated with granular activated carbon used for drinking water purification by DNA-stable isotope probing. Water Res 47(19):7053–7065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pharand L, Van Dyke MI, Anderson WB, Huck PM (2014) Assessment of biomass in drinking water biofilters by adenosine triphosphate. J Am Water Works Assoc 106(10):63–64Google Scholar
  26. Purswani J, Silva-Castro GA, Guisado IM, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Pozo C (2014) Biological and chemical analyses of a laboratory-scale biofilter for oxygenate bioremediation in simulated groundwater. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11(6):1517–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Safari GH, Hoseini M, Seyedsalehi M, Kamani H, Jaafari J, Mahvi AH (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline using nanosized titanium dioxide in aqueous solution. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(2):603–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz T, Jungfer C, Heissler S, Friedrich F, Faubel W, Obst U (2009) Combined use of molecular biology taxonomy, Raman spectrometry, and ESEM imaging to study natural biofilms grown on filter materials at waterworks. Chemosphere 77(2):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simate GS (2015) The treatment of brewery wastewater for reuse by integration of coagulation/flocculation and sedimentation with carbon nanotubes ‘sandwiched’ in a granular filter bed. J Ind Eng Chem 21:1277–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson DR (2008) Biofilm processes in biologically active carbon water purification. Water Res 42(12):2839–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van den Akker B, Holmes M, Cromar N, Fallowfield H (2008) Application of high rate nitrifying trickling filters for potable water treatment. Water Res 42(17):4514–4524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Velten S, Boller M, Koster O, Helbing J, Weilenmann HU, Hammes F (2011) Development of biomass in a drinking water granular active carbon (GAC) filter. Water Res 45(19):6347–6354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang Z (2015) Efficient adsorption of dibutyl phthalate from aqueous solution by activated carbon developed from phoenix leaves. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(6):1923–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang Z, Jing ZQ, Cheng LL, Shen W, Kong Y (2009) Adsorption of Cr(VI) by attapulgite–zeolite composite ceramsite from aqueous solution. Res J Chem Environ 13(4):13–17Google Scholar
  35. Wu SQ, Qi YF, Yue QY, Gao BY, Gao Y, Fan CZ, He SB (2015) Preparation of ceramic filler from reusing sewage sludge and application in biological aerated filter for soy protein secondary wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 283:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiang H, Lu XW, Yin LH, Yang F, Zhu GC, Liu WP (2013) Microbial community characterization, activity analysis and purifying efficiency in a biofilter process. J Environ Sci China 25(4):677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang JS, Yuan DX, Weng TP (2010) Pilot study of drinking water treatment with GAC, O3/BAC and membrane processes in Kinmen Island, Taiwan. Desalination 263(1–3):271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yapsakli K, Cecen F (2010) Effect of type of granular activated carbon on DOC biodegradation in biological activated carbon filters. Process Biochem 45(3):355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang SF, Wang YY, He WT, Wu M, Xing MY, Yang J, Gao NY, Yin DQ (2013a) Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH4 +-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted raw water. Bioresour Technol 131:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang YY, Hunt HK, Hu ZQ (2013b) Application of bacteriophages to selectively remove Pseudomonas aeruginosa in water and wastewater filtration systems. Water Res 47(13):4507–4518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang SF, Wang YY, He WT, Wu M, Xing MY, Yang J, Gao NY, Pan ML (2014) Impacts of temperature and nitrifying community on nitrification kinetics in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating polluted raw water. Chem Eng J 236:242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang HN, Zhang KF, Jin HX, Gu L, Yu X (2015) Variations in dissolved organic nitrogen concentration in biofilters with different media during drinking water treatment. Chemosphere 139:652–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao F, Yin J, Zhang XX, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Wu B, Li M (2015) Reduction in health risk induced by semi-volatile organic compounds and metals in a drinking water treatment plant. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(2):527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. G. Zhong
    • 1
  • J. F. Wan
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • G. J. Xu
    • 2
  • Y. Liu
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Advanced Environmental Biotechnology Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research InstituteNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.School of Chemical Engineering and EnergyZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations