Using oyster tissue toxicity as an indicator of disturbed environments
- 118 Downloads
Crassostrea virginica (the Eastern or American oyster) bioaccumulates pollutants from the water column, and therefore, its tissues can be used as bioindicators of past and present estuarine health. In this pilot project, we decided to investigate whether its tissues would be a suitable medium for toxicity testing using tissues from a variety of southern Texas locations of known and suspected anthropogenically impacted and unimpacted areas. We also conducted toxicity tests on sediments adjacent to oyster reefs using standard protocols for sediment toxicity. We tested the toxicity of tissues and sediments on the luminescent bacteria Vibrio fischeri, whose bioassays are commonly referred to by the trade name Microtox®. Microtox tests are quick, relatively inexpensive and sensitive to a range of contaminants. Evidence from this preliminary study suggests that conducting toxicity tests on oyster tissues may predict localized contamination better than when conducting toxicity tests on subtidal sediment. The refinement of these methods to use oyster tissues to detect contamination may be especially useful for environmental impact studies and/or studies where rapid and inexpensive information is needed.
KeywordsOyster Toxicity Pollution Crassostrea virginica Microtox
The initial idea for this trial study came after seeing the work by Beth Falls and others from Ocean Research and Conservation Association (ORCA) in Ft. Pierce, FL. Oysters have been used as sentinel species for time series and disturbance monitoring research by this group. Paige Uehling was funded by the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program (Grant No. DBI-1004903: SURF—Summer Undergraduate Research Focus) during the fieldwork and laboratory components of this study. Uehling was also a student at Bucknell University during this period. We thank Dr. Kim Withers for assisting Uehling with REU program logistics and support.
- Beijerinck MW (1889) Le Photobacterium luminosum, bactérie lumineuse de la Mer du Nord. Arch Neerl Sci Exact Nat 23:401–405Google Scholar
- Cotou E, Papathanassiou E, Tsangaris C (2002) Assessing the quality of marine coastal environments: comparison of scope for growth and Microtox bioassay results of pollution gradient areas in eastern Mediterranean (Greece). Environ Pollut 119:141–149. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00337-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Day KE, Dutka BJ, Kwan KK, Batista N, Reynoldson TB, Metcalfe-Smith JL (1995) Correlations between solid-phase microbial screening assays, whole-sediment toxicity tests with macroinvertebrates and in situ benthic community structure. J Great Lakes Res 21:192–206. doi: 10.1016/S0380-1330(95)71031-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farrington JW (1983) Bivalves as sentinels of coastal chemical pollution—the mussel (and oyster) watch. Oceanus 26:18–29Google Scholar
- Folk RL (1965) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill, AustinGoogle Scholar
- Montagna PA, Palmer TA (2012) Water and sediment quality status and trends in the coastal bend area—phase 2: data analysis. Report submitted to the Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries program for project 1206. Texas A&M University—Corpus Christi, Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, pp 520Google Scholar
- Nicolau BA, Hill EM (2011) Nueces Bay total maximum daily load project—year-five implementation effectiveness monitoring data report. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas, p 62Google Scholar
- Ross P, Burton GA, Greene M, Ho K, Meier P, Sweet L, Auwarter A, Bispo A, Doe K, Erstfeld K, Goudey S, Goyvaerts M, Henderson D, Jourdain M, Lenon M, Pandard P, Qureshi A, Rowland C, Schipper C, Schreurs W, Trottier S, Van Aggelen G (1999) Interlaboratory precision study of a whole sediment toxicity test with the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri. Environ Toxicol 14:339–345. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7278(199907)14:3<339:AID-TOX7>3.0.CO;2-R CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salazar MH, Salazar SM (1997) Using bioaccumulation and growth in caged intertidal oysters to assess oil exposure and effects in Delaware Bay. In: Proceedings of 20th Arctic Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) vol 1. pp 661–675Google Scholar
- Strategic Diagnostics Inc (2009) Microtox® basic solid-phase test (Basic SPT). Strategic Diagnostics Inc, NewarkGoogle Scholar