Advertisement

Optimization and evaluation of CBSOL LE red wool dye adsorption from aqueous solution onto commercial activated carbon

  • P. Kaur
  • A. P. Singh
  • A. K. Prince
  • J. P. Kushwaha
Original Paper

Abstract

Adsorptive removal of CBSOL LE red wool dye form aqueous solution onto commercial activated carbon (CAC) was investigated in a batch system. Various process parameters like pH, dosage of CAC (m) and adsorption time (t) were considered and optimized with full factorial central composite design under response surface methodology. At optimized parameters, kinetic and thermodynamic studies were performed and adsorption equilibrium data were represented using Freundlich, Langmuir and Redlich–Peterson (R–P) isotherm models. Also, diffusivity was calculated for the rate-limiting step in the adsorption process. Optimum process parameters were found to be m = 2.92 g/100 ml, t = 6.75 h and pH = 3.95, and at these optimized parameters, % removal of CBSOL LE red wool dye (Y) was found to be 86 %. Pseudo-second-order kinetic was found to best fit the adsorption kinetic data. Freundlich and R–P isotherms were found to best represent the equilibrium adsorption data. Diffusivity for the intra-particle diffusion was found to be 9.676 × 10−8 and 1.396 × 10−8 m2/s at initial concentration of CBSOL LE red wool dye (C 0) of 50 and 100 mg/l, respectively.

Keywords

CBSOL LE red wool dye Commercial activated carbon Adsorption kinetics Isotherms Diffusivity Response surface methodology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to the department of chemical engineering, Thapar University, Patiala, Punjab, India, for the financial support.

References

  1. Acar FN, Eren Z (2006) Removal of Cu(II) ions by activated poplar sawdust (Samsun Clone) from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater B137:909–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksu Z, Kabasakal E (2004) Batch adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid (2,4-D) from aqueous solution by granular activated carbon. Sep Purif Technol 35:223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-qodah Z, Shawabkah R (2009) Production and characterization of granular activated carbon from activated sludge. Braz J Chem Eng 26(1):127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansal S, Kushwaha JP, Sangal VK (2013) Electrochemical treatment of reactive black 5 textile wastewater: optimization, kinetics, and disposal study. Water Environ Res 85(12):2294–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkauskas J, Dervinyte M (2004) An investigation of the functional groups on the surface of activated carbons. J Serb Chem Soc 69(5):363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behbahani M, Alavi Moghaddam MR, Arami M (2011) Techno-economical evaluation of fluoride removal by electrocoagulation process: optimization through response surface methodology. Desalination 271:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard G, Maunaye M, Martin G (1984) Removal of heavy metals from water by means of natural zeolites. Water Res 18:1501–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrott Suhas PJM, Carrott Ribeiro MML (2007) Lignin—from natural adsorbent to activated carbon: a review. Bioresour Technol 98:2301–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborty S, Shamik C, Saha PD (2012) Batch removal of crystal violet from aqueous solution by H2SO4 modified sugarcane bagasse: equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic profile. Sep Sci Technol 47:1898–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiou M, Chuang G (2006) Competitive adsorption of dye metanil yellow and RB15 in acid solutions on chemically cross-linked chitosan beads. Chemosphere 62:731–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chowdhury S, Saha P (2010) Sea shell powder as a new adsorbent to remove Basic Green 4 (Malachite Green) from aqueous solutions: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. Chem Eng J 164:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crank J (1965) The mathematics of diffusion, 1st edn. Oxford Clarendon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Freundlich HMF (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 57:385–471Google Scholar
  14. Gaikwad RW, Kanawade SM, Misal SA (2010) Low cost sugarcane bagasse ash as an adsorbent for dye removal from dye effluent. Int J Chem Eng Appl 1(4):310–318Google Scholar
  15. Geethakarthi A, Phanikumar BR (2011) Adsorption of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions by tannery sludge developed activated carbon: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(3):561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Georgiou D, Melidis P, Aivasidis A (2002) Use of a microbial sensor: inhibition effect of azo reactive dyes on activated sludge. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 25:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory P (1986) Azo dyes: structure–carcinogenicity relationships. Dyes Pigm 7(1):45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guven G, Perendeci A, Tanyolac A (2008) Electrochemical treatment of deproteinated whey wastewater and optimization of treatment conditions with response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 157:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for adsorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Izares P, Fabiolamartianez Carlosjimeanez, Justolobato Rodrigo M (2006) Coagulation and electro coagulation of wastes polluted with dyes. Environ Sci Technol 40:6418–6424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kushwaha JP, Srivastava VC, Mall ID (2010) Treatment of dairy wastewater by commercial activated carbon and bagasse fly ash: parametric, kinetic and equilibrium modelling, disposal studies. Bioresour Technol 101(10):3474–3483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lakshmi UR, Srivastava VC, Mall ID, Lataye DH (2009) Rice husk ash as an effective adsorbent: evaluation of adsorptive characteristics for Indigo Carmine dye. J Environ Manag 90:710–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemlikchi W, Khaldi S, Mecherri MO, Lounici H, Drouiche N (2012) Degradation of Disperse Red 167 Azo Dye by bipolar electrocoagulation. Sep Sci Technol 47:1682–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malik PK (2003) Use of activated carbons prepared from sawdust and rice-husk for adsorption of acid dyes: a case study of Acid Yellow 36. Dyes Pigm 56:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malik R, Ramteke DS, Wate SR (2006) Physico-Chemical and surface characterization of adsorbent prepared from groundnut shell by ZnCl2 activation and its ability to absorb colour. Indian J Chem Technol 13:318–329Google Scholar
  27. Manoochehri M, Rattan VK, Khorsand A, Panahi H (2010) Capacity of activated carbon derived from agricultural waste in the removal of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions. Carbon Lett 11(3):169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Montgomery DC (1996) Design and analysis of experiments, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Onal Y, Akmil-Basar C, Eren D, Sarıc-Ozdemir C, Depci T (2006) Adsorption kinetics of malachite green onto activated carbon prepared from tunçbilek lignite. J Hazard Mater B128:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Özer A, Gürbüz G, Calimli A, Körbahti BK (2009) Biosorption of copper(II) ions on Enteromorpha prolifera: application of response surface methodology (RSM). Chem Eng J 146:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pandey NK, Velavendan P, KamachiMudali U, Natarajan R (2013) Adsorption of di-butyl phosphate on activated alumina: equilibrium and kinetics. Desalin Water Treat. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.839397 Google Scholar
  33. Parvathi C, Maruthavanan T (2010) Adsorptive removal of Megenta MB cold brand reactive dye by modified activated carbons derived from agricultural waste. Indian J Sci Technol 3(4):408–410Google Scholar
  34. Rafatullaha M, Sulaimana O, Hashima R, Ahmad A (2010) Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: a review. J Hazard Mater 177:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramaraju B, Kumar Reddy PM, Subrahmanyam C (2013) Low cost adsorbents from agricultural waste for removal of dyes. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 33:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rameshraja D, Srivastava VC, Kushwaha JP, Mall ID (2012) Quinoline adsorption onto granular activated carbon and bagasse fly ash. Chem Eng J 181–182:343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Redlich O, Peterson DL (1959) A useful adsorption isotherm. J Phys Chem 63:1024–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruthven DM (1984) Principles of adsorption and adsorption processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Seey TL, Noordin MJ, Kassim M (2012) Characterization of mangrove bark as a potentially low-cost adsorbent for reactive dye removal from aqueous solutions: equilibrium, mechanisms and kinetics. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol 9(1):9–19Google Scholar
  40. Sharma YC (2011) Adsorption characteristics of a low cost activated carbon for the reclamation of colored effluents containing malachite green. J Chem Eng Data 56:478–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singh S, Kushwaha JP (2014) Tannic acid adsorption/desorption study onto/from commercial activated carbon. Desalin Water Treat 52:3301–3311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soo EL, Salleh AB, Basri M, Rahman RNZA, Kamaruddin K (2004) Response surface methodological study on lipase-catalyzed synthesis of amino acid surfactants. Process Biochem 39:1511–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Srivastava VC, Swamy MM, Mall ID, Prasad B, Mishra IM (2006) Adsorptive removal of phenol by bagasse fly ash and activated carbon: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 272:89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suteu D, Malutan T, Bilba D (2011a) Agricultural waste corn cob as a sorbent for removing reactive dye orange 16: equilibrium and kinetic study. Cellulose Chem Technol 45(5–6):413–420Google Scholar
  45. Suteu D, Zaharia C, Malutan T (2011b) Removal of Orange 16 reactive dye from aqueous solutions by waste sunflower seed shells. J Serb Chem Soc 76(4):607–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weng CH, Lin YT, Tzeng TW (2009) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by adsorption onto pineapple leaf powder. J Hazard Mater 170:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yazdani M, Mahmoodi NM, Arami M, Bahrami H (2012) Isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic of cationic dye removal from binary system by Feldspar. Sep Sci Technol 47(2–12):1660–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Kaur
    • 1
  • A. P. Singh
    • 2
  • A. K. Prince
    • 2
  • J. P. Kushwaha
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Energy and EnvironmentThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations